Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:02:55.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design of Shoe Soles Using Lattice Structures Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing

Part of: Design for Additive Manufacturing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Guoying Dong ,
Daniel Tessier  and
Yaoyao Fiona Zhao

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Additive manufacturing (AM) has enabled great application potential in several major industries. The footwear industry can customize shoe soles fabricated by AM. In this paper, lattice structures are discussed. They are used to design functional shoe soles that can have controllable stiffness. Different topologies such as Diamond, Grid, X shape, and Vintiles are used to generate conformal lattice structures that can fit the curved surface of the shoe sole. Finite element analysis is conducted to investigate stress distribution in different designs. The fused deposition modeling process is used to fabricate the designed shoe soles. Finally, compression tests compare the stiffness of shoe soles with different lattice topologies. It is found that the plantar stress is highly influenced by the lattice topology. From preliminary calculations, it has been found that the shoe sole designed with the Diamond topology can reduce the maximum stress on the foot. The Vintiles lattice structure and the X shape lattice structure are stiffer than the Diamond lattice. The Grid lattice structure buckles in the experiment and is not suitable for the design.

Keywords

Additive ManufacturingSimulationDesign methodsLattice structureShoe sole
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 719 - 728
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Bingheng Lu, D. L. and Xiaoyong, Tian (2015), “Development Trends in Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing”. Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 85–89.Google Scholar
Birtchnell, T. and Urry, J. (2013), “3D, SF and the future”. Futures, Vol. 50, pp. 25–34.Google Scholar
Brennan-craddock, J., Brackett, D., Wildman, R. and Hague, R. (2012), “The design of impact absorbing structures for additive manufacture”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, p. 012042.Google Scholar
Carbon. (2018), Available: https://www.carbon3d.com/stories/carbon-lattice-innovation-the-adidas-story.Google Scholar
Cheung, J.T.M. and Zhang, M. (2006, May) “Finite element modeling of the human foot and footwear”. In ABAQUS users’ conference (pp. 145–158).Google Scholar
Choi, S. and Cheung, H. (2008), “A versatile virtual prototyping system for rapid product development”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 59, pp. 477–488.Google Scholar
Davia-aracil, M., Hinojo-pérez, J. J., Jimeno-morenilla, A. and Mora-mora, H. (2018), “3D printing of functional anatomical insoles”. Computers in Industry, Vol. 95, pp. 38–53.Google Scholar
Dong, G., Tang, Y. and Zhao, Y. F. (2017), “A Survey of Modeling of Lattice Structures Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing”. Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol 139, pp. 100906–100906-13.Google Scholar
Dong, G., Tang, Y. and Zhao, Y. F. (2018), “A 149 Line Homogenization Code for Three-Dimensional Cellular Materials Written in matlab”, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Vol. 141, pp. 011005–011005-11.Google Scholar
Ko, H., Moon, S. K. and Hwang, J. (2015), “Design for additive manufacturing in customized products”. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, Vol. 16, pp. 2369–2375.Google Scholar
Maskery, I., Aboulkhair, N. T., Aremu, A. O., Tuck, C. J. and Ashcroft, I. A. (2017), “Compressive failure modes and energy absorption in additively manufactured double gyroid lattices”. Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 16, pp. 24–29.Google Scholar
Paoletti, I. (2017), “Mass customization with additive manufacturing: new perspectives for multi performative building components in architecture”. A sustainable Built Environment Conference 2016 Series (SBE16), iHBE 2016, pp. 1150–1159.Google Scholar
Schaedler, T. A. and Carter, W. B. (2016), “Architected Cellular Materials”, Annual Review of Materials Research.Google Scholar
Tancogne-dejean, T., Spierings, A. B. and Mohr, D. (2016), “Additively-manufactured metallic micro-lattice materials for high specific energy absorption under static and dynamic loading”, Acta Materialia, Vol. 116, pp. 14–28.Google Scholar
Tang, Y., Kurtz, A. and Zhao, Y. F. (2015), “Bidirectional Evolutionary Structural Optimization (BESO) based design method for lattice structure to be fabricated by additive manufacturing”. CAD Computer Aided Design, Vol. 69, pp. 91–101.Google Scholar
Ultimaker, . (2018), TPU 95A. Available: https://ultimaker.com/en/products/materials/tpu-95a.Google Scholar
Wang, H. and Rosen, D. W. (2002), “Parametric Modeling Method for Truss Structures”. pp. 759–767.Google Scholar
Whiteley, M., White, D., Benzley, S. and Blacker, T. (1996), “Two and three-quarter dimensional meshing facilitators”. Engineering with Computers, Vol. 12, pp. 144–154.Google Scholar