Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T05:46:54.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How to Design for Joy / Satisfaction - Two Different Approaches on How to Tackle the Task

Part of: User-Centred Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Alexander Atzberger ,
Eleonora Boffa ,
Joaquin Montero ,
Kristin Paetzold  and
Sandor Vajna
Alexander Atzberger*
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich;
Eleonora Boffa
Affiliation:
KTH Royal Institute of Technology;
Joaquin Montero
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich;
Kristin Paetzold
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich;
Sandor Vajna
Affiliation:
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
*
Contact: Atzberger, Alexander, Bundeswehr University Munich, Institute for Technical Product Development, Germany, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the course of the IPD International Summer School, two teams addressed the topic of devel-oping an integrated product, with the constraint of it being joyful for the user. One team has chosen an agile development approach whereas the second team approached it in a plan-driven manner. With the starting conditions for both teams being equal, a direct comparison between the agile and plan-driven development approach can be undertaken. The different courses of action are displayed and the different ways on how to approach the topic of achieving joy for the user are outlined. The results as well as the challenges associated with each approach are dis-cussed and an outlook on the transferability to other fields is given.

Keywords

Multi- / Cross- / Trans-disciplinary processesCollaborative designCase study
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 3919 - 3928
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Bloch, P.H. (1995), “Seeting the ideal form: Product design and consumer response”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59 No. 3, pp. 16–29.Google Scholar
Bloch, P.H. (2011), “Product design and marketing: Reflections after fifteen years”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 378–380.Google Scholar
Böhmer, A., Beckmann, A. and Lindemann, U. (2015), “Open Innovation Ecosystem - Makerspaces within an Agile Innovation Process”, In: Huizingh, E., Conn, S. and Bitran, I. (Ed.), Proceedings of the ISPIM Innovation Summit: Changing the Innovation Landscape, The International Society for Innovation Management, Brisbane, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Conforto, E., Salum, F., Amaral, D., da Silva, S.L. and deAlmeida, L.F.M. (2014), “Can Agile Project Managemet Be Adopted by Industries Other than Software Development?”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 21–34.Google Scholar
Davenport, T., Dalle Mule, L. and Lucker, J. (2011), “Know what your customers want before they do”, Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
Demirbilek, O. and Sener, B. (2003), “Product design, semantics and emotional response”, Ergonomics, Vol. 46 No. 13–14, pp. 1346–1360.Google Scholar
Desmet, P.M.A. (2012), “Faces of product pleasure: 25 positive emotions in human-product interactions”, International Journal of Design, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Desmet, P.M.A. and Hekkert, P. (2009), “Special issue editorial: Design & Emotion”, International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 55 No. 6.Google Scholar
Fenko, A. and van Rompay, T.J.L. (2018), Consumer-Driven Product Design, Methods in Consumer Research, Volume 2: Alternative Approaches and Special Applications, Vol. 2, Elsevier Ltd, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101743-2.00018-2.Google Scholar
Halonen, E., Pynttäri, V., Lilja, J., Sillanpää, H., Mäntysalo, M., Heikkinen, J., Mäkinen, R., et al. (2011), “Environmental protection of inkjet-printed Ag conductors”, Microelectronic Engineering, Vol. 88 No. 9, pp. 2970–2976.Google Scholar
Hekkert, P. and Desmet, P.M.A. (2002), “The Basis of Product Emotions”, Pleasure with Products: Beyond Usability, pp. 60–68.Google Scholar
Kiran, D.R. (2017), “Customer Satisfaction, Total Quality Management”, Elsevier, pp. 125–141.Google Scholar
Nerur, S. and Balijepally, V. (2007), “Theoretical reflections on agile development methodologies”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 50 No. 3, pp. 79–83.Google Scholar
Oestereich, B. and Weiss, C. (2008), APM - Agiles Projektmanagement, dpunkt Verlag.Google Scholar
Sauerwein, E., Bailom, F., Matzler, K. and Hinterhuber, H.H. (1996), “The Kano Model: How to Delight Your Customers”, International Working Seminar on Production Economics, pp. 313–327.Google Scholar
Stacey, R. (2002), “Organizations as complex responsive processes of relating”, Journal of Innovative Management, Vol. 8 No. 2.Google Scholar