Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:35:53.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unveiling the Multiple and Complex Faces of Fidelity

Part of: Design Methods and Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Lorenzo Fiorineschi  and
Federico Rotini

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fidelity is one of the most important parameters to consider when dealing with prototypes, which affect the related costs and performances. Current literature contributions often rely on generic definitions of Fidelity based on the concept of closeness. However, the review performed in this paper revealed that Fidelity is a more complex concept, which considers (at least) eight main dimensions, mutually interrelated, and potentially characterized by many other potential sub-dimensions. The identified set has been applied to an industrial case study were a real engineering prototype has been assessed in terms of Fidelity. In particular, the case study application shows how the different dimensions can be interrelated each other. Furthermore, some important research hints have been highlighted in this paper, where the identified set of Fidelity dimensions paves the way for the related future activities.

Keywords

PrototypingFidelityDesign practiceDesign for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)Case study
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 1723 - 1732
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Bao, Q., Faas, D. and Yang, M. (2018), “Interplay of sketching & prototyping in early stage product design”, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 0349, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Bonner, J.V. and Van Schaik, P. (1998), “The use of high and low level prototyping methods for product user interfaces”, Contemporary Ergonomics, pp. 253–257.Google Scholar
Bordegoni, M., Ferrise, F., Wendrich, R. and Barone, S. (2018), “Virtual and Mixed Prototyping Techniques and Technologies for Consumer Product Design Within a Blended Learning Design Environment”, International Design Conference - Design 2018, pp. 183–192.10.21278/idc.2018.0428Google Scholar
Buchenau, M., Francisco, I.S. and Suri, J.F. (2000), “Experience Prototyping”, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, pp. 424–433.10.1145/347642.347802Google Scholar
Camburn, B.A., Dunlap, B., Gurjar, T., Hamon, C., Green, M., Jensen, D., Crawford, R., et al. (2015), “A Systematic Method for Design Prototyping”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 137 No. 8, p. 081102.10.1115/1.4030331Google Scholar
Camburn, B.A., Viswanathan, V.K., Linsey, J., Anderson, D., Jensen, D., Crawford, R., Otto, K., et al. (2017), “Design prototyping methods: state of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines”, Design Science, Vol. 3 No. e13, available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.10.Google Scholar
Carfagni, M., Fiorineschi, L., Furferi, R., Governi, L. and Rotini, F. (2018), “The Role of Additive Technologies in the Prototyping Issues of Design”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 24 No. 7, pp. 1101–1116.10.1108/RPJ-02-2017-0021Google Scholar
Duncan, B., David, M. and Ben, H. (2017), “Evolving lego: Prototyping requirements for a customizable construction kit”, 21st International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2017, Vol. 4, pp. 297–306.Google Scholar
Elverum, C.W., Welo, T. and Tronvoll, S. (2016), “Prototyping in new product development : Strategy considerations”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50, The Author(s), pp. 117–122.10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.010Google Scholar
Exner, K., Lindow, K., Stark, R., Stark, R., Bähr, B. and Nagy, E. (2015), “A transdisciplinary perspective on prototyping”, IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/International Technology Management Conference (ICE/ITMC).10.1109/ICE.2015.7438659Google Scholar
Gerber, E. and Carroll, M. (2012), “The psychological experience of prototyping”, Design Studies, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 64–84.10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.005Google Scholar
Hallgrimsson, B. (2012), Prototyping and Model Making for Product Design, Laurence King Publishing Ltd, London, available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.Google Scholar
Hannah, R., Joshi, S. and Summers, J.D. (2012), “A user study of interpretability of engineering design representations”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 443–468.10.1080/09544828.2011.615302Google Scholar
Hare, J., Gill, S., Loudon, G. and Lewis, A. (2014), “Active and passive physicality: making the most of low fidelity physical interactive prototypes”, J. Design Research, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 330–348.10.1504/JDR.2014.065847Google Scholar
Hess, T. and Summers, J.D. (2013), “Case study: Evidence of prototyping roles in conceptual design”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED13, Vol. 1 DS75-01, pp. 249–258.Google Scholar
Hilton, E., Linsey, J. and Goodman, J. (2015), “Understanding the prototyping strategies of experienced designers”, Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, Vol. 2014, available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344060.Google Scholar
Houde, S. and Hill, C. (1997), “What do prototypes prototype?”, in M., H., T., L. and P., P. (Eds.), Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Isa, S.S. and Liem, A. (2014), “Classifying Physical Models and Prototypes in the Design Design Process: a Study on the Economical and Usability Impact of Adopting Models and Prototypes in the Design Process”, Proceedings of the 13th International Design Conference DESIGN 2014, pp. 2071–2082.Google Scholar
Isa, S.S., Liem, A. and Steinert, M. (2015), “The Value of Prototypes in the Early Design and Development Process”, 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Jensen, L.S., Nissen, L., Bilde, N. and Özkil, A.G. (2018), “Prototyping in Mechatronic Product Development: How Prototype Fidelity Levels Affect User Design Input”, International Design Conference - Design 2018, pp. 1173–1184.10.21278/idc.2018.0415Google Scholar
Jensen, L.S., Özkil, A.G. and Mortensen, N.H. (2016), “Prototypes in Engineering Design : Definitions and Strategies”, INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE - DESIGN 2016, pp. 821–830.Google Scholar
Jensen, M.B., Elverum, C.W. and Steinert, M. (2017), “Eliciting unknown unknowns with prototypes: Introducing prototrials and prototrial-driven cultures”, Design Studies, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 49, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Lim, Y., Pangam, A., Periyasami, S. and Aneja, S. (2006), “Comparative Analysis of High- and Low-fidelity Prototypes for More Valid Usability Evaluations of Mobile Devices”, Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles. ACM, pp. 14–18.10.1145/1182475.1182506Google Scholar
Mathias, D., Hicks, B., Snider, C. and Ranscombe, C. (2018), “Characterizing the Affordances and Limitations of Common Prototyping Techniques to Support the Early Stages of Product Development”, International Design Conference - Design 2018, pp. 1257–1268.10.21278/idc.2018.0445Google Scholar
McCurdy, M., Connors, C., Pyrzak, G., Kanefsky, B., Vera, A. and Field, M. (2006), “Breaking the Fidelity Barrier: An Examination of our Current Characterization of Prototypes and an Example of a Mixed-Fidelity Success”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1233–1242.10.1145/1124772.1124959Google Scholar
Mckenzie, D. (2015), “Generative Prototype Iteration in the Front End of the Design Process”, DS82: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE15), pp. 272–277.Google Scholar
Menold, J., Jablokow, K. and Simpson, T. (2017), “Prototype for X (PFX): A holistic framework for structuring prototyping methods to support engineering design”, Design Studies, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 50, pp. 70–112.10.1016/j.destud.2017.03.001Google Scholar
Mueller, S., Im, S., Gurevich, S., Teibrich, A., Pfisterer, L., Guimbretière, F. and Baudisch, P. (2014), “WirePrint: 3D printed previews for fast prototyping”, UIST ‘14: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Honolulu, pp. 273–280.10.1145/2642918.2647359Google Scholar
O'Hare, J.A., Dekoninck, E., Giunta, L., Boujut, J. and Becattini, N. (2018), “Exploring the Performance of Augmented Reality Technologies in Co- Creative Sessions : Initial Results From Controlled Experiments”, International Design Conference - Design 2018, pp. 405–416.Google Scholar
Ranscombe, C., Bissett-Johnson, K., Boa, D. and Hicks, B. (2017), “Designing with lego: Exploring the influence of low fidelity visualisation on collaborative design activities”, 21st International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2017, Vol. 8 No. DS87-8, pp. 269–278.Google Scholar
Rudd, J., Stern, K. and Isensee, S. (1996), “Low vs. high-fidelity prototyping debate”, Interactions, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 76–85.10.1145/223500.223514Google Scholar
Sauer, J., Franke, H. and Ruettinger, B. (2008), “Designing interactive consumer products: Utility of paper prototypes and effectiveness of enhanced control labelling”, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 71–85.10.1016/j.apergo.2007.03.001Google Scholar
Sauer, J., Seibel, K. and Ruttinger, B. (2010), “The influence of user expertise and prototype fidelity in usability tests”, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 130–140.10.1016/j.apergo.2009.06.003Google Scholar
Ullman, D.G. (2010), The Mechanical Design Process 4th Ed., Mc Graw HIll, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (2012), “Product Design and Development”, 5th ed., Mc Graw Hill Irwin, New York, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-8985-4.00002-4.Google Scholar
Virzi, R.A. (1989), “What can you learn from a low-fidelity prototype?”, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 224–228.10.1177/154193128903300405Google Scholar
Wall, M.B., Ulrich, K.T. and Flowers, W.C. (1992), “Evaluating Prototyping Technologies for Product Design”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 3, pp. 163–177.10.1007/BF01580518Google Scholar
Yang, M.C. (2004), “An Examination of Prototyping and Design Outcome”, Proceedings of DETC 2004 2004 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, pp. 1–6.10.1115/DETC2004-57552Google Scholar
Zink, L., Böhmer, A.I., Hostetter, R., Lindemann, U. and Knoll, A. (2017), “The use of prototypes within agile product development Explorative Case Study of a Makeathon”, International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), pp. 68–77.10.1109/ICE.2017.8279871Google Scholar