Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:31:17.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Concept for Process-Oriented Interdisciplinary Tolerance Management Considering Production-Specific Deviations

Part of: Robust Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Bjoern Heling ,
Thomas Oberleiter ,
Andreas Rohrmoser ,
Christoph Kiener ,
Benjamin Schleich ,
Hinnerk Hagenah ,
Marion Merklein ,
Kai Willner  and
Sandro Wartzack

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To meet rising customer requirements, increasingly complex products have to be virtually validated. To achieve this within the framework of virtual product development, a wide range of aspects has to be taken into account. In this context, tolerance analysis has established itself as a proven tool to evaluate the consequences of geometric part deviations on geometric product characteristics. Existing approaches, however, do not sufficiently take into account production-specific deviations, leading to time-consuming iterations during the product development process. Therefore, the focus of this contribution is on process-oriented interdisciplinary tolerance management that allows the integration of manufacturing simulations into the tolerance analysis. In contrast to the conventional approach, this novel methodology allows to avoid unnecessary iterations in the context of product development and validation. Following the presentation of the novel procedure, the application on a case study of an X- ray shutter is carried out, whereby surrogate models are integrated in order to reduce the computing time.

Keywords

Robust designTolerance representation and managementDesign for X (DfX)
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 3441 - 3450
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Ameta, G., Singh, G., Davidson, J.K. and Shah, J.J. (2018), “Tolerance-Maps to Model Composite Positional Tolerancing for Patterns of Features”, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, Vol. 18 No. 3, p. 31003.Google Scholar
Bausch, T. (2009), Innovative Zahnradfertigung: Verfahren, Maschinen und Werkzeuge zur kostengünstigen Herstellung von Stirnrädern mit hoher Qualität, Kontakt & Studium, Vol. 175, Expert, Renningen.Google Scholar
Chinesta, F., Ammar, A., Leygue, A. and Keunings, R. (2011), “An overview of the proper generalized decomposition with applications in computational rheology”, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 166 No. 11, pp. 578–592.Google Scholar
Dantan, J.-Y., Anwer, N. and Mathieu, L. (2003), “Integrated Tolerancing Process for conceptual design”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 135–138.Google Scholar
Forrester, A.I.J., Sóbester, A. and Keane, A.J. (2008), Engineering design via surrogate modelling: A practical guide, 1st ed., Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Geis, A., Husung, S., Oberänder, A., Weber, C. and Adam, J. (2015), “Use of Vectorial Tolerances for Direct Representation and Analysis in CAD-systems”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 27, pp. 230–240.Google Scholar
Giordano, M., Samper, S. and Petit, J.P. (2007), “Tolerance Analysis and Synthesis by Means of Deviation Domains, Axi-Symmetric Cases”, In: Davidson, J.K. (Ed.), Models for Computer Aided Tolerancing in Design and Manufacturing, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 85–94.Google Scholar
Goetz, S., Schleich, B. and Wartzack, S. (2018), “A new approach to first tolerance evaluations in the conceptual design stage based on tolerance graphs”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 75, pp. 167–172.Google Scholar
Heling, B., Aschenbrenner, A., Walter, M. and Wartzack, S. (2016), “On Connected Tolerances in Statistical Tolerance-Cost-Optimization of Assemblies with Interrelated Dimension Chains”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 43, pp. 262–267.Google Scholar
Heling, B., Hallmann, M. and Wartzack, S. (2017), “Hybrid Tolerance Representation of Systems in Motion”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 60, pp. 50–55.Google Scholar
ISO 1328-1 (2013), Cylindrical gears — ISO system of flank tolerance classification — Part 1: Definitions and allowable values of deviations relevant to flanks of gear teeth No. 1328-1:2013.Google Scholar
ISO 8015 (2011), Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Fundamentals — Concepts, principles and rules No. ISO 8015.Google Scholar
Klocke, F., Gorgels, C., Kauffmann, P., Herzhoff, S., Schalster, R., Stuckenberg, A. and Vasiliou, V. “Trends in der Zahnradfertigung”, In: Neugebauer, R., (Hrsg.), Tagungsband zum 5. Chemnitzer Produktionstechnischen Kolloquium CPK: Zerspanung in Grenzbereichen, Berichte aus dem IWU, Band 46 2008, pp. 87–113.Google Scholar
Krige, D.G. (1951), “A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand”, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Vol. 52 No. 6, pp. 119–139.Google Scholar
Lange, K. (2011), Handbook of metal forming, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, Mich.Google Scholar
Lorenz, R., Hagenah, H. and Merklein, M. (2018), “Experimental Evaluation of Cold Forging Lubricants Using Double-Cup-Extrusion-Tests”, Resource Efficient Material and Forming Technologies, Trans Tech Publications, pp. 65–70.Google Scholar
Mathieu, L. and Marguet, B. (2001), “Integrated Design Method to Improve Producibility based on Product Key Characteristics and Assembly Sequences”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 85–88.Google Scholar
Mohedas, I., Sabet Sarvestani, A., Daly, S.R. and Sienko, K.H. (2015), Applying design ethnography to product evaluation: A case example of a medical device in a low-resource setting, Vol. 2015.Google Scholar
Roy, U., Pramanik, N., Sudarsan, R., Sriram, R.D. and Lyons, K.W. (2001), “Function-to-form mapping. Model, representation and applications in design synthesis”, Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 33 No. 10, pp. 699–719.Google Scholar
Sacks, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, T.J. and Wynn, H.P. (1989), “Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments”, Statistical Science, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 409–423.Google Scholar
Schleich, B. and Wartzack, S. (2015), “A generic approach to sensitivity analysis in geometric variations management”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, pp. 343–352.Google Scholar
Schleich, B. and Wartzack, S. (2014a), “A discrete geometry approach for tolerance analysis of mechanism”, Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 77, pp. 148–163.Google Scholar
Schleich, B. and Wartzack, S. (2014b), “How can Computer Aided Tolerancing Support Closed Loop Tolerance Engineering?”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 21, pp. 312–317.Google Scholar
Schleich, B. and Wartzack, S. (2016), “A Quantitative Comparison of Tolerance Analysis Approaches for Rigid Mechanical Assemblies”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 43, pp. 172–177.Google Scholar
Stockinger, A. and Meerkamm, H. (2009), “Concept for the Integration of Manufacturing Simulations into Tolerance Analysis”, 2009.Google Scholar
Stuppy, J. (2011), Methodische und rechnerunterstützte Toleranzanalyse für bewegte technische Systeme, Fortschritt-berichte VDI. Reihe 20, Rechnerunterstütze Verfahren, Nr. 433, VDI, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Thornton, A.C. (1999), “A Mathematical Framework for the Key Characteristic Process”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 145–157.Google Scholar
Wärmefjord, K., Söderberg, R. and Lindkvist, L. (November 12–18, 2010), Strategies for Optimization of Spot Welding Sequence With Respect to Geometrical Variation in Sheet Metal Assemblies, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar