Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:10:00.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Computational Study of the Effect of Experience on Problem/Solution Space Exploration in Teams

Part of: Collaborative Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Marija Majda Perisic ,
Tomislav Martinec ,
Mario Storga  and
John S Gero
Marija Majda Perisic*
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb;
Tomislav Martinec
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb;
Mario Storga
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb; Luleå University of Technology;
John S Gero
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Charlotte; George Mason University
*
Contact: Perisic, Marija Majda, University of Zagreb, FSB, Department of Design Croatia, [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper presents the results of computational experiments aimed at studying the effect of experience on design teams’ exploration of problem-solution space. An agent-based model of a design team was developed and its capability to match theoretically-based predictions is tested. Hypotheses that (1) experienced teams need less time to find a solution and that (2) in comparison to the inexperienced teams, experienced teams spend more time exploring the solution-space than the problem-space, were tested. The results provided support for both of the hypotheses, demonstrating the impact of learning and experience on the exploration patterns in problem and solution space, and verifying the system's capability to produce the reliable results.

Keywords

TeamworkSimulationHuman behaviour in designAgent-based modellingCoevolution
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 11 - 20
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Ahmed, S., Wallace, K.M. and Blessing, L.T.M. (2003), “Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 1–11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00163-002-0023-zGoogle Scholar
Björklund, T.A. (2013), “Initial mental representations of design problems: Differences between experts and novices”, Design Studies, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 135–160. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.005Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2001), “Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity”, In: Newstatter, W. and McCracken, M. (Eds.), Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education, Elsevier, Oxford, UK. pp. 79–103.Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2004), “Expertise in design: an overview”, Design Studies, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 427–441. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002Google Scholar
Gero, J. S. (1990), “Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design”, AI Magazine, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 26–36.Google Scholar
Gero, J.S., Jiang, H. and Williams, C.B. (2013), “Design cognition differences when using unstructured, partially structured, and structured concept generation creativity techniques”, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 196–214. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2013.801760Google Scholar
Gero, J.S. and Kannengiesser, U. (2004), “The situated function-behavior-structure framework”, Design Studies, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 373–391. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2003.10.010Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011), Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.Google Scholar
Kavakli, M. and Gero, J. (2002), “The structure of concurrent cognitive actions: a case study on novice and expert designers”, Design Studies, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 25–40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00021-7Google Scholar
Liikkanen, L.A. and Perttula, M. (2009), “Exploring problem decomposition in conceptual design among novice designers”, Design Studies, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 38–59. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.07.003Google Scholar
Lloyd, P. and Scott, P. (1997), “Discovering the design problem”, Design Studies, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 125–140. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)90020-5Google Scholar
Maher, M.L. and Gero, J.S. (2002), “Agent models of 3D virtual worlds”, Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture, Pomona, California, October 24-27, 2002, Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture, Pomona, pp. 127–138.Google Scholar
McComb, C., Cagan, J. and Kotovsky, K. (2015), “Rolling with the punches: An examination of team performance in a design task subject to drastic changes”, Design Studies, Vol. 36, pp. 99–121. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2014.10.001Google Scholar
Milovanovic, J. and Gero, J.S. (2018), “Exploration of cognitive design behavior during design critiques”, Proceedings of the 15th International Design Conference (DESIGN 2018), Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 21-24, 2018, The Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 2099–2110. https://dx.doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0547Google Scholar
Perišić, M.M., Štorga, M. and Gero, J.S. (2017), “Building a computational laboratory for the study of team behaviour in product development”, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17), Vancouver, Canada, August 21-25, 2017, The Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 189–198.Google Scholar
Perišić, M.M., Štorga, M. and Gero, J.S. (2019), “Exploring the Effect of Experience on Team Behavior: A Computational Approach”, In: Gero, J.S. (Ed.), Design Computing and Cognition'18 (DCC'18), Springer, Cham, pp. 595–612. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05363-5_32Google Scholar
Petre, M. (2004), “How expert engineering teams use disciplines of innovation”, Design Studies, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 477–493. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.003Google Scholar
Sun, G., Yao, S. and Carretero, J.A. (2016), “An experimental approach to understanding design problem structuring strategies”, Journal of Design Research, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 94–117. https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2016.074778Google Scholar