Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:05:25.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wave propagation in multiple flux tubes and chromospheric heating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

S. S. Hasan ,
A. van Ballegooijen  and
O. Steiner
S. S. Hasan
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore, India, email: [email protected]
A. van Ballegooijen
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, U.S.A.
O. Steiner
Affiliation:
Kiepenheuer Institut für Sonnenphysik, Freiburg, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This investigation is a continuation of earlier work on the dynamics of the magnetic network. In a previous calculation (Hasan et al. 2005), we examined the response of a single flux tube to transverse motions of its footpoints. We now extend this analysis to a more realistic model of the network consisting of multiple flux tubes. We apply a transverse velocity perturbation uniformly along the lower boundary located at the base of the photosphere. Our 2-D MHD simulations enable us to study the complex wave pattern due to waves generated in the individual tubes as well as their interaction with those emanating from adjacent tubes. Our results show that the dominant heating of the chromosphere occurs due to slow magnetoacoustic waves in a region that is close to the central region of the flux tube.

Keywords

wavesMHDSun: atmosphereSun: photosphereSun: chromosphereSun: oscillations
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S247: Waves & Oscillations in the Solar Atmosphere: Heating and Magneto-Seismology , September 2007 , pp. 82 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Bogdan, T.J. et al. Carlsson, M.Hansteen, V., McMurry, A., Rosenthal, C. S. et al. 2003, ApJ, 599, 626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pontieu, B., Erdélyi, R., James, S.P. 2004, Nature, 430, 536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, S.S., Kalkofen, W., van Ballegoiijen, A.A.Steiner, O. 2005, ApJ, 631, 1270 (Paper 1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S.P., Erdélyi, R. 2002, Astron. Astrophys., 393, L11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, C.S., Bogdan, T. J., Carlsson, M., Dorch, S. B. F., Hansteen, et al. 2002, ApJ, 564, 508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, O., Knölker, M. & Schüssler, M. 1994, in: Rutten, R. J. & Schrijver, C. J. (eds.), Solar Surface Magnetism, NATO ASI Ser. C-433 (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 441Google Scholar