Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:03:44.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are vegetarians susceptible to primary cardiovascular disease, due to a lack or absence of dietary animal produce?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2013

D. Obersby
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Social Work and Human Sciences, University of West London, Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GA, UK
D. C. Chappell
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Social Work and Human Sciences, University of West London, Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GA, UK
A. A. Tsiami
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Social Work and Human Sciences, University of West London, Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GA, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013

There are approximately four million vegetarians within the UK population( 1 ). Worldwide there are 75 million vegetarians by choice and 1450 million by necessity( 2 ). Whilst the vegetarian diet is accepted as a protection against cardiovascular disease, probably due to reduced saturated fat, lower cholesterol, lower prevalence of obesity and slightly lower blood pressure, there is however a high probability that it is deficient in vitamin B12 due to a lack or absence of dietary animal produce, which can elevate homocysteine( Reference Selhub 3 ). This potentially dangerous sulphur containing amino acid, which is produced in every cell of the body, is capable of causing cellular damage, which includes the arterial endothelium that can enhance thrombogenicity( Reference Welch and Loscal 4 ). There is indeed strong evidence indicating that elevated plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) levels are a contributor to chronic conditions, such as primary coronary heart disease (CHD)( Reference Selhub 3 ) and stroke( Reference McNulty 5 ).

The object of the study was to stratify a range of acceptable cohort studies that compare the plasma tHcy and serum vitamin B12 status of vegetarians and omnivores and to compile a systematic review and meta-analysis of which to-date there is no record of any publication.

Search methods employed identified 244 (2958 participants) entries from which by screening, using criteria revealed sixteen eligible cohort case study publications from 1999 to 2010 that compared the concentrations of plasma tHcy and serum vitamin B12 of omnivores, lactovegetarians or lactoovovegetarians (LV-LOV's) and vegans.

A further object was to focus on the relationship between levels of plasma tHcy and the risk of developing CHD. These findings are summarised in Figure 1.

Fig. 1. Relative risk of CHD compared to plasma tHcy( Reference Robinson 6 Reference Humphrey8 ).

Figure 2 confirms that an inverse relationship exists between plasma tHcy and serum vitamin B12. The meta-analysis revealed that vegans have a mean plasma tHcy of 16.4 μmol/L with a corresponding mean serum vitamin B12 of 172 pmol/L compared to LV-LOV's mean plasma tHcy of 14.0 μmol/L and mean serum vitamin B12 of 198 pmol/L. Omnivores mean plasma tHcy was 10.9 μmol/L and mean serum vitamin B12 of 303 pmol/L. Comparing these findings with Figure 1 it was concluded that the odds ratio of the risk of CHD for these diet groups are 5.6, 4.8 and 2.1 respectively.

Fig. 2. Relationship between plasma tHcy and serum vitamin B12 for omnivores, LV-LOV's and vegans.

References

3. Selhub, J. (1999) Ann Rev Nutr 19, 217246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Welch, GN and Loscal, J. (1998) New Eng J Med 338, 10421050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. McNulty, H et al. (2012) Proc Nutr Soc 71, 213222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Robinson, K et al. (1995) Circulation 92, 28252830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Ubbink, JB. (2001) Cam Uni Press 485–90.Google Scholar
8. Humphrey, LL, et al. (2008) Mayo Clin Proc 83(11), 12031212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Relative risk of CHD compared to plasma tHcy(68).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Relationship between plasma tHcy and serum vitamin B12 for omnivores, LV-LOV's and vegans.