Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T21:42:11.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Calcium and vitamin D homoeostasis in male fertility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2023

Sam Kafai Yahyavi
Affiliation:
Division of Translational Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark Group of Skeletal, Mineral, and Gonadal Endocrinology, Department of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Ida Marie Boisen
Affiliation:
Division of Translational Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark Group of Skeletal, Mineral, and Gonadal Endocrinology, Department of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Zhihui Cui
Affiliation:
Division of Translational Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark Group of Skeletal, Mineral, and Gonadal Endocrinology, Department of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Mads Joon Jorsal
Affiliation:
Division of Translational Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark Group of Skeletal, Mineral, and Gonadal Endocrinology, Department of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Ireen Kooij
Affiliation:
Division of Translational Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark Group of Skeletal, Mineral, and Gonadal Endocrinology, Department of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Rune Holt
Affiliation:
Division of Translational Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark Group of Skeletal, Mineral, and Gonadal Endocrinology, Department of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Anders Juul
Affiliation:
Department of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark International Centre for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health (EDMaRC), Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Martin Blomberg Jensen*
Affiliation:
Division of Translational Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark Group of Skeletal, Mineral, and Gonadal Endocrinology, Department of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
*
*Corresponding author: Martin Blomberg Jensen, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Calcium and vitamin D have well-established roles in maintaining calcium balance and bone health. Decades of research in human subjects and animals have revealed that calcium and vitamin D also have effects on many other organs including male reproductive organs. The presence of calcium-sensing receptor, vitamin D receptor, vitamin D activating and inactivating enzymes and calcium channels in the testes, male reproductive tract and human spermatozoa suggests that vitamin D and calcium may modify male reproductive function. Functional animal models have shown that vitamin D deficiency in male rodents leads to a decrease in successful mating and fewer pregnancies, often caused by impaired sperm motility and poor sperm morphology. Human studies have to a lesser extent validated these findings; however, newer studies suggest a positive effect of vitamin D supplementation on semen quality in cases with vitamin D deficiency, which highlights the need for initiatives to prevent vitamin D deficiency. Calcium channels in male reproductive organs and spermatozoa contribute to the regulation of sperm motility and capacitation, both essential for successful fertilisation, which supports a need to avoid calcium deficiency. Studies have demonstrated that vitamin D, as a regulator of calcium homoeostasis, influences calcium influx in the testis and spermatozoa. Emerging evidence suggests a potential link between vitamin D deficiency and male infertility, although further investigation is needed to establish a definitive causal relationship. Understanding the interplay between vitamin D, calcium and male reproductive health may open new avenues for improving fertility outcomes in men.

Type
Conference on ‘Understanding the role of sex and gender in nutrition research’
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Male reproduction is of increasing interest and concern worldwide due to the growing issues with reproductive health and low fertility rates(Reference Boivin, Bunting and Collins1). According to the UN, the average global fertility rate stood at 2⋅3 births per woman in 2021, falling from about 5 births per woman in the mid-twentieth century(2). Male infertility contributes to the problem in almost 50 % of infertile couples, with up to 30 % of all cases being attributed to a male factor as the sole cause(Reference Agarwal, Mulgund and Hamada3Reference Xavier, Salas-Huetos and Oud5). Numerous causes can influence male reproductive function. These include genetic mutations, environmental aspects, lifestyle choices, medical conditions or medications(Reference Dohle, Colpi and Hargreave6Reference Blomberg Jensen9). In recent years, the potential impact of nutritional factors on male reproductive health has gained significant attention. Both vitamin D deficiency and low-ionised calcium have been linked with impaired semen quality(Reference Blomberg Jensen, Gerner Lawaetz and Andersson10). While it can be challenging to directly attribute instances of male infertility to dietary or lifestyle changes, these factors can contribute to the problem. Modern dietary habits have seen a shift towards processed foods(Reference Mendonca11), which are often low in essential nutrients and can lead to nutrient deficiencies that may have a negative influence on fertility.

Vitamin D is a steroid hormone essential for various physiological processes in many different organs beyond its classical role in maintaining calcium homoeostasis and bone health(Reference Lieben, Carmeliet and Masuyama12). In the past 20 years, there has been a great interest in exploring the beneficial effects of vitamin D on human health and in various organs during health and disease(Reference Zhang, Fang and Tang13Reference Keum, Lee and Greenwood15). It has been suggested to be involved in several aspects of male reproductive function, such as sperm production, sperm motility and hormonal regulation(Reference Holt, Juel Mortensen and Harpelunde Poulsen16Reference Blomberg Jensen, Nielsen and Jørgensen18). Generally, vitamin D deficiency is defined as serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels below 25 or 30 nm/l and vitamin D insufficiency as levels below 50 nm/l. The active vitamin D metabolite, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) (calcitriol), exerts its effects through the vitamin D receptor (VDR), which is present in various reproductive tissues including testes, epididymis and prostate(Reference Blomberg Jensen9). The VDR, upon activation by 1,25(OH)2D3, potentially regulates the expression of genes involved in steroidogenesis, spermatogenesis and sperm maturation(Reference Jensen8).

Vitamin D regulates serum calcium concentrations by enhancing intestinal absorption, utilising bone storage, and increasing renal reabsorption(Reference Jensen8). These actions are involved in the tight regulation of calcium in the body which is essential for almost all physiological functions. Calcium is not only crucial for skeletal integrity but is also involved in intracellular signalling pathways, muscle contraction and hormonal regulation. In the male reproductive system, calcium is essential for sperm motility, sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction, which are crucial steps for successful fertilisation(Reference Blomberg Jensen, Gerner Lawaetz and Andersson10). Disturbances in calcium homoeostasis can affect sperm function and contribute to male infertility(Reference Blomberg Jensen, Gerner Lawaetz and Andersson10,Reference Boisen, Nielsen and Verlinden19) . Therefore, adequate levels of both vitamin D and calcium have been proposed to be important for optimal male reproductive health.

Understanding the significance of vitamin D and calcium in male reproductive health has the potential to guide clinical practice, form interventions and improve reproductive outcomes for men. As such, this review summarises the current understanding of the effects of vitamin D and calcium on male reproductive function.

Male reproductive tract

Male reproductive organs ensure the production, storage and delivery of motile and competent spermatozoa and the synthesis and secretion of male sex steroids. The testes are responsible for the production of spermatozoa through a complicated process known as spermatogenesis, which occurs in the seminiferous tubules(Reference Jensen8). Spermatogenesis involves both mitosis and meiosis to complete the development of mature spermatozoa from spermatogonial stem cells(Reference Heller and Clermont20). Spermatogenesis relies on the interplay between various cell types, including germ cells, Sertoli cells, peritubular cells and Leydig cells. Within the seminiferous tubules, the specialised Sertoli cells, in conjunction with peritubular cells, create the microenvironment that allows germ cells to develop from diploid spermatogonia to haploid spermatids(Reference Sharpe, McKinnell and Kivlin21). They provide physical support and nutrition, and regulate the milieu required for proper sperm development. Various genetic and endocrine factors tightly regulate the functions of Sertoli and peritubular cells, with follicle-stimulating hormone and testosterone being prominent regulators necessary for optimal spermatogenesis(Reference O'Shaughnessy, Monteiro and Verhoeven22). Leydig cells, located in the interstitial spaces between the seminiferous tubules, produce testosterone in response to luteinising hormone stimulation. This ensures a high intratesticular testosterone concentration that can be up to 100 times higher than in serum(Reference Jarow, Wright and Brown23,Reference Skakkebaek, Rajpert-De Meyts and Buck Louis24) . Testosterone has a significant impact on fetal testis development, the descent of the testes into the scrotum and the maturation of Sertoli cells during puberty. The maturation of Sertoli cells marks the initiation of spermatogenesis and coincides with the cessation of their proliferation during puberty. Mature Sertoli cells cannot proliferate, thus the quantity of Sertoli cells established during early life determines the capacity for sperm production in adulthood(Reference Sharpe, McKinnell and Kivlin21). Consequently, the number of sperm present in a semen sample is, to a certain extent, determined during fetal and early life.

After successful spermatogenesis, the spermatozoa are immotile and undergo passive transportation to the epididymis through the efferent ducts. In the epididymis, the spermatozoa undergo final maturation and become motile. The epididymal fluid composition is tightly regulated and differs markedly as the spermatozoa transit through the caput, corpus and cauda of the epididymis. During ejaculation, spermatozoa meet secretions from the prostate and seminal vesicles that may also influence sperm function.

Vitamin D

Physiology and metabolism

The inactive form of vitamin D, cholecalciferol, is synthesised in the skin following the conversion of 7-dehydrocholesterol by UV B radiation from the sun(Reference Cheng, Levine and Bell25,Reference Prosser and Jones26) . Cholecalciferol can also be absorbed from the diet or via supplementation. In detail, cholecalciferol must undergo two hydroxylations to form the active form of vitamin D, 1,25(OH)2D3 that can bind and activate the VDR(Reference Ohyama27Reference Gray, Omdahl and Ghazarian29). These steps involve the microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. The first step is 25-hydroxylation by hepatic CYP2R1 which forms the prohormone 25OHD (calcidiol) followed by 1α-hydroxylation by renal CYP27B1 to form 1,25(OH)2D3, whereas CYP24A1 inactivates 25OHD and 1,25(OH)2D3(Reference Bouillon, Carmeliet and Verlinden30). Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is the main inducer of renal CYP27B1 expression and thus the main inducer of circulating 1,25(OH)2D3 and a powerful mobiliser of calcium from the skeleton(Reference Yuan, Sitara and Sato31). 1,25(OH)2D3 binds and activates the VDR which forms a heterodimer with the retinoid X receptor. This complex recognises vitamin D response elements in the promoter region of target genes and regulates transcription(Reference Bouillon, Carmeliet and Verlinden30). The DNA-binding domain of the VDR mediates the transcriptional effects, but VDR also has an alternative ligand-binding pocket that mediates rapid non-genomic effects by regulating second messenger systems. In clinical practice, vitamin D status is determined by measuring serum levels of 25OHD and not 1,25(OH)2D3, as 25OHD correlates with bone mass density, serum calcium level and PTH secretion(Reference Lips32,Reference Holick33) . However, cellular responsiveness to circulating vitamin D metabolites goes beyond VDR expression as the presence of activating and inactivating enzymes locally in the target organs influences the availability of substrates for VDR and thereby influences the effect of vitamin D on the target tissue(Reference Nagakura, Abe and Suda34,Reference Choudhary, Jansson and Stoilov35) .

Expression of vitamin D regulating enzymes and vitamin D receptor in the male reproductive system

Studies have consistently found mRNA and protein expression of the VDR and the vitamin D activating and inactivating enzymes in various cell types of the gonads and male reproductive tract(Reference Blomberg Jensen9). In most studies, VDR is co-expressed with the activating enzyme, CYP27B1, and the deactivating enzyme, CYP24A1. This co-expression occurs throughout the reproductive tract, including in some Sertoli cells, most germ cells, spermatozoa, Leydig cells and the epithelial cells lining the tract(Reference Johnson, Grande and Roche36Reference Merke, Kreusser and Bier42). The local presence and activity of the enzymes play a crucial role in regulating the concentration of 1,25(OH)2D3 within cells and consequently activating the VDR.

In adult testes, the VDR and metabolising enzymes are primarily expressed in human germ cells, with a marked expression in spermatogonia, spermatocytes and spermatids in both human subjects and rodents(Reference Blomberg Jensen, Nielsen and Jørgensen18,Reference Zanatta, Zamoner and Zanatta43) . Studies have also found VDR expression in both the nucleus and cytoplasm of primary cultures of immature Sertoli cells, in fetal Sertoli cells and in the immature mouse Sertoli cell line TM4 where 1,25(OH)2D3 is known to mediate fast non-genomic effects(Reference Zanatta, Bouraïma-Lelong and Delalande44Reference Menegaz, Barrientos-Duran and Kline50). The expression levels of CYP2R1, CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 in the testes indicate that the cells are equipped to respond to and regulate the effects of vitamin D metabolites(Reference Jensen8,Reference Blomberg Jensen, Nielsen and Jørgensen18) . Furthermore, the effects of cholecalciferol or calcitriol treatment on gonadal function may vary depending on the specific expression pattern of these enzymes. Cholecalciferol can be activated locally, potentially eliciting a response, whereas calcitriol is already active and immediately triggers responses or undergoes inactivation. This suggests that the local regulation of vitamin D is important for spermatogenesis and sperm function. The expression of VDR in germ cells suggests that calcitriol may play a role in sperm function(Reference Foresta, Strapazzon and De Toni51). Multiple studies have reported the presence of VDR in specific regions of mature human spermatozoa, including the post-acrosomal part of the head, the neck region and the midpiece(Reference Blomberg Jensen, Nielsen and Jørgensen18,Reference Aquila, Guido and Middea52) . Additionally, the vitamin D activating enzymes are also expressed in spermatozoa, and the inactivating enzyme CYP24A1 exhibits a distinct expression pattern at the annulus. Notably, the expression levels of VDR and CYP24A1 are higher in spermatozoa from healthy men compared with infertile men(Reference Blomberg Jensen, Jørgensen and Nielsen53), which supports that vitamin D may be beneficial for sperm function.

VDR expression has also been demonstrated in Leydig cells, suggesting a potential direct impact of vitamin D on steroidogenesis and thereby also an indirect effect on spermatogenesis and male fertility. Recent studies have detected VDR at the protein level in fetal and adult Leydig cells in human subjects, roosters and mice(Reference Blomberg Jensen, Nielsen and Jørgensen18,Reference Oliveira, Dornas and Kalapothakis38,Reference Blomberg Jensen, Jørgensen and Nielsen54,Reference Hirai, Tsujimura and Ueda55) . Moreover, VDR, CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 are all expressed in the epididymis, prostate and seminal vesicles(Reference Blomberg Jensen, Nielsen and Jørgensen18,Reference Mahmoudi, Zarnani and Jeddi-Tehrani37,Reference Oliveira, Dornas and Kalapothakis38) , which highlights a potential direct effect throughout the male reproductive system.

Animal models: vitamin D deficiency and male fertility

Numerous animal models have been utilised to investigate the relationship between vitamin D and male fertility (defined as successful conception). An overview of the models is shown in Table 1. The first association was found in a study exploring vitamin D deficiency in rats(Reference Kwiecinski, Petrie and DeLuca56). Vitamin D deficiency in male rats led to a 45 % decrease in successful mating, defined as the presence of sperm in the vaginal tract, compared with rats with sufficient vitamin D levels. Additionally, rats with vitamin D deficiency had 71 % fewer pregnancies compared with vitamin D-sufficient rats(Reference Kwiecinski, Petrie and DeLuca56). When the rats were supplemented with calcium, the fertility potential was restored, implying an indirect effect of hypovitaminosis D leading to hypocalcaemia and secondarily reduced fertility(Reference Uhland, Kwiecinski and DeLuca57). However, after reassessment of the data by adjusting for the mating period and male:female ratio, and by determining the time to pregnancy, it was evident that the rats still had lower pregnancy rates after insemination with sperm from normocalcemic vitamin D-deficient rats than normocalcemic vitamin D-replete rats(Reference Uhland, Kwiecinski and DeLuca57). This indicates that vitamin D itself is important for semen quality and that the impaired fertility caused by vitamin D deficiency cannot be fully reversed by correcting hypocalcaemia alone(Reference Blomberg Jensen9). Newer animal studies on vitamin D deficiency have supported the negative effects of inadequate vitamin D levels on semen quality and male fertility. In general, the low fertility rates in vitamin D-deficient male rodents seem to be caused by impaired sperm count, motility and occasionally poor sperm morphology(Reference Audet, Laforest and Martineau58,Reference Kinuta, Tanaka and Moriwake59) .

Table 1. Six studies investigating the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and fertility in rodents

N.D., not determined.

Animal models made vitamin D-deficient either by diet, knockout of the vitamin D receptor or the 1α-hydroxylase (Cyp27b1).

*Phenotype reported for prolonged vitamin D-deficient mice; ↓, negatively associated; →, no association.

Dietary vitamin D-deficient mice have also been shown to have lower testicular weight and fewer spermatozoa in the cauda epididymis compared with controls(Reference Fu, Chen and Xu60). Another study revealed adverse impacts on semen quality in vitamin D-deficient rats when compared with control groups. These effects included reductions in germ cell numbers, sperm count, sperm morphology, motility and viability. Furthermore, a decrease in serum testosterone levels was also observed in vitamin D-deficient rats(Reference Zamani, Saki and Hatami61). Duration and severity of the deficiency may be an important factor in reproductive function. Vitamin D deficiency through one spermatogenic cycle induced a significant increase in sperm DNA fragmentation but no significant effect on other semen parameters(Reference Shahreza, Hajian and Gharagozloo62). In contrast, prolonged vitamin D deficiency through two spermatogenic cycles resulted in a modest but significant decrease in sperm motility. Furthermore, different degrees of vitamin D deficiency have been induced in mice, and no effect was observed on sperm concentration and sperm viability, but sperm morphology was decreased in the severe deficiency group(Reference Sun, Chen and Zhang63). In another study, DNA fragmentation has also been shown to increase significantly in spermatozoa of vitamin D-deficient rats, which could explain the impaired fertility(Reference Merino, Sánchez and Gregorio64). Combined, these studies indicate that vitamin D is involved in the regulation of male fertility in rodents, suggesting a potential link between vitamin D status and reproductive health.

