Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T10:19:35.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pseudo-Science in Musical “Theory.”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Get access

Extract

It was in the nineteenth century that pseudo-scientific speculation about music, described in this quotation, reached its high-water mark. It was then, as Sir Donald Tovey has remarked elsewhere, that “in England Rameau's doctrine raged unchecked by taste or common sense, and culminated in Dr. Day's famous application of homoeopathy to the art of music.” If with the advance of scientific knowledge, and a sounder sense of musical scholarship based on fuller acquaintance with the history of music, these speculations are generally ignored to-day, it is still possible to find traces of them in some modern writing. There has indeed been some recrudescence of them in attempts, by contributors to musical literature, to discover an explanation for some of the changes which composers are now bringing about. I am thinking particularly of “theoretical” discussion of the basis of the twelve-note semitonal technique. It will therefore be my purpose, this afternoon, to probe into this would-be theory, if” only because modern composition must stand or fall by its own musical merits, without the intrusion of “pseudo-scientific speculation.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Musical Association, 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Integrity of Music, p. 45.Google Scholar

2 Encyclopedia Britannica 14th ed. article “Harmony.”Google Scholar

3 The Integrity of Music, p. 23.Google Scholar

4 Sensations of Tone, 2nd Eng. ed., p. 229.Google Scholar

5 See, e.g., Proc. Mus. Assoc. (1940), LXVI, p. 38, and “Just Intonation Misconceived,” Music and Letters, July 1943.Google Scholar

6 Proc. Mus. Assoc. (1940) LXVI, p. 37.Google Scholar

7 Proc. Mus. Assoc. (1940) LXVI, p. 46.Google Scholar

8 J. Roy. Soc. Arts, 1942, No. 4619, p. 581.Google Scholar

9 Ibid, p. 590.Google Scholar

10 A fuller description of this aspect of the Greek ideas of music was given in J. Roy. Soc. Arts, 1942, No. 4619, p. 582.Google Scholar

11 Science and the Modern World, p. 5.Google Scholar

12 Ibid., p. 6.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., p. 3.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., p. 18.Google Scholar

15 Proc. Mus. Assoc. (1875). I, 163.Google Scholar

16 Sensations of Tone, 1st ed., p. 759, 2nd ed., p. 463.Google Scholar

17 The Integrity of Music, p. 8.Google Scholar

18 Sensations of Tone, 1st ed. p. 383, 2nd ed. p. 249.Google Scholar

19 Down among the Dead Men, p. 226.Google Scholar

20 Full score p. 41 (at G) and p. 48 (after L).Google Scholar

21 This is confirmed by Helmholtz quoting French researches, and by Fox Strangways in the article “Interval” in Grove's Dictionary.Google Scholar