Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:33:57.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Tully-Fisher Relation in Numerical Simulations of Structure Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

María E. De Rossi
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio, CONICET-UBA, CC67 Suc28, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina email: [email protected] Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Rivadavia 1917, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina
Patricia B. Tissera
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio, CONICET-UBA, CC67 Suc28, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina email: [email protected] Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Rivadavia 1917, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina
Susana E. Pedrosa
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio, CONICET-UBA, CC67 Suc28, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina email: [email protected] Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Rivadavia 1917, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (1428), Argentina
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Tully-Fisher Relation (TFR) is of fundamental importance for galaxy formation as it provides information about the relation between the baryonic content of galaxies and the depth of their dark halos potential wells. In recent years, it has been possible to study this relation at different redshifts. However, there are still controversies about its origin and evolution. In this work, we try to address the origin of the Tully-Fisher Relation by employing cosmological hydrodynamical simulations.

Type
Poster Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Bell, E. F. & de Jong, R. S. 2001, ApJ, 550, 212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cresci, G., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puech, M., et al. 2008, A&A, 484, 173Google Scholar
Scannapieco, C., Tissera, P. B., White, S. D. M., & Springel, V. 2006, MNRAS, 364, 552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scannapieco, C., Tissera, P. B., White, S. D. M., & Springel, V. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Tormen, G., & Kauffmann, G. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, R. B. & Fisher, R. J. 1977, A&A, 54, 661Google Scholar