Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:05:51.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Promoting Eco-Innovation in Academic Eco-Systems

Part of: Responsible Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Gwenola Yannou-Le Bris ,
Romane Jubera ,
Annika Olsson  and
Marianne Cerf
Gwenola Yannou-Le Bris*
Affiliation:
AgroParisTech;
Romane Jubera
Affiliation:
AgroParisTech;
Annika Olsson
Affiliation:
Lund University;
Marianne Cerf
Affiliation:
INRA
*
Contact: Yannou-Le Bris, Gwenola AgroParisTech, Laboratoire Génie Industriel, France, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

University incubators are an opportunity to promote the dissemination of research, change teaching practices and contribute to territorial economic development. In this article we present a structural and dynamic analysis of such an innovation system of a Swedish eco-innovation system by proposing elements for analysing the success of such innovation systems.

Keywords

IncubationDesign educationWorkspaces for designOpen source design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 3361 - 3370
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Aernoudt, R. (2004), “Incubators: Tool for Entrepreneurship?”, Small Business Economics Studies, Vol. 23, pp. 127–135. http://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000027665.54173.23Google Scholar
Baraldi, E. and Ingemansson Havendid, M. (2016), “Identifying new dimensions of business incubation: A multi-level analysis of Karolinska Institute's incubation system”, Technovation, Vol. 50, pp. 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.003Google Scholar
Bergek, A. and Norrman, C. (2008), “Incubator best practice: A framework”, Technovation, Vol. 28, pp. 20–28. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.008Google Scholar
Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B. and Groen, A. (2012), “The Evolution of Business Incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations”, Technovation, Vol. 32, pp. 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.003Google Scholar
Carayannis, E.G., Barth, T.D. and Campbell, D.F. (2005), “The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation”, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H.W. (2003), Technovation Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Mass, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar
Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO (2018), The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation, Knowledge editors, Geneva.Google Scholar
EC (2018), European Innovation Scoreboard, Retrieved from European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_enGoogle Scholar
Grimaldi, R. and Grandi, A. (2005), “Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models”, Technovation, Vol. 24, pp. 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00076-2Google Scholar
Hackett, S.M. and Dilts, D. (2004), “A systematic review of business incubation research”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 29, pp. 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011181.11952.0fGoogle Scholar
Hausberg, J.P. and Korreck, S. (2018), “Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 23, pp. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9651-yGoogle Scholar
OECD (2010), The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow of Report, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
OECD (2015), The Innovation Imperative: Contributing to Productivity, Growth and Well-Being, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
SMEEC Swedish Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications (2012), The Global Innovation Index 2018, The Swedish Innovation Strategy. Government offices of Sweden.Google Scholar
Theodorakopoulos, N., Kakabdse, N. and Mcgowan, C. (2014), “What matters in business incubation? A literature review and a suggestion suggestion for situated theorising”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 602–622. http://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-09-2014-0152Google Scholar
Villarreal, O. and Calvo, N. (2015), “From the Triple Helix model to the Global Open Innovation model: A case study based on international cooperation for innovation in Dominican Republic”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 35, pp. 71–92. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2014.10.002Google Scholar
Yannou-Le Bris, G. and Serhan, H. (2018), “The knowledge value chain for eco-design and eco-innovation in food - Case study of ECOTROPHELIA projects”, In: innovation, R.d.R.s., (Ed.), 8th Forum Innovation, Nîmes.Google Scholar