Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:51:17.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technical and Observational Challenges for Future Time-Domain Surveys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

Joshua S. Bloom
Joshua S. Bloom*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

By the end of the last decade, robotic telescopes were established as effective alternatives to the traditional role of astronomer in planning, conducting and reducing time-domain observations. By the end of this decade, machines will play a much more central role in the discovery and classification of time-domain events observed by such robots. While this abstraction of humans away from the real-time loop (and the nightly slog of the nominal scientific process) is inevitable, just how we will get there as a community is uncertain. I discuss the importance of machine learning in astronomy today, and project where we might consider heading in the future. I will also touch on the role of people and organisations in shaping and maximising the scientific returns of the coming data deluge.

Keywords

methods: data analysis—methods: statistical—techniques: photometric—surveys—stars: variables—sociology of astronomy—history and philosophy of astronomy
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 7 , Symposium S285: New Horizons in Time-Domain Astronomy , September 2011 , pp. 165 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Bloom, J. S. & Richards, J. W. 2011, arxiv/1104.3142Google Scholar
Bloom, J. S., et al. , 2011, ArXiv e-printsGoogle Scholar
Kasliwal, M. M. 2011, PhD thesis, California Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
Kowal, C. T. & Drake, S. 1980, Nature, 287, 311Google Scholar
Morgan, A., et al. , 2012, PASP, in pressGoogle Scholar
Nugent, P.E., et al. , 2011, Nature, in pressGoogle Scholar
Peng, R. D. 2011, Science, 334, 1226Google Scholar
Protopapas, P., et al. , 2006, MNRAS, 369, 677Google Scholar
Rebbapragada, U., Protopapas, P., Brodley, C. E., & Alcock, C. 2009, in: Bohlender, D.A., Durand, D. and Dowler, P. (eds.), Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVIII, ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 411 (San Francisco: ASP), p. 264Google Scholar
Richards, J., et al. , 2012, in prepGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. W., et al. , 2011a, arxiv/1106.2832Google Scholar
Richards, J. W. 2011b, ApJ, 733, 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A.M., et al. , 2011, MNRAS, 412, 1309Google Scholar
Stekhoven, D. J.. & Bühlmann, P. 2011, arxiv/1105.0828Google Scholar