Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T05:51:54.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A way to detect the magnetic helicity using the observable polarized radio emission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2011

Rodion Stepanov  and
Antonina Volegova
Rodion Stepanov
Affiliation:
Institute of Continuous Media Mechanics, Ac. Koroleva str. 1, 614013 Perm, Russia email: [email protected]
Antonina Volegova
Affiliation:
Institute of Continuous Media Mechanics, Ac. Koroleva str. 1, 614013 Perm, Russia email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We discuss inverse problem of detection turbulence magnetic field helical properties using radio survey observations statistics. In this paper, we present principal solution which connects magnetic helicity and correlation between Faraday rotation measure and polarization degree of radio synchrotron emission. The effect of depolarization plays the main role in this problem and allows to detect magnetic helicity for certain frequency range of observable radio emission. We show that the proposed method is mainly sensitive to a large-scale magnetic field component.

Keywords

ISM: magnetic fieldsmethods: data analysis
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 6 , Symposium S274: Advances in Plasma Astrophysics , September 2010 , pp. 185 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Beck, R. 2007, Adv. Radio Sc., 5, 399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenburg, A. 2001, ApJ, 550, 824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenburg, A. 2007, Highlights of Astronomy, 14, 291Google Scholar
Denisov, S. A., Noskov, V. I., Stepanov, R. A., & Frick, P. G. 2008, JETP Lett., 88, 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frick, P., Noskov, V., Denisov, S., & Stepanov, R.. 2010, PRL, 105, 184502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, A. & Shukurov, A. 2006, MNRAS, 371, L21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahniashvili, T. 2006, New Astronomy Review, 50, 1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahniashvili, T. & Vachaspati, T. 2006, Phys. Rev. D, 73, 063507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, F. & Rädler, K.-H. 1980, Mean-field magnetohydrodynamics and dynamo theory, ed. Williams, L. O.Google Scholar
Mininni, P. D. 2007, Phys. Rev. E, 76, 026316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, E. N. 1979, Cosmical magnetic fields: Their origin and their activity, ed. Parker, E. N.Google Scholar
Pipin, V. V. 2007, AZh, 51, 411Google Scholar
Ruzmaikin, A. A., Sokolov, D. D., & Shukurov, A. M. 1988, Magnetic fields of galaxies (M.: Nauka), 280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukurov, A., Sokoloff, D., Subramanian, K., & Brandenburg, A. 2006, A&A, 448, L33Google Scholar
Sokoloff, D. 2007, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 49, 447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefani, F., Gailitis, A., & Gerbeth, G. 2008, Zamm-Zeitschrift Fur Angewandte Mathematik Und Mechanik, 88, 930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., Sokoloff, D., Rogachevskii, I., et al. . 2006, MNRAS, 365, 276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zweibel, E. G. & Heiles, C. 1997, Nat, 385, 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar