Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:26:13.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysing and Solving the Reduced-Ability and Excessive-Use Dilemmas in Technology Use

Part of: Design Methods and Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Shigeru Wesugi

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Technology use provides great benefits by extending human ability, but the negative effects cannot always be ignored. The author examined the dilemmas of technology use based on Shibata's analysis of McLuhan's extension theory and indicated two types of dilemmas in continuous technology use. First is the decreased human ability as the innate functionality is substituted by the technology. Second is excessive utilisation of the technology, which may instil a false sense of naturally extended ability.

Subsequently, the author considered and suggested approaches for mitigating both types of dilemmas. The decreased-ability dilemma might be resolved by continuously utilising the technology and designing technology relevant to the degree of human ability. Meanwhile, the excessive-utilisation dilemma might be resolved by regulating the technology use and designing technology that achieves the desired disposition change in users.

Finally, the possibility of advancing the existing design approaches to further resolve the dilemmas was discussed.

Keywords

Design methodEarly design phasesEthicsTechnologyUser centred design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 1393 - 1402
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Birolini, A. (1999), Reliability Engineering Theory and Practice, Springer.Google Scholar
Calvo, R.A. and Peters, D. (2014), Positive Computing: Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chulha, https://www.chulha.org/Google Scholar
Esaka, N., Shinkawa, K. and Wesugi, S. (2015), “Assistance for Moving with Eccentric Contraction –Development of Braking Mechanism for Knee Flexion in Stance Phase on Descending a Mountain”, Proc. of the Human Interface Symposium 2015(HIS), pp. 427–430Google Scholar
Fogg, B.J. (2002), Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do, Interactive Technologies, Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Hollnagel, E. (2014), Safety–I and Safety-II: The Past and Future of Safety Management, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Hatano, Y., Kawano, A., Kobayashi, S., Fujita, T., Tomita, R. and Wesugi, S. (2018), “Supporting Method for Carrying Heavy Loads Focused on Construction Sites (Development of a Tool to Assist Holding and Lifting Down Long Objects with Braking Mechanism)”, Proc. of the Symp. on sports and human dynamics 2018(JSME), Vol. 2018, p. D-24Google Scholar
Ihde, D. (1990), Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jimenez, S., Pohlmeyer, A. and Desmet, P. (2015), Positive Design Reference Guide, blurb.Google Scholar
Koike, M., Omurao, T. and Wesugi, S. (2014), “Design of a Supporting Method for Finding Clues to Construct Unfamiliar Motions - Development of an Interface System Focusing on the Skeletal Structure and the Haptic Characteristics for the Scapula Motions”, Human Communication Group Symposium 2014, pp. 497–501Google Scholar
Plato, Phaedrus, http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/phaedrus.htmlGoogle Scholar
Shibata, T. (2013), McLuhan to media-ron -shintairon no syugou, keiso shoboGoogle Scholar
Shibata, T. (2015), “The “archetype” of cyborg: Understanding J. D. Bernal on genealogy of “extension””, Annual Bulletin of the New Humanities, Vol. 12, pp. 42–91.Google Scholar
Smith, C.E. (2007), Design For The Other 90%, Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum.Google Scholar
Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2009), Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness, Penguin.Google Scholar
Tsuchiya, K. (2001), Kangaekata wo kangaeru: souzousei wo hagukumu hinto, Ohmsha Ltd.Google Scholar
Verbeek, P.P.C.C. (2011), Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Verbeek, P.P.C.C. (2015), “Cover story: Beyond Interaction: a short introduction to mediation theory”, Interactions (ACM), Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 26–31. http://doi.org/10.1145/2751314.Google Scholar
Wesugi, S. (2013), “Design Approach of Simulation Exercise with Use of Device and Its Significance: Design of Novel Device for Realistic Experience of Being a Hemiplegia Patient”, Int. Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction, Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8017, pp. 315–324Google Scholar
Woods, D.D. and Hollnagel, E. (2006), Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Yubuki, S., Tokuyasu, Y., Iwata, S., Kawakami, Y. and Wesugi, S. (2018), “Improvement Method on Pedaling Skills of a Road Bike (Development of Training Equipment with Local Braking Applied to Pull-up Action)”, Proc. of the Symp. on sports and human dynamics 2018(JSME), Vol. 2018, p. B-23Google Scholar
Zhuang-zi, https://ctext.org/zhuangziGoogle Scholar