Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:55:07.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attitudes and beliefs towards meat substitute products among adult male omnivores in the republic of Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2022

S. Corcoran
Affiliation:
Atlantic Technological University, Sligo, Ireland.
A. Mullee
Affiliation:
Atlantic Technological University, Sligo, Ireland.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2022

The growing worldwide population has led to an increase in food consumption and adequate changes to food systems are necessary to improve global sustainability(Reference Steffen, Richardson and Rockstrom1). The EAT Lancet report highlights the need for a sustainable food system to protect the ecosystem and prevent premature adult deaths. A planetary diet is recommended including high consumption of fruit, vegetables, nuts, legumes, and reduced dairy and meat(Reference Willett, Rockstrom and Loken2). In Ireland meat is consumed by 98% of the adult population, and on average red meat intake is high and levels of processed meat exceed recommendations(3). Meat substitutes provide a dietary alternative to aid in reducing meat consumption(Reference Eckl, Bessbrook and Van't Veer4). Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the attitudes and knowledge towards meat substitute products among adult male omnivores in the Republic of Ireland. This qualitative study was conducted through online and in-person semi-structured interviews, with quantitative data collected through an online demographic and health questionnaire prior to interview commencement. Adult male omnivores living in the Republic of Ireland, were eligible to participate. Participants were asked four open- ended questions on their attitudes and knowledge of meat substitute products as part of a larger study. All interview data collected was recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically (Reference Clarke and Braun5). Ethical approval was granted by the Department of Health and Nutritional Sciences Research Ethics Committee (REF: HPP2020102).

Thirteen males aged between 18–65 years old were interviewed. Four of the main themes identified are: sensory preferences towards meat substitutes, where a desire for sensory aspects of meat substitutes to replicate meat products was highlighted “once it tastes and looks the same then I'd probably be happy”; negative attitudes towards meat substitute consumption, presented a prevalence of reluctancy “I don't see the point”; barriers towards meat substitute consumption, highlighted issues regarding hesitancy and lack of education on products “if there was more information out there, I would certainly give them a chance yeah”; and positive attitudes towards meat substitutes, was prevalent as a minority of candidates were willing to consume such products “I'd have no problem, in trying it you know”. In conclusion, despite mixed experiences and attitudes towards meat substitute products there appears to be a hesitancy to incorporate them into regular diets. Providing opportunities to try a range of products and improving knowledge may encourage the transition to a healthier diet.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank my family and thesis supervisor for their support and guidance.

References

Steffen, W, Richardson, K, Rockstrom, J, et al. (2015) Science 347, 1259855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willett, W, Rockstrom, J, Loken, B, et al. (2019) Lancet 393, 447492CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IUNA (2011) IUNAGoogle Scholar
Eckl, MR, Bessbrook, S, Van't Veer, P, et al. (2021) Nutrients 13, 3602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, V & Braun, V (2013), SAGE publicationsGoogle Scholar