Human studies

Many of the cross-sectional studies investigating the link between vitamin D status and testicular function have been reviewed and discussed before, and the link critically depends on the fraction of men with low vitamin D status in the study population(Reference Lorenzen, Boisen and Mortensen65). Recent years have seen a surge in human intervention trials with vitamin D and male fertility outcomes. In this review, we have evaluated six randomised clinical intervention studies, with four of them being conducted after 2020. An overview of the trials is shown in Table 2. In the first randomised controlled trial from 2014, 86 infertile men with idiopathic oligoasthenozoospermia were included and randomised to receive either a 3 month supplementation of cholecalciferol (5 μg daily) and calcium (600 mg daily), or placebo(Reference Deng, Li and Yang66). This study found a significant increase in the number of progressive motile sperm and a higher pregnancy rate in the vitamin D v. placebo-treated men. These findings are supported by the most recent randomised clinical trial of 120 men conducted in 2022 on Indian men(Reference Padmapriya, Archana and Sharma67). They found an increased sperm volume, progressive motility, total motility and sperm count in men treated with cholecalciferol (100 μg daily for 10 weeks) when compared with the placebo group. The study does not report the serum 25OHD levels before or after treatment, so it is not possible to determine whether the effect was found in vitamin D insufficient, deficient or sufficient men.

Table 2. Interventional studies of vitamin D and semen quality in infertile men

25OHD, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; N, cohort size; N.D., not determined.

Six human randomised controlled studies investigating the relationship between serum vitamin D levels and semen quality in human subjects were evaluated.

↓, decreased with supplementation; ↑, increased with supplementation ; →, no changes.

In 2018, the biggest study to date was conducted and contradicted these findings(Reference Blomberg Jensen, Lawaetz and Petersen17). In the Copenhagen bone-gonadal study, 330 Danish infertile men with vitamin D insufficiency (defined as serum 25OHD <50 nm/l) were randomised to receive either a high single-dose cholecalciferol supplementation (7 500 μg) followed by daily supplementation of cholecalciferol (35 μg) and calcium (500 mg daily), or placebo. The study showed that supplementation did not affect semen parameters or live birth rates when comparing the groups. The spontaneous pregnancy rate tended to be higher in couples in which the men were treated with vitamin D and calcium compared with couples in which the men were in the placebo group, but the results were not statistically significant. However, subgroup analysis of oligospermic men did demonstrate an increased live birth rate in the treatment group (36 v. 18 %). One criticism of the study is the use of a high-loading dosage that could lead to high CYP24A1 activity locally in many organs and thus inactivate vitamin D activity in the gonads. The overall negative findings of the study are consistent with three other recent randomised clinical trials conducted on Iranian men(Reference Gheflati, Mirjalili and Kaviani68Reference Amini, Mohammadbeigi and Vafa70). One trial with results published in 2020, investigated the effects of vitamin D supplementation in sixty-two infertile men with impaired semen quality and vitamin D insufficiency (defined as serum 25OHD <50 nm/l). The men were randomised to receive either cholecalciferol (1 250 μg once weekly) for 8 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose (1 250 μg once) lasting the final 4 weeks, or placebo treatment. The same study design was used by another Iranian research group from 2021, conducted on forty-four men with asthenozoospermia(Reference Gheflati, Mirjalili and Kaviani68). Both studies used vitamin D-deficient men (defined as serum levels <75 nm/l) and found no effect of cholecalciferol supplementation on semen parameters. A third Iranian study published in 2021 evaluated the effects of cholecalciferol on both endocrine markers and semen parameters in eighty-six infertile men with asthenozoospermia(Reference Maghsoumi-Norouzabad, Zare Javid and Mansoori69). Supplementation with 100 μg cholecalciferol daily for 12 weeks had no significant effects on semen volume, sperm count or sperm morphology compared with the placebo group. However, they found a positive effect on total and progressive sperm motility, to some extent supporting the results found in the Chinese and Indian study populations.

Overall, most of the interventional human data available indicate that vitamin D supplementation does not affect sperm count, volume, morphology or pregnancies. However, it must be noted that there are some contradictory reports on the presumed effect on total and progressive sperm motility, but positive data have only been generated in a few relatively small studies. Furthermore, with the diverse study populations of the mentioned studies (co-morbidities, age and BMI), design, inclusion criteria and baseline vitamin D status, it is hard to find consensus on the effect. Observational human studies and case–control studies investigating the association between vitamin D status and reproductive functions have also been conducted. These results are conflicting; however, most studies find that low vitamin D status is linked to impaired semen quality and fertility(Reference Heller and Clermont20,Reference Prosser and Jones71Reference Kidroni, Har-Nir and Menczel76) . Therefore, it seems likely that the possible effect of vitamin D supplementation on semen quality and male fertility is present under conditions with vitamin D deficiency or prolonged vitamin D insufficiency. These data are in line with animal studies showing impaired fertility and poor semen quality in males with vitamin D deficiency, which by combining suggest that vitamin D deficiency should be avoided to secure optimal reproductive function.

Calcium

Systemic calcium homoeostasis

Serum calcium is maintained within a narrow physiological range to secure normal function of several organs as multiple cellular processes are influenced by calcium. Virtually all cells in the body have a 20 000-fold gradient of calcium ions (Ca2+) from the extracellular to the intracellular environment (about 100 nm/l-Ca2+ intracellularly), making them capable of using Ca2+ as a second messenger when entry is permitted into the cell by Ca2+ channels(Reference Clapham77). The total calcium concentration in serum is 2⋅20–2⋅55 mm/l and the non-protein-bound ionised calcium level is 1⋅18–1⋅32 mm/l although the exact reference levels vary among laboratories. A large fraction of calcium is protein-bound or in complex with anions such as citrate, lactate, phosphate or bicarbonate and the free and active fraction is therefore dependent on pH and availability of binding partners(Reference Baird78). To maintain serum calcium within this narrow range several potent regulators influence systemic calcium homoeostasis by modifying intestinal absorption, renal reabsorption and excretion and release from the skeletal reservoir. The calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) in the parathyroid cells senses the Ca2+ concentration in serum and transduces an intracellular signal that inhibits the production and release of PTH into the bloodstream(Reference Brown, Gamba and Riccardi79). PTH binds primarily to the PTH receptor 1 and mobilises calcium to the circulation. In bone, PTH mediates calcium release by promoting bone resorption, and in the kidney, it increases calcium reabsorption and up-regulates CYP27B1 activity which ensures high vitamin D activity. In mice, the CaSR is indispensable as Casr knockout mice die shortly after birth and suffer from hypercalcaemia and hyperparathyroidism(Reference Ho, Conner and Pollak80). In human subjects, homozygous loss-of-function mutations in CASR cause neonatal severe hyperparathyroidism, a potentially life-threatening condition with severe hypercalcaemia, bone demineralisation and respiratory distress, whereas a heterozygous loss-of-function mutation in CASR causes familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia 1(Reference Boisen, Mos and Lerche-Black81), which shows that full compensation by other factors does not occur.

In the epithelia lining the intestine and kidney, calcium is transported from the lumen to the blood through the cell cytoplasm by the transcellular pathway or between intercellular spaces by the paracellular pathway. Expression of transcellular calcium transporters in the kidney and intestine is regulated mainly by 1,25(OH)2D3(Reference Hoenderop, Nilius and Bindels82). Transcellular calcium transport involves three steps: first, Ca2+ is transported into the cytosol by transient receptor potential vanilloid −5 or −6 (TRPV −5/−6) Ca2+ channels. Secondly, Ca2+ binds intracellularly to calbindin-D9k (or -D28k) to maintain a low intracellular Ca2+ concentration. Thirdly, Ca2+ is removed from the cytosol by the plasma-membrane calcium ATPase (PMCA) proteins or the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger 1(Reference VanHouten and Wysolmerski83). CaSR is expressed in the thick ascending limb of Henle in the kidney, and acute inhibition of CaSR increases the permeability of the paracellular Ca2+ pathway(Reference Loupy, Ramakrishnan and Wootla84). More recently, it has been shown that CaSR inhibits the paracellular Ca2+ transport by increasing the expression of renal claudin-14 responsible for the inhibition of reabsorption in a PTH-independent manner(Reference Dimke, Desai and Borovac85). In addition, PTH directly increases renal Ca2+ reabsorption by inhibiting claudin-14(Reference Sato, Courbebaisse and Ide86).

Calcium balance in the male reproductive tract

Calcium and phosphate concentrations are very different in the proximal and the distal parts of the epididymis. The concentration of calcium decreases, whereas the concentration of phosphate increases(Reference Clulow, Jones and Hansen87). These variations in calcium and phosphate levels are believed to play a crucial role in sperm maturation and the initiation of sperm motility and in keeping the sperm quiescent during storage in the distal epididymis. The high calcium concentration in the seminal fluid may be of great importance as spermatozoa are transcriptionally silent and heavily rely on intracellular calcium as a signalling system(Reference Blomberg Jensen, Bjerrum and Jessen88). A list of observational studies exploring total and ionised calcium levels in the human seminal fluid/plasma is summarised in Table 3. Based on the weighted average of the studies included in Table 3, the concentration of total calcium in the seminal fluid is about 7⋅48 mm/l, and the concentration of ionised calcium is about 0⋅23 mm/l. Citrate and phosphate concentrations are also high in the seminal fluid, ensuring competent buffer systems and making the ionised calcium concentration lower than the corresponding serum level(Reference Owen and Katz89Reference N'Guessan, Yaye and Coulibaly93). Studies exploring the potential impact of the total calcium concentration in seminal fluid on sperm parameters are inconclusive – some suggest it is associated with increased motility(Reference Sørensen, Bergdahl and Hjøllund94,Reference Prien, Lox and Messer95) , another study found an inverse relationship with sperm morphology(Reference Salsabili, Mehrsai and Jalaie96) and other studies found no impact on sperm function(Reference Kılıç, Sarıca and Yaman97Reference Abou-Shakra, Ward and Everard99). One study showed that low total calcium content in the seminal fluid (<5 mm/l) was associated with fewer progressive and total motile sperm and fewer morphologically normal sperm compared with men with calcium levels between 5 and 10 mm/l(Reference Boisen, Nielsen and Verlinden19). Regarding studies that investigated the link between ionised calcium and semen quality variables, two studies found a positive association with motility(Reference Prien, Lox and Messer95,Reference Kılıç, Sarıca and Yaman97) , one showed a negative association(Reference Arver and Sjöberg100) and one study found no effect(Reference Magnus, Åbyholm and Kofstad91). The possible link between total calcium/Ca2+ levels and sperm motility/morphology/concentration is interesting because these semen variables are predictors of male fertility potential. However, the spermatozoa are only briefly exposed to the seminal fluid before it is mixed with female fluids, which questions a direct effect of calcium content on the fertility potential. The total calcium concentration in seminal fluid is more than 2-fold higher than the level found in serum, and the levels are not associated (Fig. 1A)(Reference Boisen, Nielsen and Verlinden19,Reference Arver and Sjöberg100) , hence there must be an active transport of calcium from serum into the seminal fluid. The calcium concentration in the different epididymal compartments (studies have only been conducted in rodents) varies largely from low to several-fold higher than the corresponding serum concentration (Fig. 1B)(Reference Jenkins, Lechene and Howards101Reference Boisen, Hansen and Mortensen103). To maintain this steep gradient the mechanism and proteins underlying calcium homoeostasis must be tightly regulated. Seminal fluid comprises fluid from the epididymis (about 10 %), prostate (about 20 %) and seminal vesicles (about 70 %), which indicates that the calcium content in the ejaculate is highly dependent on secretions occurring after the transit and storage of the spermatozoa in the epididymis. At the time of ejaculation, spermatozoa escape the millimolar concentrations of citrate and phosphate in seminal fluid and encounter about 2⋅2 mm/l-total calcium and about 1⋅23 mm/l-Ca2+ in the follicular fluid in the female reproductive tract(Reference Magnus, Åbyholm and Kofstad91,Reference Boisen, Rehfeld and Mos104) . This influences sperm function and facilitates sperm capacitation and hyperactivation that help the sperm swim up in the vicinity of the oocyte.

Table 3. Studies investigating ionised and total calcium levels in human seminal fluid/plasma

CASA, computer-assisted semen analysis; CaSR, calcium-sensing receptor; n, cohort size; N.A., not applicable (the studies did not contain a conclusion on calcium levels and sperm function).

The ionised calcium and/or total calcium concentration measured in the seminal fluid or seminal plasma. The conclusions drawn by the authors of the papers regarding the calcium content and semen parameters are mentioned in the third column. All studies are mean(sd) except for Sørensen et al.(Reference Sørensen, Bergdahl and Hjøllund94), which is given as the median. The weighted averages are calculated based on the study sizes.

Fig. 1. Calcium and vitamin D in the male reproductive tract. (A) Seminal fluid concentration relative to serum concentration of calcium, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) and 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (24,25(OH)2D3) in men. Dotted lines represent the detection limit in seminal fluid, solid lines represent the constant concentration in seminal fluid and grey solid lines represent the undetectable levels in seminal fluid. The figure is based on data presented in(Reference Boisen, Nielsen and Verlinden19,Reference Hansen, Rehfeld and De Neergaard138) . (B) The concentration of calcium and vitamin D in the intraluminal fluid of rodent epididymis relative to the serum concentration. In caput, the 25OHD concentration is 15× lower and 11× lower in cauda compared with serum levels. The calcium concentration is 2× higher in caput and 4× lower in cauda. The figure is based on data presented in(Reference Kidroni, Har-Nir and Menczel76,Reference Jenkins, Lechene and Howards101,Reference Jenkins, Lechene and Howards102) .

Gene expression is silenced during spermatogenesis as histones are replaced by protamines that further condense DNA and prevent transcription within the small spermatozoa (about 4⋅4 × 2⋅8 μm)(Reference Miller and Ostermeier105,Reference Bellastella, Cooper and Battaglia106) . Protein synthesis and processing are also hampered and therefore, spermatozoa critically depend on second messenger systems to transmit extracellular signals, and they mainly rely on changes in the intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i). An increase in [Ca2+]i occurs by opening Ca2+ channels across the cell membrane or from intracellular stores – constituting a Ca2+ signal. [Ca2+]i regulates capacitation, hyperactivation and the acrosome reaction(Reference Publicover, Harper C and Barratt107). Regulation of the [Ca2+]i ensures the activation of spermatozoa at the appropriate time. The importance is indicated by studies showing that loss-of-function mutations in the gene coding for the main Ca2+ channel in sperm, CatSper, lead to infertility, and spermatozoa from men in fertility treatment have lower Ca2+ influx in response to progesterone compared with spermatozoa from healthy men(Reference Kelly, Brown and Costello108,Reference Williams, Mansell and Alasmari109) . Studies have shown that men with severely impaired semen quality and men who had unsuccessful fertility treatment have significantly lower Ca2+ influx upon stimulation with female secreted factors compared with spermatozoa from healthy men indicating that these Ca2+ signals are clinically relevant(Reference Kelly, Brown and Costello108,Reference Alasmari, Barratt and Publicover110) .

