Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:26:09.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What do globular clusters tell us about isolated ellipticals? The case of NGC 6411

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

J. P. Caso
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata, and Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata (CCT La Plata – CONICET, UNLP), Paseo del Bosque S/N, B1900FWA La Plata, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Rivadavia 1917, C1033AAJ Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Lilia P. Bassino
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata, and Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata (CCT La Plata – CONICET, UNLP), Paseo del Bosque S/N, B1900FWA La Plata, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Rivadavia 1917, C1033AAJ Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
T. Richtler
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
R. Salinas
Affiliation:
Gemini Observatory, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We summarize the results from a study of the globular cluster (GC) system of the isolated elliptical galaxy NGC 6411, based on Gemini/GMOS g', r', i’ photometry. The extent of the globular cluster system is about 70 kpc. It contains ≍700 members. The colour distribution and luminosity function are typical of old GC systems. An excess of bright GCs with intermediate colours might evidence an intermediate-age merger.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Bassino, L. P. & Caso, J. P. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 4259Google Scholar
Bassino, L. P.et al. 2006, A&A, 451, 789Google Scholar
Bertin, E. & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393Google Scholar
Blakeslee, J. P., Lucey, J. R., Barris, B. J., Hudson, M. J., Tonry, J. L.et al. 2001, MNRAS, 327, 1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caso, J. P., PhD Thesis, 2015, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
Caso, J. P., Bassino, L. P., Gómez, M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 3227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caso, J. P., Bassino, L. P., Richtler, T., Salinas, R.et al. 2019a, MNRAS, 483, 4371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caso, J. P., De Bórtoli, B., Ennis, A. I., Bassino, L. P.et al. 2019b, MNRAS, submittedGoogle Scholar
Faifer, F. R.et al. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 155Google Scholar
Filippenko, A. V. 1999, IAU Circ, 7219Google Scholar
González Delgado, R. M.et al. 2015, A&A, 581, A103Google Scholar
Kruijssen, J. M. D. 2014, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 31, 244006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacerna, I.et al. 2016, A&A, 588, A79Google Scholar
Muratov, A. L. & Gnedin, O. Y. 2010, ApJ, 718, 1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, S.-M., Heinämäki, P., Nurmi, P., Saar, E.et al. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 477Google Scholar
Richtler, T. 2003, Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag, 635, 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richtler, T., Salinas, R., Lane, R. R., Hilker, M., Schirmer, M.et al. 2015, A&A, 574, A21Google Scholar
Salinas, R., Alabi, A., Richtler, T., Lane, R. R.et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A59Google Scholar
Tal, T., van Dokkum, P. G., Nelan, J., Bezanson, R.et al. 2009, AJ, 138, 1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dokkum, P. G.et al. 2010, ApJ, 709, 1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar