Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:32:24.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Where is the Light? Tracing the Evolution of Bulges and Disks since z ~ 0.8

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Lidia A. M. Tasca
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, CNRS-Université d'Aix-Marseille, 38 rue Frederic Joliot Curie, 13388 Marseille Cedex 13, France email: [email protected]
Laurence Tresse
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, CNRS-Université d'Aix-Marseille, 38 rue Frederic Joliot Curie, 13388 Marseille Cedex 13, France email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The chronology of galactic bulge and disk formation is studied by analysing the relative contributions of these components to the B band rest–frame luminosity density (LD) at two different cosmological epochs. The luminosity function (LF) of the bulge and disk components at z ~ 0.8 is computed on a galaxy subsample of the final zCOSMOS “bright” catalogue of roughly 20,000 objects with spectroscopic redshift in the COSMOS field. The comparison is then performed on galaxies in the local universe. Our preliminary results show that the LD in the disk component strongly decreases from ~ 80% at z ~ 0.8 to ~ 50% at z = 0, the bulges having a specular behaviour. The observational constraints provided in this work are aimed to discriminate among competing scenarios of galaxy formation and evolution. An appropriate comparison with hydrodynamical semianalytical models will be considered in a future study to understand further the formation and evolution of galaxies.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Benson, A. J., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 379, 841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolzonella, M., et al. 2010, A&A, 524, A76Google Scholar
Driver, S. P., et al. 2007, ApJ, 657, 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadotti, D. A. 2009, MNRAS, 393, 1531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C. Jr. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189Google Scholar
Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2007, ApJS, 172, 196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovač, K., et al. 2010, ApJ, 708, 505Google Scholar
Ilbert, O., et al. 2004, MNRAS 351, 541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilbert, O., et al. 2005, A&A, 439, 863Google Scholar
LeAAAAFèvre, O., Saisse, M., & Mancini, D., et al. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4841, 1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilly, S. J., LeAAAAFèvre, O., & Renzini, A., et al. 2007, ApJS, 172, 70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozzetti, L., et al. 2010, A&A, 523, 13Google Scholar
Peng, Y.-j., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechter, P. 1976, ApJ, 203, 297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechter, P. L. 1986, AJ, 94, 563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoville, N. Z., et al. 2007, ApJS, 172, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasca, L. A. M., & White, S. D. M. 2005, Multiwavelength Mapping of Galaxy Formation and Evolution, 465Google Scholar
Tasca, L. A. M., & White, S. D. M. 2005, arXiv:astro-ph/0507249v1Google Scholar
Tasca, L. A. M., et al. 2009, A&A, 503, 379Google Scholar
Tasca, L. A. M., et al. , submittedGoogle Scholar
Tasca, L. A. M. et al. , in preparationGoogle Scholar
Tresse, L., et al. , 2007, A&A, 472, 403Google Scholar
Tresse, L., Maddox, S. J., LeAAAAFèvre, O., & Cuby, J.-G. 2002, MNRAS, 337, 369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucca, E. et al. , 2009, A&A, 508, 1217Google Scholar