Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:37:07.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Testing convection in stellar models using detached eclipsing binaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

John Southworth  and
Hans Bruntt
John Southworth
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK email: [email protected]
Hans Bruntt
Affiliation:
School of Physics A28, University of Sydney, 2006 NSW, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The fundamental properties of detached eclipsing binary stars can be measured very accurately, which could make them important objects for constraining the treatment of convection in theoretical stellar models. However, only four or five pieces of information can be found for the average system, which is not enough. We discuss studies of more interesting and useful objects: eclipsing binaries in clusters and eclipsing binaries with pulsating components.

Keywords

Convectionstars: binaries: eclipsingstars: oscillations
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 2 , Symposium S239: Convection in Astrophysics , August 2006 , pp. 157 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Andersen, J. 1991, A&ARv 3, 91Google Scholar
Andersen, J., Clausen, J.V. & Nordström, B. 1990, ApJ 363, L33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bragaglia, A. & Tosi, M. 2006, AJ 131, 1544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruntt, H. et al. , 2006, A&A, in pressGoogle Scholar
Chaboyer, B. 1995, ApJ 444, L9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldridge, J.J. & Tout, C.A. 2004, MNRAS 353, 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebreton, Y., Fernandes, J. & Lejeune, T. 2001, A&A 374, 540Google Scholar
Ludwig, H.-G. & Salaris, M. 1999, in ASP Conf. Ser. 173, p. 229Google Scholar
Maeder, A. & Meynet, G. 1989, A&A 210, 155Google Scholar
Meynet, G., Maeder, A. & Ekström, S., 2005, in ASP Conf. Ser. 332, p. 228Google Scholar
Nordström, B. et al. , 2004, A&A 418, 989Google Scholar
Pols, O.R., Tout, C.A., Schroder, K.-P., Eggleton, P.P. & Manners, J. 1997, MNRAS 289, 869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribas, I., Jordi, C. & Giménez, Á. 2000, MNRAS 318, L55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southworth, J. & Clausen, J.V. 2006, A&A, acceptedGoogle Scholar
Southworth, J., Maxted, P.F.L. & Smalley, B. 2004a, MNRAS 349, 547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southworth, J., Maxted, P.F.L. & Smalley, B., 2004b, MNRAS 351, 1277Google Scholar
Southworth, J., Zucker, S., Maxted, P.F.L. & Smalley, B. 2004c, MNRAS 355, 986Google Scholar
Southworth, J., Maxted, P.F.L. & Smalley, B. 2004d, in ASP Conf. Ser. 318, p. 218Google Scholar
Southworth, J., Maxted, P.F.L. & Smalley, B. 2005a, A&A 429, 645Google Scholar
Southworth, J. et al. , 2005b, MNRAS 363, 529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southworth, J., Maxted, P.F.L. & Smalley, B. 2005c, in IAU Colloq. 196, p. 361Google Scholar
Thompson, I.B. et al. , 2001, AJ 121, 3089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VandenBerg, D.A., Bergbusch, P.A. & Dowler, P.D. 2006, ApJS 162, 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar