Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:14:29.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Winds and magnetospheres from stars and planets: similarities and differences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2023

Stan Owocki*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, Bartol Research Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Both stars and planets can lose mass through an expansive wind outflow, often constrained or channeled by magnetic fields that form a surrounding magnetosphere. The very strong winds of massive stars are understood to be driven by line-scattering of the star’s radiative momentum, while in the Sun and even lower-mass stars a much weaker mass loss arises from the thermal expansion of a mechanically heated corona. In exoplanets around such low-mass stars, the radiative heating and wind interaction can lead to thermal expansion or mechanical ablation of their atmospheres. Stellar magnetospheres result from the internal trapping of the wind outflow, while planetary magnetospheres are typically shaped by the external impact from the star’s wind. But in both cases the stressing can drive magnetic reconnection that results in observable signatures such as X-ray flares and radio outbursts. This review will aim to give an overview of the underlying physics of these processes with emphasis on their similarities and distinctions for stars vs. planets.

Type
Contributed Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Castor, J. I., Abbott, D. C., & Klein, R. I. 1975, ApJ, 105, 157.10.1086/153315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenreich et al. 2015, Nature, 522, 459.10.1038/nature14501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayley, K. G. 1995, ApJ, 454, 410.10.1086/176492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecavelier Des Etangs. Ehrenreich, D. Vidal-Madjar, A., Ballester, G. E., Désert, J.-M., Ferlet, R., Hébrard, G., Sing, D. K., Tchakoumegni, K.-O. and Udry, S. 2010, A&A, 514, A72.Google Scholar
Leto, P., Trigilio, C., Krtička, J., Fossati, L., Ignace, R., Shultz, M. E., Buemi, C. S., et al., 2021, MNRAS, 507, 1979.10.1093/mnras/stab2168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owocki, S. P., Shultz, M. E., ud-Doula, A., Sundqvist, J. O., Townsend, R. H. D., Cranmer, S. R., 2020, MNRAS, 499, 5366.10.1093/mnras/staa2325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owocki, S. P., Shultz, M. E., ud-Doula, A., Chandra, P., Das, B., Leto, P., 2022, MNRAS, 513, 1449.10.1093/mnras/stac341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, V., Owocki, S. P., Wade, G. A., Cohen, D. H., Sundqvist, J. O., Gagné, M., Maz Apellániz, J., et al., 2013, MNRAS, 429, 398.10.1093/mnras/sts344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pneuman, G. W., Kopp, R. A., 1971, SoPh, 18, 258.Google Scholar
Shultz, M. E., Owocki, S., Rivinius, T., Wade, G. A., Neiner, C., Alecian, E., Kochukhov, O., et al., 2020, MNRAS, 499, 5379.10.1093/mnras/staa3102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shultz, M. E., Owocki, S. P., ud-Doula A., Biswas A., Bohlender D., Chandra P., Das B., et al., 2022, MNRAS, 513, 1429.10.1093/mnras/stac136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skumanich, A. 2019, ApJ, 878, 35.10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobolev, V. V. 1960, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Townsend, R. H. D., Owocki, S. P., 2005, MNRAS, 357, 251.10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08642.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, R. H. D., Owocki, S. P., Groote, D., 2005, ApJL, 630, L81.10.1086/462413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigilio, C., Leto, P., Umana, G., Leone, F., Buemi, C. S., 2004, A&A, 418, 593.Google Scholar
ud-Doula, A., Owocki, S. P., 2002, ApJ, 576, 413.10.1086/341543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ud-Doula, A., Owocki, S. P., Townsend, R. H. D., 2008, MNRAS, 385, 97.10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12840.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, E. J. and Davis, L. 1967, ApJ, 148, 217.10.1086/149138CrossRefGoogle Scholar