Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:31:55.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray probing of NGC 1275 nuclear region with Hitomi, Swift, and Suzaku

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2020

Yasushi Fukazawa*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan 739-8526 email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

NGC 1275 has been known as a ppint-like X-ray source with a continuum and a Fe-K line. Unlike radio and GeV/TeV gamma-ray emissions, origin of X-ray emission is not yet understood; is it a jet emission like blazars or an accretion corona emission like Seyfert galaxies. X-ray emission is important to determine the SED of jet emission to constrain jet parameters and also understand the relation between accretion and jet. Here we report a recent X-ray probing of NGC 1275 nuclear region with Hitomi/SXS, Swift/XRT, and Suzaku/XIS. Hitomi/SXS gave the first opportunity to measure a Fe-K line of AGNs with several eV resolution. The line center is consistent with the neutral iron emission, and the width is constrained to be 500-1600 km/s (FWHM). This ruled out the origin of broad line region and inner accretion disk. A low-covering-fraction molecular torus or a rotating molecular disk around pc scales, illuminated by accretion corona emission, is suggested as a possible origin. For the continuum emission, Suzaku/XIS monitor observations revealed that the X-ray flux has gradually increased as the GeV gamma-ray flux. Swift/XRT showed a several-days flux increase, associated with the GeV gamma-ray flare. These results on the continuum emission suggests a contribution of jet emission to the X-ray emission. Based on the combined results of Fe-K line and continuum, we discuss some scenarios for X-ray emitting region.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., & Ajello, M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churazov, E., Forman, W., Jones, C., & Böhringer, H. 2003, ApJ, 590, 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabian, A. C., Walker, S. A., Pinto, C., Russell, H. R., & Edge, A. C. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 3061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukazawa, Y., Hiragi, K., Mizuno, M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 727, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukazawa, Y., Finke, J., Stawarz, Ł., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, 74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukazawa, Y., Furui, S., Hayashi, K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukazawa, Y., Shiki, K., Tanaka, Y., et al. 2018, ApJ, 855, 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collaboration, Hitomi, Aharonian, F., Akamatsu, H., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagai, H., Chida, H., Kino, M., et al. 2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomé, P., Combes, F., Edge, A. C., et al. 2006, A&A, 454, 437Google Scholar
Scharwächter, J., McGregor, P. J., Dopita, M. A., & Beck, T. L. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2315 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, X. W., Yaqoob, T., & Wang, J. X. 2011, ApJ, 738, 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamazaki, S., Fukazawa, Y., Sasada, M., et al. 2013, PASJ, 65, 30CrossRefGoogle Scholar