Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T05:45:51.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Supernovæ

Workshop 8

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2019

M. Stritzinger  and
T. J. Moriya
M. Stritzinger
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark email: [email protected]
T. J. Moriya
Affiliation:
NAOJ, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This Workshop covered a cornucopia of topics that were featured in short formal presentations, followed by a round-table discussion. G. Hosseinzadeh and H. Kuncarayakti presented the results of their recent researches into interacting supernovæ. They included both the intriguing Type Ibn supernova subclass, and SN 2017dio, which appears to be the first Type Ic supernova to be seen to exhibit signatures of hydrogen-rich circumstellar interaction at all phases. M. Sullivan provided a summary relating to the future of transient science in the era of Big Data, and participants discussed strategies to determine which targets and fields should be selected for spectroscopic follow-up. The Workshop concluded with a rather heated discussion regarding the need for the IAU Supernovæ Working Group to consider modifying the current criterion for a confirmed supernova in order for it to receive an official IAU designation.

Keywords

Supernovætransient surveysIAU transient naming criterion
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 14 , Symposium S339: Southern Horizons in Time-Domain Astronomy , November 2017 , pp. 245 - 250
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2019 

Footnotes

†

Fellow of the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan

References

Baade, W., & Zwicky, F. 1934, Proc. Natl. Academy of Sciences, 20, p. 254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Ami, S., Gal-Yam, A., Mazzali, P. A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 785, 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunthaler, A., Menten, K. M., Reid, M. J., et al. 2009, A&A, 499, L17Google Scholar
Cartier, R., Gutierrez, C. P., Smith, M., et al. 2017, ATel, 10334Google Scholar
Chugai, N. N., & Chevalier, R. A. 2006, ApJ, 641, 1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drout, M. R., Chornock, R., Soderberg, A. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosseinzadeh, G., Arcavi, I., Valenti, S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimani, N., Sendlinger, K., Brunthaler, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 593, 18Google Scholar
Kool, E. C., Ryder, S., Kankare, E., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 564110.1093/mnras/stx2463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuncarayakti, H., Maeda, K., Ashall, C. J., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 14LCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leloudas, G., Hsiao, E. Y., Johansson, J., et al. 2015, A&A, 574, 61Google Scholar
Matheson, T., Filippenko, A. V., Chornock, R., et al. 2000, AJ, 119, 230310.1086/301352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattila, S., Fraser, M., Smartt, S. J., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milisavljevic, D., Margutti, R., Kamble, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 815, 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriya, T.J., & Maeda, K. 2016, ApJ, 824, 10010.3847/0004-637X/824/2/100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, N. E., Soderberg, A. M., Foley, R. J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 769, 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, M. 2013, Astron. Geophys., 54, 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taddia, F., Sollerman, J., Leloudas, G., et al. 2015, A&A, 574, 60Google Scholar
Pastorello, A., Smartt, S. J., Mattila, S., et al. 2007, Nature, 447, 829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinko, J., Pooley, D., Silverman, J.M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 837, 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, L., Lunnan, R., Perley, D.A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 848, 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar