Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:49:28.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using Videoconferencing for Elementary/Secondary Teacher Professional Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2011

Mary Kay Hemenway
Affiliation:
Astronomy Department, University of Texas1 University Station C1400Austin, TX 78712, USA email: [email protected]
Marc Wetzel
Affiliation:
McDonald Observatory, University of TexasFrank N. Bash Visitors Center, Fort Davis, TX 79734, USA email: [email protected]
Magdalena Rood
Affiliation:
Third Coast Research and Development1108 S. First StAustin, TX 78704USA email: [email protected], [email protected]
Cynthia Roberts-Gray
Affiliation:
Third Coast Research and Development1108 S. First StAustin, TX 78704USA email: [email protected], [email protected]
Sandra Preston
Affiliation:
McDonald Observatory, University of Texas1 University Station C1402Austin, TX 78712, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Working within a large geographic area, McDonald Observatory lacks the resources to send staff to present professional development workshops to teachers – and only limited numbers of teachers have the resources to attend workshops at our observatory. Our solution is the development of a new program to bring the workshop to teachers in their own communities through videoconferencing. Each workshop location has a co-facilitator who prepared for his/her duties through an orientation/training session held at McDonald Observatory. At the observatory, they experienced a variety of activities and selected the ones most suitable for the grade-levels of the teachers in their region; they recruit the teachers for the local workshop. Each videoconference session includes pre/post assessment of the participants, an interactive videoconference with an expert presenter, and assistance from the co-facilitator who manages the materials and assists with the activities. Through use of this technology, we expect to reach 500 teachers. An independent evaluator is preparing formative and summative evaluation for the project.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Barufaldi, J. P. & Reinhartz, J. 2002, in Models of Science Teacher Preparation. Theory into practice, Lavoie, D. R. & Roth, W. M. (eds) (Kluwer: Dordrecht), p. 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAER (Collaboration for Astronomy Education Research), 1999, Introductory Astronomy Survey, http://solar.physics.montana.edu/aae/adt/ADTv2.0.PDFGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, P., Arrington, J., Whitworth, J. 2002, in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science http://www2.ed.psu.edu/ci/journals/2002aets/02file1.aspGoogle Scholar
Hufnagel, B. 2002, Astronomy Education Review, 1, 47.Google Scholar
Preston, S., Hemenway, M. K., Wetzel, M., Mace, K. & Yarbrough, B. 2008, in Communicating Astronomy with the Public, Proceedings from the IAU/National Observatory of Athens/ESA/ESO Conference, Christensen, L. L., Zoulias, M. & Robson, I. (eds) (Athens: Eugenides Foundation), p. 500Google Scholar
Whitesides, G. M. et al. (eds) 2007, Rising above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future, (Washington, D. C.: The National Academies Press)Google Scholar