Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:43:13.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Product Developer in the Centre of Product Development: A Systematic Literature Review on Describing Factors

Part of: Human Behaviour in Design and Design Cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Albert Albers ,
Jonas Heimicke ,
Markus Spadinger ,
Nadine Degner  and
Katharina Duehr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the uncertain process of product development, the developer is decisively responsible for product success. He operates in a complex environment that directly influences his synthesis and analysis activities. The context of the socio-technical system of product development has already been extensively researched and defined by a large number of factors. However, the developer is described as part of the context and not as the centre, which means that many of these factors have no interaction with the developer. For the design of methods and tools that support the developer in his activities in the development process, a summarizing understanding of the influences on and by the developer is necessary. In order to create a unified understanding of the developer at the centre of product development, a Systematic Literature Review was conducted. In this article, the procedure and findings are presented. The aim was to identify factors from the literature that significantly influence the interaction of the developer in his environment. As a result, these were documented in a model, which represents the basis for further, human-centred research in the context of product development.

Keywords

Design engineeringHuman behaviour in designDesign processASD - Agile Systems DesignSocio-technical system
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 1843 - 1852
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Albers, A. and Braun, A. (2011), “A generalised framework to compass and to support complex product engineering processes”, International Journal of Product Development, Vol. 15 No. 1/3, pp. 6–25, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2011.043659.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Denkena, B., Matthiesen, S., Dengler, B., Hoppen, P., Marxen, L., et al. (2012): “Faszination Konstruktion – Berufsbild und Tätigkeitsfeld im Wandel. In: Acatech Studie, ISBN 978-3-642-31930-3.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Walter, B., Basedow, G.N., Reiß, N., Heitger, N., Ott, S. and Bursac, N. (2018), “Product Profiles. Modelling customer benefits as a foundation to bring inventions to innovations”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 70 No. 1, pp. 253–258, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.02.044.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Spadinger, M., Reiss, N., Breitschuh, J., Richter, T., Bursac, N. and Marthaler, F. (2019), “Eine Systematik zur situationsadäquaten Mechatroniksystementwicklung durch ASD – Agile Systems Design”, in KIT Scientific Working Papers, Vol. 113, KIT, Karlsruhe. https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000091847.Google Scholar
Albers, A. and Lohmeyer, Q. (2012), “Advanced Systems Engineering – Towards a Model-Based and Human-Centered Methodology”, in Horváth, I. (Ed.), Tools and methods of competitive engineering: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering, TMCE 2012, Delft, pp. 407–416.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Lomeyer, Q. and Ebel, B. (2011), “DIMENSIONS OF OBJECTIVES IN INTERDISCIPLINARY PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN”, ICED11, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Reiß, N., Bursac, N. and Breitschuh, J. (2016), “15 Years of SPALTEN Problem Solving Methodology in Product Development”, in Boks, C. (Ed.), Proceedings of NordDesign 2016: August 10-12, 2016, Trondheim, Norway, The Design Society, Bristol, United Kingdom, pp. 411–420.Google Scholar
Albers, A., Reiß, N., Bursac, N., Urbanec, J. and Lüdcke, R. (2014), “Situation-appropriate method selection in product development process – empirical study of method application”, Proceedings of NordDesign 2014 Conference, pp. 550–559.Google Scholar
Badke-Schaub, P. and Frankenberger, E. (2004): Management Kritischer Situationen. Produktentwicklung erfolgreich gestalten. Springer (VDI-Buch), Berlin, Heidelberg. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18702-5.Google Scholar
Bavendiek, A.-K., Huth, T., Inkermann, D., Paulsen, H., Vietor, T. and Kauffeld, S. (2018), “Collaborative Design: Linking Methods, Communication Tools and Competencies to Processes”, in Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference; The Design Society, Glasgow, UK, pp. 149–160, http://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0420.Google Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a design research methodology, Springer, Dordrecht, London, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1.Google Scholar
Bucher, T. and Dinter, B. (2012), “Situational Method Engineering to Support Process-Oriented Information Logistics”, Journal of Database Management, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 31–48, http://doi.org/10.4018/jdm.2012010102.Google Scholar
Buckl, S., Matthes, F. and Schweda, C.M. (2014), “Socio-technic Dependency and Rationale Models for the Enterprise Architecture Management Function”, in Bayro-Corrochano, E. and Hancock, E. (Eds.), Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis, Computer Vision, and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8827, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 528–540, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22056-2_54.Google Scholar
Costa, R. and Sobek, D. K. (2003), “Iteration in engineering design: inherent and unavoidable or product of choices made?” In: ASME 2003 International design engineering technical conferences and Computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2003/DTM-48662Google Scholar
Datta, S. (2018), “How does developer interaction relate to software quality? an examination of product development data”, Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 1153–1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9534-0Google Scholar
Dayan, M. and Di Benedetto, C. A. (2011), “Team intuition as a continuum construct and new product creativity: The role of environmental turbulence, team experience, and stress. In: Research Policy Vol. 40 No. 2, S. pp. 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.002Google Scholar
Dörner, D. (1979), Problemlösen als Informationsverarbeitung, Kohlhammer-Standards Psychologie Studientext, Vol. 2. Aufl., Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Dörner, D. (2000), Die Logik des Mißlingens: Strategisches Denken in komplexen Situationen, Rororo Rororo-Sachbuch Rororo science, Vol. 19314 No. 13. Aufl., Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg.Google Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K. and Meerkamm, H. (2013), Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenarbeit, 5th ed., München: Carl Hanser Verlag, http://doi.org/10.3139/9783446436275.Google Scholar
