Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:37:10.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The sub-solar initial mass function in the Large Magellanic Cloud†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

Dimitrios A. Gouliermis
Dimitrios A. Gouliermis*
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Magellanic Clouds offer a unique variety of star forming regions seen as bright nebulae of ionized gas, related to bright young stellar associations. Nowadays, observations with the high resolving efficiency of the Hubble Space Telescope allow the detection of the faintest infant stars, and a more complete picture of clustered star formation in our dwarf neighbors has emerged. I present results from our studies of the Magellanic Clouds, with emphasis in the young low-mass pre-main sequence populations. Our data include imaging with the Advanced Camera for Surveys of the association LH 95 in the Large Magellanic Cloud, the deepest observations ever taken with HST of this galaxy. I discuss our findings in terms of the initial mass function, which we constructed with an unprecedented completeness down to the sub-solar regime, as the outcome of star formation in the low-metallicity environment of the LMC.

Keywords

Magellanic Cloudsgalaxies: star clustersopen clusters and associations: individual (NGC 346, NGC 602, LH 52, LH 95)stars: evolutionstars: pre–main-sequencestars: luminosity functionmass function
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 4 , Symposium S256: The Magellanic System: Stars, Gas, and Galaxies , July 2008 , pp. 250 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2009

References

Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., & Bromm, V. 2002, MNRAS, 332, L65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandl, B., Brandner, W., Eisenhauer, F., et al. 1999, A&A, 352, L69Google Scholar
Briceño, C., Luhman, K. L., Hartmann, L., Stauffer, J. R., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. 2002, ApJ, 580, 317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R. D., Elliot, K. H., & Meaburn, J. 1976, MemRAS, 81, 89Google Scholar
Da Rio, N., Gouliermis, D., & Henning, T. 2009, ApJ, in pressGoogle Scholar
Elmegreen, B. G. 2004, MNRAS, 354, 367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, Y., Mizuno, N., Yamaguchi, R., et al. 1999, PASJ, 51, 745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girardi, L., Bertelli, G., Bressan, A., Chiosi, C., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Marigo, P., Salasnich, B., & Weiss, A. 2002, A&A, 391, 195Google Scholar
Gouliermis, D., Keller, S. C., de Boer, K. S., Kontizas, M., & Kontizas, E. 2002, A&A, 381, 862Google Scholar
Gouliermis, D., Kontizas, M., Kontizas, E., & Korakitis, R. 2003, A&A, 405, 111Google Scholar
Gouliermis, D., Brandner, W., & Henning, T. 2006a, ApJ, 636, L133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouliermis, D. A., Dolphin, A. E., Brandner, W., & Henning, T. 2006b, ApJS, 166, 549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouliermis, D. A., Henning, T., Brandner, W., et al. 2007, ApJ, 665, L27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennekemper, E., Gouliermis, D. A., Henning, T., et al. 2008, ApJ, 672, 914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. S., Cheng, K.-P., Bohlin, R. C., O'Connell, R. W., Roberts, M. S., Smith, A. M., & Stecher, T. P. 1995, ApJ, 446, 622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, L. A., Massey, P., Strom, S. E., & Merrill, K. M. 1993, AJ, 106, 1906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S., Dopita, M. A., Staveley-Smith, L., Bessell, M. S. 1999, AJ, 118, 2797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroupa, P. 2002, Science, 295, 82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroupa, P. & Bouvier, J. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lada, E. A., Lada, C. J., & Muench, A. 1998, in Gilmore, G. & Howell, D., The Stellar Initial Mass Function, ASP Conf.Ser. 142, p 107Google Scholar
Luhman, K. L., Rieke, G. H., Young, E. T., Cotera, A. S., Chen, H., Rieke, M. J., Schneider, G., & Thompson, R. I. 2000, ApJ, 540, 1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkov, O. & Zinnecker, H. 2001, MNRAS, 321, 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, P. 2003, ARAA, 41, 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, P. 2006, in Livio, M. & Brown, T. M., The Local Group as an Astrophysical Laboratory (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), p. 164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nota, A., Sirianni, M., Sabbi, E., et al. 2006, ApJ, 640, L29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padoan, P. & Nordlund, Å. 2002, ApJ, 576, 870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palla, F. & Stahler, S. W. 1999, ApJ, 525, 772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, J. Wm., Hill, J. K., Cornett, R. H., et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preibisch, T., Brown, A. G. A., Bridges, T., Guenther, E., & Zinnecker, H. 2002, AJ, 124, 404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preibisch, T., Stanke, T., & Zinnecker, H. 2003, A&A, 409, 147Google Scholar
Reid, N. 1998, in Gilmore, G. & Howell, D., The Stellar Initial Mass Function, ASP Conf. Ser. 142, p. 121Google Scholar
Sabbi, E., Sirianni, M., Nota, A., et al. 2008, AJ, 135, 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalo, J. 1998, in Gilmore, G. & Howell, D., The Stellar Initial Mass Function, ASP Conf.Ser. 142, p. 201Google Scholar
Schmalzl, M., Gouliermis, D. A., Dolphin, A. E., & Henning, T. 2008, ApJ, 681, 290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherry, W. H., Walter, F. M., & Wolk, S. J. 2004, AJ, 128, 2316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siess, L., Dufour, E., & Forestini, M. 2000, A&A, 358, 593Google Scholar
Westerlund, B. E. 1997, The Magellanic Clouds (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar