Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:30:54.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wind line variability and intrinsic errors in observational mass loss rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2024

Derck Massa*
Affiliation:
Space Science Institute, 4750 Walnut Street Suite 205 Boulder, Colorado 80301, USA
Raman Prinja*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

UV wind line variability in OB stars appears to be universal. We review the evidence that the variability is due to large, dense, optically thick structures rooted in or near the photosphere. Using repeated observations and a simple model we translate observed profile variations into optical depth variations and, consequently, variations in measured mass loss rates. Although global rates may be stable, measured rates vary. Consequently, profile variations infer how mass loss rates determined from UV wind lines vary. These variations quantify the intrinsic error inherent in any mass loss rate derived from a single observation. These derived rates can differ by factors of 3 or more. Our results also imply that rates from non-simultaneous observations (such as UV and ground based data) need not agree. Finally, we use our results to examine the nature of the structures responsible for the variability.

Type
Contributed Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Cranmer, S.R. & Owocki, S.P. 1996, Ap.J., 462, 469 Google Scholar
Ebbets, D. 1982, Ap.J. Supp., 48, 399 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, J.A., Henrichs, H.F., Kaper, L., et al 2001, A&A, 368, 601 Google Scholar
Fullerton, A.W., Massa, D.L., & Prinja, R.K. 2006, Ap.J., 637, 1025 Google Scholar
Lamers, H.J.G.L.M., Cerruti-Sola, M., & Perinotto, M. 1987, Ap.J., 314, 726Google Scholar
Lanz, T. & Hubeny, I. 2003, Ap.J. Supp., 146, 417 Google Scholar
Massa, D., Fullerton, A.W., Nichols, J.S., et al. 1995, Ap.J. Letters, 452, L53 Google Scholar
Massa, D., Fullerton, A.W., Hutchings, J.B., et al. 2000, ApJL, 538, L47 Google Scholar
Massa, D. & Prinja, R.K. 2015, ApJ, 809, 12 Google Scholar
Massa, D., Oskinova, L., Prinja, R. & Ignace, R. 2019, Ap.J., 873, 81 Google Scholar
Massa, D., Fullerton, A.W., Sonneborn, G., et al. 2003, Ap.J., 586, 996 Google Scholar
Nazé, Y., Oskinova, L.M., & Gosset, E. 2013, Ap.J., 763, 143 Google Scholar
Nazé, Y., Ramiaramanantsoa, T., Stevens, I.R., et al 2018, A&A, 609, A81 Google Scholar
Oskinova, L.M., Clarke, D., & Pollock, A.M.T. 2001, A&A, 378, L21 Google Scholar
Fullerton, A.W., Massa, D.L., Prinja, R.K., et al 1997, A&A, 327, 699 Google Scholar
Prinja, R.K. & Howarth, I.D. 1986, Ap.J. Supp., 61, 357 Google Scholar
Prinja, R.K., Massa, D.L., Urbaneja, M.A., et al 2012, M.N.R.A.S., 422, 3142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinja, R.K., Massa, D., & Fullerton, A.W. 2002, A&A, 388, 587 Google Scholar
Prinja, R.K. & Massa, D.L. 2010, A&A, 521, L55 Google Scholar