Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:58:39.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ecological Advanced Innovation Design Approach for Efficient Integrated Upstream and Downstream Processes

Part of: Responsible Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Pavel Livotov ,
Mas'udah Mas'udah ,
Arun Prasad Chandra Sekaran ,
Richard Law  and
David Reay
Pavel Livotov*
Affiliation:
Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany;
Mas'udah Mas'udah
Affiliation:
Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany;
Arun Prasad Chandra Sekaran
Affiliation:
Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany;
Richard Law
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, United Kingdom;
David Reay
Affiliation:
David Reay & Associates, United Kingdom
*
Contact: Livotov, Pavel, Offenburg University of Applied Sciences Mechanical and Process Engineering Germany, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Process engineering industries are now facing growing economic pressure and societies' demands to improve their production technologies and equipment, making them more efficient and environmentally friendly. However unexpected additional technical and ecological drawbacks may appear as negative side effects of the new environmentally-friendly technologies. Thus, in their efforts to intensify upstream and downstream processes, industrial companies require a systematic aid to avoid compromising of ecological impact. The paper conceptualises a comprehensive approach for eco-innovation and eco- design in process engineering. The approach combines the advantages of Process Intensification as Knowledge-Based Engineering (KBE), inventive tools of Knowledge-Based Innovation (KBI), and main principles and best-practices of Eco-Design and Sustainable Manufacturing. It includes a correlation matrix for identification of eco-engineering contradictions and a process mapping technique for problem definition, database of Process Intensification methods and equipment, as well as a set of strongest inventive operators for eco-ideation.

