Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T06:21:19.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intra-Firm and Inter-Firm Challenges in Servitization Ecosystem: Experiences from Five Product-Centric Firms in Different Industries

Part of: Product-Service-System (PSS) Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Koteshwar Chirumalla ,
Oyetola Emmanuel-Ebikake ,
Luna Leoni  and
Mohsen Servati
Koteshwar Chirumalla*
Affiliation:
Mälardalen University;
Oyetola Emmanuel-Ebikake
Affiliation:
Edge Hill University;
Luna Leoni
Affiliation:
Tor Vergata University of Rome;
Mohsen Servati
Affiliation:
Jönköping University
*
Contact: Chirumalla, Koteshwar Mälardalen University, Innovation and Product Realisation Sweden [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purpose of this paper is to analyse the challenges in the servitization journey of product-centric firms from an ecosystem perspective, considering both intra-firm and inter-firm levels. Prior research addresses the challenges of servitization in many sectors from different perspectives. However, the majority of studies primarily focus on the provider of an offering. There is a lack of in-depth studies on analysing servitization challenges from the broader set of network actors including customers, suppliers, and sub-suppliers at the intra-firm and inter-firm levels. A multiple case study method was used to analyse five product-centric firms from different industries that were engaged in servitization. At intra- firm level, our analysis shows that ‘coordination’ is a major challenge for the provider, supplier, and sub-suppliers, and that ‘uncertainty’ and ‘risk’ is a major challenge for the provider, customer, and supplier. At inter-firm level, ‘partnership management’ found to be a most significant challenge for provider, customer, supplier, and sub-suppliers. The study contributes to the discussion of the relational view approach for servitization research.

Keywords

Product-Service Systems (PSS)Circular economyBusiness models and considerations
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 3071 - 3080
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Ayala, N.F. et al. (2017), “Knowledge sharing dynamics in service suppliers’ involvement for servitization of manufacturing companies”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 193, pp. 538–553.Google Scholar
Aarikka-Stenroos, L. and Jaakkola, E. (2012), “Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: a dyadic perspective on the joint problem-solving process”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
Alghisi, A. and Saccani, N. (2015), “Internal and external alignment in the servitization journey – overcoming the challenges”, Production Planning & Control, Vol. 26 No. 14–15, pp. 1219–1232.Google Scholar
Baines, T., et al. (2017), “Servitization: revisiting the state-of-the-art and research priorities”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 256–278.Google Scholar
Burton, J. et al. (2016), “Identifying Tensions in the Servitized Value Chain”, RTM, Vol. 59 No. 5, pp. 38–47.Google Scholar
Basole, R.C. and Rouse, W.B. (2008), “Complexity of service value networks: Conceptualization and empirical investigation”, IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 53–70.Google Scholar
Braun, and Clarke, (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3 pp. 77–101.Google Scholar
Cenamor, J., et al. (2017), “Adopting a platform approach in servitization: Leveraging the value of digitalization”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 192, pp. 54–65.Google Scholar
Chirumalla, K. (2013), “Managing knowledge for product-service systems innovation: The role of Web 2.0 technologies”, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 56 No. 2, pp. 45–53.Google Scholar
Chirumalla, K. (2016), “Organizing lessons learned practice for product-service innovation”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69, pp. 4986–4991.Google Scholar
Dachs, B., et al. (2013), “Servitisation of European manufacturing: evidence from a large scale database”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 5–23.Google Scholar
Eloranta, V. and Turunen, T. T. (2015), “Seeking competitive advantage with service infusion: a systematic literature review”, Journal of Service Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 394–425.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. and Graebner, M. E. (2007), “Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 25–32.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. and Mena, C. (2008), “Supply chain management for servitised products: a multi-industry case study”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 114 No. 1, pp. 27–39Google Scholar
Kinnunen, R. and Turunen, T. (2012), “Identifying Servitization Capabilities of Manufacturers: A Conceptual Model”, Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 55–78.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, H., et al. (2013), “The servitization of manufacturing: A systematic literature review of interdependent trends”, IJOPM, Vol. 33 No. 11/12, pp. 1408–1434.Google Scholar
Lüftenegger, , et al. (2013), “The Service-Dominant Ecosystem: Mapping a Service Dominant Strategy to a Product-Service Ecosystem”, In: IFIP AICT Vol. 408, pp. 22–30.Google Scholar
Luoto, S., et al. (2016), “Critical meta-analysis of servitization research: Constructing a model-narrative to reveal paradigmatic assumptions”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 60, pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, H. and Baines, T. (2013), “Made to serve”, Made to Serve: How Manufacturers Can Compete Through Servitization and Product Service Systems. Wiley.Google Scholar
Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994), “Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook”. Sage.Google Scholar
Martinez, V. et al. (2010), “Challenges in transforming manufacturing organisations into product-service providers”. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 449–469.Google Scholar
Matschewsky, J. et al. (2017), “Designing and providing integrated product-service systems–challenges, opportunities and solutions resulting from prescriptive approaches in two industrial companies”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 56 No. 6, pp. 2150–2168.Google Scholar
Neely, A. (2009), “Exploring the financial consequences of the servitization of manufacturing”, Operations Management Research, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 103–118.Google Scholar
Oliva, R. and Kallenberg, R. (2003), “Managing the transition from products to services”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 160–172.Google Scholar
Parida, V. et al. (2015), “Developing global service innovation capabilities: How global manufacturers address the challenges of market heterogeneity”, Research Technology Management, Vol. 58 No. 5, pp. 35–44.Google Scholar
Patton, M.Q. (2002), Qualitative research, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Rabetino, , et al. (2015), “Developing the concept of life-cycle service offering”, IMM, Vol. 49, pp. 53–66.Google Scholar
Raddats, C. et al. (2017), “Interactively developed capabilities: evidence from dyadic servitization relationships”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 382–400.Google Scholar
Sjodin, D., et al. (2017), “Barriers and conditions of open operation: a customer perspective on value co-creation for integrated product-service solutions”, International Journal of Technology Marketing, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 90–111.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. andCorbin, J.M. (1990), Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USGoogle Scholar
Windahl, C. and Lakemond, N. (2006), “Developing integrated solutions: the importance of relationships within the network”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 35 No. 7, pp. 806–818.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2008), Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. and Banerji, S. (2017), “Challenges of servitization: A systematic literature review”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 65, pp. 217–227.Google Scholar