Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:12:43.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time ephemeris and general relativistic scale factor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Toshio Fukushima
Toshio Fukushima*
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 181-8588, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Time ephemeris is the location-independent part of the transformation formula relating two time coordinates such as TCB and TCG (Fukushima 1995). It is computed from the corresponding (space) ephemerides providing the relative motion of two spatial coordinate origins such as the motion of geocenter relative to the solar system barycenter. The time ephemerides are inevitably needed in conducting precise four dimensional coordinate transformations among various spacetime coordinate systems such as the GCRS and BCRS (Soffel et al. 2003). Also, by means of the time average operation, they are used in determining the information on scale conversion between the pair of coordinate systems, especially the difference of the general relativistic scale factor from unity such as LC. In 1995, we presented the first numerically-integrated time ephemeris, TE245, from JPL's planetary ephemeris DE245 (Fukushima 1995). It gave an estimate of LC as 1.4808268457(10) × 10−8, which was incorrect by around 2 × 10−16. This was caused by taking the wrong sign of the post-Newtonian contribution in the final summation. Four years later, we updated TE245 to TE405 associated with DE405 (Irwin and Fukushima 1999). This time the renewed vale of LC is 1.48082686741(200) × 10−8 Another four years later, by using a precise technique of time average, we improved the estimate of Newtonian part of LC for TE405 as 1.4808268559(6) × 10−8 (Harada and Fukushima 2003). This leads to the value of LC as LC = 1.48082686732(110) × 10−8. If we combine this with the constant defining the mean rate of TCG-TT, LG = 6.969290134 × 10−10 (IAU 2001), we estimate the numerical value of another general relativistic scale factor LB = 1.55051976763(110) × 10−8, which has the meaning of the mean rate of TCB-TT. The main reasons of the uncertainties are the truncation effect in time average and the uncertainty of asteroids' perturbation. The former is a natural limitation caused by the finite length of numerical planetary ephemerides and the latter is due to the uncertainty of masses of some heavy asteroids. As a compact realization of the time ephemeris, we prepared HF2002, a Fortran routine to compute approximate harmonic series of TE405 with the RMS error of 0.446 ns for the period 1600 to 2200 (Harada and Fukushima 2003). It is included in the IERS Convention 2003 (McCarthy and Petit 2003) and available from the IERS web site; http://tai.bipm.org/iers/conv2003/conv2003_c10.html.

Keywords

general relativityephemeridesreference systemstime
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S261: Relativity in Fundamental Astronomy: Dynamics, Reference Frames, and Data Analysis , April 2009 , pp. 89 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Bretagnon, P., 1982, Astron. Astrophys., 114, 278Google Scholar
Chapront-Touzé, M., Chapront, J., 1983, Astron. Astrophys., 124, 50Google Scholar
Fairhead, L., Bretagnon, P., Lestrade, J. F., 1988, Proc. IAU Symp, 128, 419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairhead, L. & Bretagnon, P., 1990, Astron. Astrophys., 229, 240Google Scholar
Fukushima, T., 1995, Astron. Astrophys., 294, 895Google Scholar
Fukushima, T., Fujimoto, M.-K., Aoki, Sh., & Kinoshita, H., 1986, Celestial Mechanics, 36, 215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harada, W., 2003, M. Sc. Thesis, Univ. TokyoGoogle Scholar
Harada, W. & Fukushima, T., 2003, Astron. J., 126, 2557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harada, W. & Fukushima, T., 2004, Astron. J., 127, 531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirayama, Th., Fujimoto, M.-K., Kinoshita, H., & Fukushima, T., 1987, Proc. IAG Symposia at IUGG XIX General Assembly, Tome I, 91Google Scholar
International Astronomical Union, 1992, in Proc. 21st General Assembly Buenos Aires 1991, Trans. of IAU XXIB, IAU, ParisGoogle Scholar
International Astronomical Union, 2001, in Proc. 24th General Assembly Manchester 2000, Trans. of IAU XXIVB, IAU, ParisGoogle Scholar
Irwin, A. W. & Fukushima, T., 1999, Astron. Astrophys., 348, 642Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. D. & Petit, G., 2003, IERS Convention (2003), IERS Tech. Note 32, Obs. Paris, ParisGoogle Scholar
Moyer, T. D., 1981a, Celest. Mech. 23, 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, T. D., 1981b, Celest. Mech. 23, 57Google Scholar
Newhall, X. X, 1989, Celest. Mech. 45, 305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P., 2007, Numerical Recipes: the Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Seidelmann, P. K. & Fukushima, T., 1992, Astron. Astrophys., 265, 833Google Scholar
Soffel, M., Klioner, S. A., Petit, G., Wolf, P., Kopeikin, S. M., Bretagnon, P., Brumberg, V. A., Capitaine, N., Damour, T., Fukushima, T., Guinot, B., Huang, T.-Y., Lindegren, L., Ma, C., Nordtvedt, K., Ries, J. C., Seidelmann, P. K., Vokrouhlicky, D., Will, C. M., & Xu, C., 2003, Astron. J., 126, 2687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standish, E. M., 1998a, JPL Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides, DE405/LE405, JPL interoffice memorandum 312.F-98-048Google Scholar
Standish, E. M., 1998b, Astron. Astrophys., 336, 381Google Scholar
Standish, E. M., Newhall, X. X., Williams, J. G., & Yeomans, D. K., 1992, Orbital Ephemerides of the Sun, Moon, and Planets. In: Seidelmann, P. K. (ed.) Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac, University Science Books, Mill Valley, CAGoogle Scholar