Keywords

EcodesignDesign processKnowledge-based innovationProcess intensificationIntegrated product development
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 3291 - 3300
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Altshuller, G.S. (1984), Creativity as an exact science: the theory of the solution of inventive problems, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, ISSN 0275-5807.Google Scholar
Azzaro-Pantel, C. (2015), “Green Process Engineering Design Methodology: A Multicriteria Approach,” In: Poux, M., Cognet, P., Gourdon, C. (Eds.), Green Process Engineering: From Concepts to Industrial Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 3–26, ISBN 9781482208177.Google Scholar
Benali, M. and Kudra, T. (2008), “Drying process intensification: application to food processing”. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266211018. Accessed on 11.11.2018.Google Scholar
de Bont, C., den Ouden, P.H., Schifferstein, H.N.J., Smulders, F.E.H.M. and van der Voort, M. (2013), Advanced design methods for successful innovation, Design United, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Boodhoo, K. and Harvey, A. (2013), “Process Intensification: An overview of principles and practice,” In: Boodhoo, K. and Harvey, A. (Eds.), Process Intensification for Green Chemistry, John Wiley & sons, pp. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118498521.ch1Google Scholar
Calza, F., Parmentola, and , A., Tutore, I. (2017), “Types of Green Innovations: Ways of Implementation in a Non-Green Industry”, Sustainability, Vol. 9 No. 8 p. 1301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081301Google Scholar
Casner, D. and Livotov, P. (2017), “Advanced innovation design approach for process engineering”, 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17), Vol 4: Design Methods and Tools, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25.08.2017, pp. 653–662, ISBN 978-1-904670-92-6.Google Scholar
Cavalluci, D., Cascini, G., Duflou, J., Livotov, P. and Vaneker, T. (2015), “TRIZ and Knowledge-Based Innovation in Science and Industry”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 131, pp. 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.341Google Scholar
Chen, J.L. (2002), “Green evolution rules and ideality laws for green innovative design of products,” Fourth international symposium on going green-care innovation, Vienna, pp. 130–134.Google Scholar
Cluzel, F., Vallet, F., Tyl, B., Bertoluci, G. and Leroy, Y. (2014), “Eco-design vs. eco-innovation: an industrial survey,” 13th Int. Design Conference - DESIGN 2014, Dubrovnik, pp. 1501–1510.Google Scholar
Cross, W.T. and Ramshaw, C. (1986), “Process intensification: laminar flow heat transfer”, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Vol. 64, pp. 293–301.Google Scholar
European Commission (2018), “Efficient integrated downstream processes,” Research and Innovation, Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/ce-spire-04-2019.html (29.11.2018).Google Scholar
Ferrer, J.B., Negny, S., Robles, G.C. and Le Lann, J.M. (2012), “Eco-innovative Design Method for Process Engineering”, Computers & Chemical Engineering, Vol. 45, pp. 137–151.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, D.P., Herrmann, J.W., Sandborn, P.A., Schmidt, L.C., Gogoll, T.H. (2007), “Design for Environment (DfE): Strategies, Practices, Guidelines, Methods, and Tools,” In: Kutz, M. (Ed.), Environmentally Conscious Mechanical Design, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Fresner, J., Jantschgi, J., Birkel, S., Barnthaler, J. and Krenn, C. (2010), “The theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ) as option generation tool within cleaner production projects”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 128–136.Google Scholar
Fussler, C. and James, P. (1996), Driving eco-innovation: a breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability, London Pitman Publishing, Washington DC.Google Scholar
GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB. (2016), “Unlocking the potential for efficiency in downstream bioprocesses”, Available at: http://www.processdevelopmentforum.com/ppts/posters/WP29195721_Process_intensification.pdf (12.11.2018).Google Scholar
Keil, F.J. (2018), “Process intensification,” Reviews in Chemical Engineering, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 135–200. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2017-0085Google Scholar
Law, R., Ramshaw, C. and Reay, D. (2017), “Process intensification – overcoming impediments to heat and mass transfer enhancement when solids are present, via the IbD project”, Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, pp. 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2017.02.004Google Scholar
Lindahl, M. and Ekermann, S. (2013), “Structure for Categorization of EcoDesign Methods and Tools,” In: Andrew, Y.C. , Y.C. Nee, Bin Song, Soh-Khim Ong, (Eds.), Re-engineering Manufacturing for Sustainability: Proceedings of the 20th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Springer Science & Business Media, Singapore, 17-19 April, 2013, pp. 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-48-2_19Google Scholar
Livotov, P., Mas'udah, and Chandra Sekaran, A.P. (2018), “On the Efficiency of TRIZ Application for Process Intensification in Process Engineering”, In: Cavallucci, D., de Guio, R., Koziołek, S. (Eds.), Automated Invention for Smart Industries, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Vol. 541, Springer, Cham, pp. 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02456-7_11Google Scholar
Livotov, P., Chandra Sekaran, A.P., Law, R., Mas'udah, and Reay, D. (2019a), “Systematic Innovation in Process Engineering: Linking TRIZ and Process Intensification.” In: Chechurin, L., Collan, M. (Eds.), Advances in Systematic Creativity, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78075-7_3Google Scholar
Livotov, P., Mas'udah Sarsenova, A. and Chandra Sekaran, A.P. (2019b), “Identification of Secondary Problems of New Technologies in Process Engineering by Patent Analysis,” In: Chechurin, L., Collan, M. (Eds.), Advances in Systematic Creativity, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78075-7_10Google Scholar
Livotov, P., Chandra Sekaran, A.P., Mas'udah Law, R., Reay, D., Sarsenova, A. and Sayyareh, S. (2019c), “Eco-innovation in Process Engineering: Contradictions, Inventive Principles and Methods”, Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, Vol. 9 No. 2019, pp. 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2018.10.012Google Scholar
Moldavska, A. and Welo, T. (2017), “The concept of sustainable manufacturing and its definitions: A content-analysis based literature review”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 166, pp. 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.006Google Scholar
Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. (1996), Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3581-4Google Scholar
Patrasacu, I., Bildea, C.S. and Kiss, A.A. (2018), “Eco-efficient downstream processing of bio-butanol by enhanced process intensification and integration”, ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 5452–5461. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00320Google Scholar
Poux, M., Cognet, P. and Gourdon, C. (2015), Green Process Engineering: From Concepts to Industrial Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, ISBN 9781482208177.Google Scholar
Reay, D., Ramshaw, C. and Harvey, A. (2013), Process Intensification, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.Google Scholar
Roberts, S.J.F. and Ball, P.D. (2014), “Developing a library of sustainable manufacturing practices”, 21st CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 15, pp. 159–164.Google Scholar
Russo, D., Schofer, M. and Bersano, G. (2015), “Supporting ECO-innovation in SMEs by TRIZ Eco-guidelines”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 131, pp. 831–839.Google Scholar
Russo, D. and Serafini, M. (2015), “Anticipating the identification of contradictions in eco-design problems”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 131, pp. 1011–1020.Google Scholar
Tyl, B., Legardeur, J., Millet, D. and Vallet, F. (2014), “A comparative study of ideation mechanisms used in eco-innovation tools”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 25 No. 10–12, pp. 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2014.992772Google Scholar
VDI (2016), VDI Standard 4521. Inventive problem solving with TRIZ. Fundamentals, terms and definitions, Beuth, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Mustaffar, A., Phan, A.N., Zivkovic, V., Reay, D., Law, R. and Boodhoo, K. (2017), “A review of process intensification applied to solids handling”, Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, Vol. 118, pp. 78–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2017.04.007Google Scholar