Gericke, K., Meißner, M. and Paetzold, K. (2013), “Understanding the context of product development”, DS 75-3: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13) Design For Harmonies, Vol. 75 No. 3.Google Scholar
Glock, F. (1998), Konstruieren als sozialer Prozeß: Eine Untersuchung technischen Gestaltens, Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-99953-5Google Scholar
Greiff, S. and Funke, J. (2010), “Systematische Erforschung komplexer Problemlösefähigkeit anhand minimal komplexer Systeme”. Projekt Dynamisches Problemlösen. In: Für Pädagog, Z. No. 56, S. pp. 216–227.Google Scholar
Hales, C. and Gooch, S. (2004), Managing Engineering Design. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-394-7Google Scholar
Ismail, M. (2005), “Creative climate and learning organization factors: their contribution towards innovation”. In: Leadership & Org Development J Vol. 26 No. 8, S. pp. 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510633719.Google Scholar
Khan, K.S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J. and Antes, G. (2003), “Five steps to conducting a systematic review”, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol. 96 No. 3, pp. 118–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680309600304Google Scholar
Koc, T. (2007), “Organizational determinants of innovation capacity in software companies”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 53 No. 3, pp. 373–385, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.05.003.Google Scholar
Lettl, C. (2007), “User involvement competence for radical innovation”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 24 No. 1–2, pp. 53–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.004.Google Scholar
Maffin, D., Thwaites, A., Alderman, N., Braiden, P. and Hills, B. (1997), “Managing the product development process: combining best practice with company and project contexts”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329708524269Google Scholar
McCoy, A.P., Thabet, W. and Badinelli, R. (2009), “Understanding the role of developer/builders in the concurrent commercialization of product innovation”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 102–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060910928193Google Scholar
Morton, S.C., Brookes, N.J., Dainty, A.R.J., Backhouse, C.J. and Burns, N.D. (2006), “The Role of Social Relationships in Improving Product Development Decision Making”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 220 No. 6, pp. 1017–1024, https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM451SC.Google Scholar
Noll, J., Razzak, M.A. and Beecham, S. (2017), “Motivation and Autonomy in Global Software Development”, in Mendes, E., Counsell, S. and Petersen, K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering - EASE'17, Karlskrona, Sweden, ACM Press, New York, USA, pp. 394–399. https://doi.org/10.1145/3084226.3084277Google Scholar
Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. (2013), Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung.Google Scholar
Redtenbacher, F. (1852), Prinzipien der Mechanik und des Maschinenbaues. Bassermann Verlag, Mannheim.Google Scholar
Redtenbacher, F. J., von Krosigk, E. (2007), Prinzipien der Mechanik und des Maschinenbaus. Vol. 1. VDM, Müller, Aufl. Saarbrücken, (Edition classic).Google Scholar
Restuccia, M., Brentani, U., Legoux, R. and Ouellet, J.-F. (2016), “Product Life-Cycle Management and Distributor Contribution to New Product Development”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 69–89, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12261.Google Scholar
Ropohl, G. (1975), Einführung in die Systemtechnik.: Systemtechnik—Grundlagen und Anwendungen, Carl Hanser Verlag, München.Google Scholar
Ruckpaul, A., Kriltz, A. and Matthiesen, S. (2014), “Using eye tracking to understand the engineering designers’ behavior in synthesis-driven analyzing processes: experiences in study design”, International conference on human behavior in design HBiD.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T.S., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2017), “Agile Development of Physical Products. An Empirical Study about Motivations, Potentials and Applicability”, University of the German Federal Armed Forces.Google Scholar
Snowden, D.J. and Boone, M.E. (2007), “A Leader's Framework for Decision Making”, Harvard business review, Vol. 85 No. 11, pp. 68–77.Google Scholar
Sundström, P. and Zika-Viktorsson, A. (2009), “Organizing for innovation in a product development project”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 27 No. 8, pp. 745–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.02.007Google Scholar
Terho, H., Suonsyrjä, S. and Systä, K. (2016), “The Developers Dilemma: Perfect Product Development or Fast Business Validation?” in Abrahamsson, P., Jedlitschka, A., Nguyen Duc, A., Felderer, M., Amasaki, S. and Mikkonen, T. (Eds.), Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10027, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 571–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_42Google Scholar
Thomke, S. and Reinertsen, D. (1998), “Agile Product Development: Managing Development Flexibility in Uncertain Environments”, California Management Review, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 8–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165973Google Scholar
Todt, G., Weiss, M. and Hoegl, M. (2018), “Mitigating Negative Side Effects of Innovation Project Terminations: The Role of Resilience and Social Support”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 518–542, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12426.Google Scholar
Verner, J.M., Babar, M.A., Cerpa, N., Hall, T. and Beecham, S. (2014), “Factors that motivate software engineering teams: A four country empirical study”, Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 92, pp. 115–127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.01.008.Google Scholar
Weiss, M., Hoegl, M. and Gibbert, M. (2011), “Making Virtue of Necessity: The Role of Team Climate for Innovation in Resource-Constrained Innovation Projects”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 28 No. s1, pp. 196–207, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00870.x.Google Scholar
Wild, E. and Möller, J. (2015), Pädagogische Psychologie, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Wynn, D.C. and Clarkson, P.J. (2018), “Process models in design and development”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 161–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-017-0262-7Google Scholar
Wynn, D. C.; Eckert, C. M.; Clarkson, P. J. (2007): “Modelling Iteration in Engineering Design. In: 16th International Conference on Engineering Design ICED'07.Google Scholar
Zika-Viktorsson, A. and Ingelgård, A. (2006), “Reflecting activities in product developing teams: conditions for improved project management processes”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-006-0019-1Google Scholar