Animal models with ablation of genes related to calcium homoeostasis in the testes or epididymis

Calcium homoeostasis in the male reproductive tract and its impact on male fertility has been studied in various animal models. Table 4 presents rodent models where a gene ablation has led to changes in local calcium homoeostasis in the testes or epididymis. The Cyp27b1 −/− mice exhibit hypocalcaemia, decreased sperm count and motility resulting in impaired fertility. Cyp27b1 −/− mice also have lower expression of calcium transport proteins including CaSR, CaV3⋅1 and TRPV5 in testes compared with wild-type mice(Reference Sun, Chen and Zhang63). Interestingly, a rescue diet (containing high calcium, phosphate and lactose) reestablished both the fertility and the expression of CaSR, CaV3⋅1 and TRPV5 in the testes of Cyp27b1−/− mice(Reference Sun, Chen and Zhang63). A study in Vdr −/− mice also found reduced Casr expression in the testes compared with wild-type mice(Reference Boisen, Nielsen and Verlinden19), which is in accordance with the role of VDR as a regulator of calcium transporters in various organs. Previous studies have shown CaSR expression in the testes and spermatozoa from different species(Reference Sun, Chen and Zhang63,Reference Mendoza, Perez-Marin and Garcia-Marin111Reference Ellinger117) , and a proteomic study in bulls showed that the CaSR was the most differentially expressed protein when comparing good v. bad quality spermatozoa(Reference Singh, Sengar and Singh118). Moreover, treatment with different CaSR agonists increased sperm motility in rodents(Reference Mendoza, Perez-Marin and Garcia-Marin111). However, a germ cell-specific Casr knockdown model in male mice had no major reproductive phenotype compared with tamoxifen-treated controls irrespectively of the timing of Casr knockdown as conducted both pre- and post-pubertally (70 and 84 % reduction, respectively)(Reference Boisen, Nielsen and Verlinden19), which questions the importance of CaSR in spermatozoa, at least in mice. In a recent paper investigating CaSR function in human sperm, three patients with loss-of-function mutations in CASR, and one patient with a gain-of-function mutation were included. Spermatozoa from all patients had aberrant Ca2+ signalling. Moreover, two of the patients with loss-of-function mutations in CASR had either low sperm motility and few morphologically normal spermatozoa, or calcifications in the efferent ducts(Reference Boisen, Rehfeld and Mos104).

Table 4. Mouse knockout models that impact local calcium homoeostasis in the male reproductive tract

CaSR, calcium-sensing receptor; Ip3r1, intracellular ion channel inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor 1; Itpr1/2, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 1/2; KO, knockout; Mtmr14, myotubularin related protein 14; N.A., not applicable; N.D., not determined; Pmca1/4, plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPase 1/4; Ryr, ryanodine receptor; SERCA2, sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase; Sppl2c, signal peptide peptidase-like 2C; Trpm5/8, transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M 5/8; Trpv5/6, transient receptor potential vanilloid sub-type 5/6; Vdr, vitamin D receptor.

↓, negatively associated; →, no association; *the low caudal sperm count after swim-out may be explained by impaired motility rather than impaired sperm production or storage.

Myotubularin-related protein 14 (MTMR14) is a phosphoinositide phosphatase and knockout of the gene results in impaired male fertility. In the Mtmr14 −/− mice, the mRNA expression of the calcium channels inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 1 and 2 (Itpr −1/−2), and ryanodine receptor 3 (Ryr3) was decreased and [Ca2+]i in spermatozoa derived from epididymis was lower compared with spermatozoa from wild-type mice(Reference Wen, Yu and Liu119). Additionally, Tmem203-deficient male mice are sterile and exhibit a profound defect in spermatogenesis. mRNA expression profiling revealed down-regulation of the calcium channels Trpv6 and transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M members 5 and 8 (Trpm −5/−8), and an increase in Pmca1 and intracellular ion channel inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor (Ip3r1) in testes. Testicular cells from Tmem203 mice also exhibited altered calcium mobilisation(Reference Shambharkar, Bittinger and Latario120). Signal peptide peptidase-like 2C (Sppl2c) deficiency in male mice leads to dysregulation of the calcium pump sarcoendoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (SERCA2) involved in intracellular Ca2+ handling in male germ cells. The disturbed calcium homoeostasis resulted in impaired motility of spermatozoa but preserved fertility(Reference Niemeyer, Mentrup and Heidasch121). Efflux of intracellular Ca2+ can be mediated by the PMCA pump, which is essential for spermatozoa as Pmca4 −/− mice are infertile due to Ca2+ overload and inability of spermatozoa to undergo capacitation(Reference Okunade, Miller and Pyne122,Reference Prasad, Okunade and Miller123) .

The epididymis requires active calcium transport to maintain the calcium concentration gradient (Fig. 1B), which is necessary to ensure normal sperm function. In cauda epididymis in global Trpv6 knockout mice a 10-fold higher calcium concentration impaired sperm motility(Reference Weissgerber, Kriebs and Tsvilovskyy124). Ma et al.(Reference Ma, Zhang and Liu125) found an excessive calcium accumulation in the epididymis of vitamin K2-deficiency rats due to dysregulation of γ-glutamyl carboxylase (GGCX) and matrix gla protein (MGP). The vitamin K2-deficiency rats had lower sperm count and sperm motility. In agreement with the results in rats, the study also identified an SNP mutation in GGCX in an infertile man with asthenozoospermia, indicating that the influence of GGCX and MGP on fertility is conserved between species.

Human relevance of calcium in male fertility

The link between calcium, vitamin D, bone and gonadal function(Reference Oury, Ferron and Huizhen126Reference Bøllehuus Hansen, Kaludjerovic and Nielsen129) complicates interpretations of human and animal studies as many of the effects of calcium may be indirect. In most human studies on vitamin D and male fertility, potential calcium-mediated effects have been neglected. In a study of infertile men, serum Ca2+ levels were negatively associated with sperm motility indicating that Ca2+ may influence semen quality in infertile men(Reference Blomberg Jensen, Gerner Lawaetz and Andersson10). This association suggests that systemic regulators of calcium homoeostasis may also influence local calcium transport in the male reproductive tract, as calcium levels in serum and calcium levels in the epididymis and seminal fluid are not associated (Fig. 1A).

Significant interspecies differences exist in fertility and sperm function. Hence, extrapolating results from mice to human subjects in the fertility field is problematic and should be performed with caution(Reference Kaupp and Strünker130). Depending on the species, fertilisation occurs under entirely different aqueous conditions with different calcium and vitamin D levels, which remains to be thoroughly studied in vivo. Most data have been generated by in vitro studies and the true levels of calcium surrounding the spermatozoa as it moves through the female reproductive tract to the oocyte and in the moment of fertilisation are largely unknown.

Conclusions and perspectives

In conclusion, vitamin D and calcium are implicated in various facets of male fertility. Preliminary findings from intervention studies suggest that vitamin D supplementation may be beneficial for men with low vitamin D status, especially those with a serum 25OHD level below 25 nm/l. However, further investigation through larger clinical studies is required to enhance our understanding and address whether vitamin D supplementation can improve semen quality mostly in men with insufficient vitamin D levels. It seems that many of the observed effects of vitamin D are mediated indirectly through changes in local levels of factors such as calcium or phosphate, not only in the testes but also in epididymis, prostate and seminal vesicles. The crucial role of calcium in male reproductive function extends beyond sperm motility and fertilisation, as calcium signalling is involved in various processes, such as spermatogenesis, sperm maturation, capacitation, acrosome reaction and imbalances in calcium levels may disrupt these events and impair fertility. The exact mechanisms underlying the impact of calcium on male reproduction are not fully understood, although studies have suggested that maintaining optimal calcium homoeostasis is essential for overall reproductive health.

More research on the specific role of vitamin D and other regulators of local calcium and phosphate signalling in the male reproductive organs is warranted. Recently, we identified the receptor activator of NFκB ligand as a novel regulator of the production and maturation of spermatozoa(Reference Blomberg Jensen, Andreassen and Jørgensen128). Inhibition of receptor activator of NFκB ligand increased sperm motility and sperm count in a subgroup of men with preserved Sertoli cell capacity, and identification of predictive biomarkers for positive treatment outcomes is crucial and requires further investigation. Moreover, it is crucial to shift focus towards investigating more definitive outcomes such as conception rates and live births. Currently, there is a concerning lack of evidence-based treatments available for men with idiopathic infertility, despite the high prevalence of male infertility(Reference Krausz7,Reference Huynh131) . Rather than tailoring treatments to the specific causes of infertility(Reference Blomberg Jensen, Lawaetz and Petersen17,Reference Skakkebaek, Rajpert-De Meyts and Buck Louis24,Reference Bøllehuus Hansen, Kaludjerovic and Nielsen129,Reference Juel Mortensen, Lorenzen and Jorgensen132) , most infertile couples are commonly subjected to inseminations or assisted reproductive techniques. Assisted reproductive techniques have demonstrated high success rates, but they come with substantial financial costs and impose a significant burden on the female partner. The invasive procedures and prolonged hormonal treatments often lasting several months contribute to the treatment burden faced by women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. In this regard, supplementation of vitamin D presents a promising avenue for improving semen quality in certain cases of idiopathic male infertility and supports screening of vitamin D and mineral status in cases of idiopathic male infertility. It offers a safe and non-invasive treatment option that could potentially benefit some infertile couples. Moreover, the devastating effect of vitamin D deficiency on semen quality in animal models and human subjects indicates that society should continue to focus on preventing people from having vitamin D deficiency.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank colleagues and peers for constructive discussions while putting this review together.

Financial Support

None.

Conflict of Interest

M. B. J. holds two patents on the use of RANKL inhibitors to treat male infertility. All other authors state no conflict of interest.

Authorship

S. K. Y. and I. M. B. reviewed the literature, wrote the initial draft and had the main responsibility for the preparation of the paper. M. B. J. was responsible for the overall paper design, critical discussions and final approval of the manuscript. In line with the mentioned authors, Z. C., M. J. J., I. K., R. H. and A. J. participated in the discussion and interpretation of the results, critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content and approved the final version.

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally to the study.

References

Boivin, J, Bunting, L, Collins, JA et al. (2007) International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 22, 15061512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2022) World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results, New York, 2022.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Mulgund, A, Hamada, A et al. (2015) A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 13, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirsh, A (2003) Male subfertility. Br Med J 327, 669672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xavier, MJ, Salas-Huetos, A, Oud, MS et al. (2021) Disease gene discovery in male infertility: past, present and future. Hum Genet 140, 719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dohle, GR, Colpi, GM, Hargreave, TB et al. (2019) EAU Guidelines on male infertility. Eur Urol 48, 703711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausz, C (2011) Male infertility: pathogenesis and clinical diagnosis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 25, 271285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, MB (2014) Vitamin D and male reproduction. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10, 175186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomberg Jensen, M (2012) Vitamin D metabolism, sex hormones, and male reproductive function. Reproduction 144, 647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blomberg Jensen, M, Gerner Lawaetz, J, Andersson, AM et al. (2016) Vitamin D deficiency and low ionized calcium are linked with semen quality and sex steroid levels in infertile men. Hum Reprod 31, 18751885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendonca, V (2023) Modern food habits and its impact on human health. Int J Innov Res Eng Manag 10, 182185.Google Scholar
Lieben, L, Carmeliet, G & Masuyama, R (2011) Calcemic actions of vitamin D: effects on the intestine, kidney and bone. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 25, 561572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y, Fang, F, Tang, J et al. (2019) Association between vitamin D supplementation and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 366, l4673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, WB, Lahore, H, McDonnell, SL et al. (2020) Evidence that vitamin D supplementation could reduce risk of influenza and COVID-19 infections and deaths. Nutrients 12, 988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keum, N, Lee, DH, Greenwood, DC et al. (2019) Vitamin D supplementation and total cancer incidence and mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Oncol 30, 733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, R, Juel Mortensen, L, Harpelunde Poulsen, K et al. (2020) Vitamin D and sex steroid production in men with normal or impaired Leydig cell function. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 199, 105589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blomberg Jensen, M, Lawaetz, JG, Petersen, JH et al. (2018) Effects of vitamin D supplementation on semen quality, reproductive hormones, and live birth rate: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103, 870881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blomberg Jensen, M, Nielsen, JE, Jørgensen, A et al. (2010) Vitamin D receptor and vitamin D metabolizing enzymes are expressed in the human male reproductive tract. Hum Reprod 25, 13031311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boisen, IM, Nielsen, JE, Verlinden, L et al. (2021) Calcium transport in male reproduction is possibly influenced by vitamin D and CaSR. J Endocrinol 251, 207222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heller, CG & Clermont, Y (1963) Spermatogenesis in man: an estimate of its duration. Science (1979) 140, 184186.Google Scholar
Sharpe, RM, McKinnell, C, Kivlin, C et al. (2003) Proliferation and functional maturation of Sertoli cells, and their relevance to disorders of testis function in adulthood. Reproduction 125, 769784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Shaughnessy, PJ, Monteiro, A, Verhoeven, G et al. (2010) Effect of FSH on testicular morphology and spermatogenesis in gonadotrophin-deficient hypogonadal mice lacking androgen receptors. Reproduction 139, 177184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarow, JP, Wright, WW, Brown, TR et al. (2005) Bioactivity of androgens within the testes and serum of normal men. J Androl 26, 343348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skakkebaek, NE, Rajpert-De Meyts, E, Buck Louis, GM et al. (2016) Male reproductive disorders and fertility trends: influences of environment and genetic susceptibility. Physiol Rev 96, 5597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, JB, Levine, MA, Bell, NH et al. (2004) Genetic evidence that the human CYP2R1 enzyme is a key vitamin D 25-hydroxylase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 77117715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prosser, DE & Jones, G (2004) Enzymes involved in the activation and inactivation of vitamin D. Trends Biochem Sci 29, 664673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohyama, Y (2004) Eight cytochrome P450s catalyze vitamin D metabolism. Front Biosci 9, 3007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, G, Prosser, DE & Kaufmann, M (2012) 25-Hydroxyvitamin D-24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1): its important role in the degradation of vitamin D. Arch Biochem Biophys 523, 918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, RW, Omdahl, JL, Ghazarian, JG et al. (1972) 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol-1-hydroxylase. J Biol Chem 247, 75287532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouillon, R, Carmeliet, G, Verlinden, L et al. (2008) Vitamin D and human health: lessons from vitamin D receptor null mice. Endocr Rev 29, 726776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuan, Q, Sitara, D, Sato, T et al. (2011) PTH ablation ameliorates the anomalies of Fgf23-deficient mice by suppressing the elevated vitamin D and calcium levels. Endocrinology 152, 40534061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lips, P (2006) Vitamin D physiology. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 92, 48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holick, MF (2006) High prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy and implications for health. Mayo Clin Proc 81, 353373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagakura, K, Abe, E, Suda, T et al. (1986) Inhibitory effect of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the growth of the renal carcinoma cell line. Kidney Int 29, 834840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhary, D, Jansson, I, Stoilov, I et al. (2005) Expression patterns of mouse and human CYP orthologs (families 1–4) during development and in different adult tissues. Arch Biochem Biophys 436, 5061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, JA, Grande, JP, Roche, PC et al. (1996) Immunohistochemical detection and distribution of the 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptor in rat reproductive tissues. Histochem Cell Biol 105, 715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahmoudi, AR, Zarnani, AH, Jeddi-Tehrani, M et al. (2013) Distribution of vitamin D receptor and 1α-hydroxylase in male mouse reproductive tract. Reprod Sci 20, 426436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, AG, Dornas, RAP, Kalapothakis, E et al. (2008) Vitamin D3 and androgen receptors in testis and epididymal region of roosters (Gallus domesticus) as affected by epididymal lithiasis. Anim Reprod Sci 109, 343355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schleicher, G, Privette, TH & Stumpf, WE (1989) Distribution of soltriol [1,25(OH)2-vitamin D3] binding sites in male sex organs of the mouse: an autoradiographic study. J Histochem Cytochem 37, 10831086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbett, ST, Hill, O & Nangia, AK (2006) Vitamin D receptor found in human sperm. Urology 68, 13451349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aquila, S, Guido, C, Perrotta, I et al. (2008) Human sperm anatomy: ultrastructural localization of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptor and its possible role in the human male gamete. J Anat 213, 555564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merke, J, Kreusser, W, Bier, B et al. (1983) Demonstration and characterisation of a testicular receptor for 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol in the rat. Eur J Biochem 130, 303308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanatta, L, Zamoner, A, Zanatta, AP et al. (2011) Nongenomic and genomic effects of 1α,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 in rat testis. Life Sci 89, 515523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanatta, L, Bouraïma-Lelong, H, Delalande, C et al. (2011) Regulation of aromatase expression by 1α,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 in rat testicular cells. Reprod Fertil Dev 23, 725735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akerstrom, VL & Walters, MR (1992) Physiological effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in TM4 Sertoli cell line. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 262, E884E890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majumdar, SS, Bartke, A & Stumpf, WE (1994) Vitamin D modulates the effects of follicle-stimulating hormone of Sertoli cell function and testicular growth in Siberian hamsters. Life Sci 55, 14791486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menegaz, D, Mizwicki, MT, Barrientos-Duran, A et al. (2011) Vitamin D receptor (VDR) regulation of voltage-gated chloride channels by ligands preferring a VDR-alternative pocket (VDR-AP). Mol Endocrinol 25, 12891300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanatta, L, Zamoner, A, Gonçalves, R et al. (2011) 1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D 3 signaling pathways on calcium uptake in 30-day-old rat Sertoli cells. Biochemistry 50, 1028410292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosso, A, Pansera, M, Zamoner, A et al. (2012) 1α,25(OH)2-vitamin D3 stimulates rapid plasma membrane calcium influx via MAPK activation in immature rat Sertoli cells. Biochimie 94, 146154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menegaz, D, Barrientos-Duran, A, Kline, A et al. (2010) 1α,25(OH)2-Vitamin D3 stimulation of secretion via chloride channel activation in Sertoli cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 119, 127134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foresta, C, Strapazzon, G, De Toni, L et al. (2011) Bone mineral density and testicular failure: evidence for a role of vitamin D 25-hydroxylase in human testis. Endocrinology 152, 1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquila, S, Guido, C, Middea, E et al. (2009) Human male gamete endocrinology: 1alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) regulates different aspects of human sperm biology and metabolism. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 7, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomberg Jensen, M, Jørgensen, A, Nielsen, JE et al. (2012) Expression of the vitamin D metabolizing enzyme CYP24A1 at the annulus of human spermatozoa may serve as a novel marker of semen quality. Int J Androl 35, 499510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blomberg Jensen, M, Jørgensen, A, Nielsen, JE et al. (2012) Vitamin D metabolism and effects on pluripotency genes and cell differentiation in testicular germ cell tumors in vitro and in vivo. Neoplasia 14, 952963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirai, T, Tsujimura, A, Ueda, T et al. (2009) Effect of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D on testicular morphology and gene expression in experimental cryptorchid mouse: testis specific cDNA microarray analysis and potential implication in male infertility. J Urol 181, 14871492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwiecinski, GG, Petrie, GI & DeLuca, HF (1989) Vitamin D is necessary for reproductive functions of the male rat. J Nutr 119, 741744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uhland, AM, Kwiecinski, GG & DeLuca, HF (1992) Normalization of serum calcium restores fertility in vitamin D-deficient male rats. J Nutr 122, 13381344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Audet, I, Laforest, J, Martineau, GP et al. (2004) Effect of vitamin supplements on some aspects of performance, vitamin status, and semen quality in boars. The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located at: Effect of vitamin supplement, pp. 626633.Google Scholar
Kinuta, K, Tanaka, H, Moriwake, T et al. (2000) Vitamin D is an important factor in estrogen biosynthesis of both female and male gonads. Endocrinology 141, 13171324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fu, L, Chen, YH, Xu, S et al. (2017) Vitamin D deficiency impairs testicular development and spermatogenesis in mice. Reprod Toxicol 73, 241249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamani, A, Saki, F, Hatami, N et al. (2020) Stereological assessment of the effects of vitamin D deficiency on the rat testis. BMC Endocr Disord 20, 162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shahreza, FD, Hajian, M, Gharagozloo, P et al. (2020) Impact of vitamin D deficiency on mouse sperm structure and function. Andrology 8, 14421455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, W, Chen, L, Zhang, W et al. (2015) Active vitamin D deficiency mediated by extracellular calcium and phosphorus results in male infertility in young mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 308, E51E62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merino, O, Sánchez, R, Gregorio, MB et al. (2019) Effect of high-fat and vitamin D deficient diet on rat sperm quality and fertility. Theriogenology 125, 611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorenzen, M, Boisen, IM, Mortensen, LJ et al. (2017) Reproductive endocrinology of vitamin D. Mol Cell Endocrinol 453, 103112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deng, XL, Li, YM, Yang, XY et al. (2015) Efficacy and safety of vitamin D in the treatment of idiopathic oligoasthenozoospermia. Nat J Androl 20, 10821085.Google Scholar
Padmapriya, D, Archana, R, Sharma, N et al. (2021) Effects of vitamin D3 supplementation in male reproductive function: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Curr Top Nutraceutical Res 20, 334339.Google Scholar
Gheflati, A, Mirjalili, SAM, Kaviani, M et al. (2021) Effects of vitamin D supplementation on semen quality and reproductive hormones in patients with asthenozoospermia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Nutr Food Secur 6, 3142.Google Scholar
Maghsoumi-Norouzabad, L, Zare Javid, A, Mansoori, A et al. (2021) The effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on spermatogram and endocrine factors in asthenozoospermia infertile men: a randomized, triple blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 19, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amini, L, Mohammadbeigi, R, Vafa, M et al. (2020) Evaluation of the effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on quantitative and qualitative parameters of spermograms and hormones in infertile men: a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med 53, 102529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prosser, DE & Jones, G (2004) Enzymes involved in the activation and inactivation of vitamin D. Trends Biochem Sci 29, 664673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akhavizadegan, H & Karbakhsh, M (2017) Comparison of serum vitamin D between fertile and infertile men in a vitamin D deficient endemic area: a case-control study. Urol J 84, 218220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, X, Chan, CPS, Man, GKY et al. (2021) Associations between blood metal/metalloid concentration and human semen quality and sperm function: a cross-sectional study in Hong Kong. J Trace Elem Med Biol 65, 126735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tirabassi, G, Cutini, M, Muscogiuri, G et al. (2017) Association between vitamin D and sperm parameters: clinical evidence. Endocrine 58, 194198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tartagni, M, Matteo, M, Baldini, D et al. (2015) Males with low serum levels of vitamin D have lower pregnancy rates when ovulation induction and timed intercourse are used as a treatment for infertile couples: results from a pilot study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 13, 127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidroni, G, Har-Nir, R, Menczel, J et al. (1983) Vitamin D3 metabolites in rat epididymis: high 24,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 levels in the cauda region. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 113, 982989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clapham, DE (2007) Calcium signaling. Cell 131, 10471058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baird, GS (2011) Ionized calcium. Clin Chim Acta 412, 696701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, EM, Gamba, G, Riccardi, D et al. (1993) Cloning and characterization of an extracellular Ca2+-sensing receptor from bovine parathyroid. Nature 366, 575580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, C, Conner, DA, Pollak, MR et al. (1995) A mouse model of human familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia and neonatal severe hyperparathyroidism. Nat Genet 11, 389394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boisen, IM, Mos, I, Lerche-Black, EM et al. (2020) Heterozygous mutation (Q459R) in the calcium-sensing receptor gene causes familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia 1 (FHH1). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105, e1322e1330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoenderop, JGJ, Nilius, B & Bindels, RJM (2005) Calcium absorption across epithelia. Physiol Rev 85, 373422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VanHouten, JN & Wysolmerski, JJ (2007) Transcellular calcium transport in mammary epithelial cells. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 12, 223235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loupy, A, Ramakrishnan, SK, Wootla, B et al. (2012) PTH-independent regulation of blood calcium concentration by the calcium-sensing receptor. J Clin Invest 122, 33553367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimke, H, Desai, P, Borovac, J et al. (2013) Activation of the Ca2+-sensing receptor increases renal claudin-14 expression and urinary Ca2+ excretion. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 304, F761F769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, T, Courbebaisse, M, Ide, N et al. (2017) Parathyroid hormone controls paracellular Ca2+ transport in the thick ascending limb by regulating the tight-junction protein claudin14. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114, E3344E3353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clulow, J, Jones, R & Hansen, L (1994) Micropuncture and cannulation studies of fluid composition and transport in the ductuli efferentes testis of the rat: comparisons with the homologous metanephric proximal tubule. Exp Physiol 79, 915928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blomberg Jensen, M, Bjerrum, PJ, Jessen, TE et al. (2011) Vitamin D is positively associated with sperm motility and increases intracellular calcium in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 26, 13071317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, DH & Katz, DF (2005) A review of the physical and chemical properties of human semen and the formulation of a semen simulant. J Androl 26, 459469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, WCL & Harrison, A (1984) The role of citrate in determining the activity of calcium ions in human semen. Int J Androl 7, 198202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magnus, Ø, Åbyholm, T, Kofstad, J et al. (1990) Ionized calcium in human male and female reproductive fluids: relationships to sperm motility. Hum Reprod 5, 9498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adamopoulos, DA & Deliyiannis, V (1983) Seminal plasma magnesium, calcium and inorganic phosphate concentration in normozoospermic and subfertile men. Andrologia 15, 648654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
N'Guessan, MF, Yaye, YG, Coulibaly, FA et al. (2016) Evaluation of minerals in the seminal plasma of azoospermic semen. Int J Biomed Res 7, 711.Google Scholar
Sørensen, MB, Bergdahl, IA, Hjøllund, NHI et al. (1999) Zinc, magnesium and calcium in human seminal fluid: relations to other semen parameters and fertility. Mol Hum Reprod 5, 331337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prien, SD, Lox, CD, Messer, RH et al. (1990) Seminal concentrations of total and ionized calcium from men with normal and decreased motility. Fertil Steril 54, 171172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salsabili, N, Mehrsai, AR & Jalaie, S (2009) Concentration of blood and seminal plasma elements and their relationships with semen parameters in men with spinal cord injury. Andrologia 41, 2428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kılıç, S, Sarıca, K, Yaman, Ö et al. (1996) Effect of total and ionized calcium levels of seminal fluid on sperm motility. Urol Int 56, 215218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umeyama, T, Ishikawa, H, Takeshima, H et al. (1986) A comparative study of seminal trace elements in fertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril 46, 494499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abou-Shakra, FR, Ward, NI & Everard, DM (1989) The role of trace elements in male infertility. Fertil Steril 52, 307310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arver, S & Sjöberg, HE (1982) Calcium fractions in seminal plasma and functional properties of human spermatozoa. Acta Physiol Scand 116, 159165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, AD, Lechene, CP & Howards, SS (1980) Concentrations of seven elements in the intraluminal fluids of the rat seminiferous tubules, rete testis, and epididymis. Biol Reprod 23, 981987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, AD, Lechene, CP & Howards, SS (1983) The effect of estrogen administration in vivo on the elemental composition of the intraluminal fluids of the seminiferous tubules, rete testis, and epididymis of the rat. J Androl 4, 272275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boisen, IM, Hansen, LB, Mortensen, LJ et al. (2017) Vitamin D, Reproductive Biology, and Dysfunction in Men, vol. 1, 4th ed. Vitamin D.Google Scholar
Boisen, IM, Rehfeld, A, Mos, I et al. (2021) The calcium-sensing receptor is essential for calcium and bicarbonate sensitivity in human spermatozoa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 106, e1775e1792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, D & Ostermeier, GC (2006) Towards a better understanding of RNA carriage by ejaculate spermatozoa. Hum Reprod Update 12, 757767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellastella, G, Cooper, TG, Battaglia, M et al. (2010) Dimensions of human ejaculated spermatozoa in papanicolaou-stained seminal and swim-up smears obtained from the integrated semen analysis system (ISAS®). Asian J Androl 12, 871879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Publicover, S, Harper C, V & Barratt, C (2007) [Ca2+]i signalling in sperm – making the most of what you've got. Nat Cell Biol 9, 235242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, MC, Brown, SG, Costello, SM et al. (2018) Single-cell analysis of [Ca2+]i signalling in sub-fertile men: characteristics and relation to fertilization outcome. Hum Reprod 33, 10231033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, HL, Mansell, S, Alasmari, W et al. (2015) Specific loss of CatSper function is sufficient to compromise fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 30, 27372746.Google ScholarPubMed
Alasmari, W, Barratt, CLR, Publicover, SJ et al. (2018) The clinical significance of calcium–signalling pathways mediating human sperm hyperactivation. Hum Reprod 28, 866876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, FJ, Perez-Marin, CC, Garcia-Marin, L et al. (2012) Localization, distribution, and function of the calcium-sensing receptor in sperm. J Androl 33, 96104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kong, W-Y, Tong, L-Q, Zhang, H-J et al. (2015) The calcium-sensing receptor participates in testicular damage in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Asian J Androl 17, 16.Google Scholar
Macías-García, B, Rocha, A & González-Fernández, L (2016) Extracellular calcium regulates protein tyrosine phosphorylation through calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) in stallion sperm. Mol Reprod Dev 83, 236245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, YJ, Yan, J, Yin, F et al. (2017) Role of autophagy in cadmium-induced testicular injury. Hum Exp Toxicol 36, 10391048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, C, Liu, Y, Larsen, K et al. (2018) Calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) is involved in porcine in vitro fertilisation and early embryo development. Reprod Fertil Dev 30, 391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macías-García, B, García-Marín, LJ, Bragado, MJ et al. (2019) The calcium-sensing receptor regulates protein tyrosine phosphorylation through PDK1 in boar spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev 86, 751761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellinger, I (2016) The calcium-sensing receptor and the reproductive system. Front Physiol 7, 371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, R, Sengar, G, Singh, U et al. (2018) Functional proteomic analysis of crossbred (Holstein Friesian × Sahiwal) bull spermatozoa. Reprod Domest Anim 53, 588608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wen, N, Yu, MF, Liu, J et al. (2018) Deficiency of MTMR14 impairs male fertility in Mus musculus. PLoS ONE 13, e0206224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shambharkar, PB, Bittinger, M, Latario, B et al. (2015) TMEM203 is a novel regulator of intracellular calcium homeostasis and is required for spermatogenesis. PLoS ONE 10, 125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niemeyer, J, Mentrup, T, Heidasch, R et al. (2019) The intramembrane protease SPPL2c promotes male germ cell development by cleaving phospholamban. EMBO Rep 20, 120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okunade, GW, Miller, ML, Pyne, GJ et al. (2004) Targeted ablation of plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase (PMCA) 1 and 4 indicates a major housekeeping function for PMCA1 and a critical role in hyperactivated sperm motility and male fertility for PMCA4. J Biol Chem 279, 3374233750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, V, Okunade, GW, Miller, ML et al. (2004) Phenotypes of SERCA and PMCA knockout mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 322, 11921203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissgerber, P, Kriebs, U, Tsvilovskyy, V et al. (2011) Male fertility depends on Ca2+ absorption by TRPV6 in epididymal epithelia. Sci Signal 4, ra27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, H, Zhang, BL, Liu, BY et al. (2019) Vitamin K2-dependent GGCX and MGP are required for homeostatic calcium regulation of sperm maturation. iScience 14, 210225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oury, F, Ferron, M, Huizhen, W et al. (2013) Osteocalcin regulates murine and human fertility through a pancreas–bone–testis axis. J Clin Invest 123, 24212433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oury, F, Sumara, G, Sumara, O et al. (2011) Endocrine regulation of male fertility by the skeleton. Cell 144, 796809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blomberg Jensen, M, Andreassen, CH, Jørgensen, A et al. (2021) RANKL regulates male reproductive function. Nat Commun 12, 115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bøllehuus Hansen, L, Kaludjerovic, J, Nielsen, JE et al. (2020) Influence of FGF23 and Klotho on male reproduction: systemic vs direct effects. FASEB J 34, 1243612449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaupp, UB & Strünker, T (2017) Signaling in sperm: more different than similar. Trends Cell Biol 27, 101109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huynh, T (2002) Selected genetic factors associated with male infertility. Hum Reprod Update 8, 183198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juel Mortensen, L, Lorenzen, M, Jorgensen, N et al. (2019) Possible link between FSH and RANKL release from adipocytes in men with impaired gonadal function including Klinefelter syndrome. Bone 123, 103114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valsa, J, Skandhan, KP, Sumangala, B et al. (2016) Time bound changes (in 24 h) in human sperm motility and level of calcium and magnesium in seminal plasma. Alexandria J Med 52, 235241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, H, Miao, M, Chen, J et al. (2016) The association between calcium, magnesium, and ratio of calcium/magnesium in seminal plasma and sperm quality. Biol Trace Elem Res 174, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirsch, IH, Jeyendran, RS, Sedor, J et al. (1991) Biochemical analysis of electroejaculates in spinal cord injured Men: comparison to normal ejaculates. J Urol 145, 7376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kavanagh, JP (1985) Sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, citrate and chloride content of human prostatic and seminal fluid. Reproduction 75, 3541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuh, K, Cartwright, EJ, Jankevics, E et al. (2004) Plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPase 4 is required for sperm motility and male fertility. J Biol Chem 279, 28220–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, LB, Rehfeld, A, De Neergaard, R et al. (2017) Selection of high-quality spermatozoa may be promoted by activated vitamin D in the woman. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102, 950961.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Six studies investigating the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and fertility in rodents

Figure 1

Table 2. Interventional studies of vitamin D and semen quality in infertile men

Figure 2

Table 3. Studies investigating ionised and total calcium levels in human seminal fluid/plasma

Figure 3

Fig. 1. Calcium and vitamin D in the male reproductive tract. (A) Seminal fluid concentration relative to serum concentration of calcium, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) and 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (24,25(OH)2D3) in men. Dotted lines represent the detection limit in seminal fluid, solid lines represent the constant concentration in seminal fluid and grey solid lines represent the undetectable levels in seminal fluid. The figure is based on data presented in(19,138). (B) The concentration of calcium and vitamin D in the intraluminal fluid of rodent epididymis relative to the serum concentration. In caput, the 25OHD concentration is 15× lower and 11× lower in cauda compared with serum levels. The calcium concentration is 2× higher in caput and 4× lower in cauda. The figure is based on data presented in(76,101,102).

Figure 4

Table 4. Mouse knockout models that impact local calcium homoeostasis in the male reproductive tract