Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:15:14.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stellar Variabilities: Challenges for the Detection and Characterization of Exoplanets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

I. Boisse ,
X. Dumusque ,
N. C. Santos ,
M. Oshagh ,
X. Bonfils ,
M. Montalto ,
G. Boué  and
C. Lovis
I. Boisse
Affiliation:
Centro de Astrofísica, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal email: [email protected]
X. Dumusque
Affiliation:
Centro de Astrofísica, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal email: [email protected] Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 Ch. des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland
N. C. Santos
Affiliation:
Centro de Astrofísica, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal email: [email protected] Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
M. Oshagh
Affiliation:
Centro de Astrofísica, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal email: [email protected] Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
X. Bonfils
Affiliation:
UJF-Grenoble1/CNRS-INSU, Institut de Planétologie et d'Astrophysique de Grenoble, UMR 5274, Grenoble, F-38041, France
M. Montalto
Affiliation:
Centro de Astrofísica, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal email: [email protected]
G. Boué
Affiliation:
Centro de Astrofísica, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal email: [email protected]
C. Lovis
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 Ch. des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The photometric and RV techniques, although extremely efficient to detect and characterize planets, are, however, indirect techniques (as well as astrometry). Phenomena such as stellar pulsation, inhomogeneous convection, spots or magnetic cycles can prevent us from finding planets or they might degrade the parameters estimation. We will consider the challenges related to the knowledge of stellar activity for the next decade: detect telluric planets in the habitable zone of their stars (from G to M dwarfs), understand the activity in the low-mass end of M dwarf (on which will focus future near-infrared high-resolution spectrograph like SPIRou or CARMENES), limitation to the process of summing several transit observations (in order to characterize the atmospheric components) due to the variability of stellar activity (from the ground or with Spitzer or JWST), as well as the methods proposed and used to overcome this issue.

Keywords

Techniques: radial velocitiesphotometryStars: activityDynamoPlanetary system
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S293: Formation, Detection, and Characterization of Extrasolar Habitable Planets , August 2012 , pp. 388 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Artigau, E., Donati, J.-F., & Delfosse, X. 2011, ASPC, 448, 771Google Scholar
Baliunas, S., Donahue, R., Soon, W., et al. 1995, ApJ, 438, 269Google Scholar
Bean, J., Seifahrt, A., Hartman, H., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, 410Google Scholar
Berta, Z., Charbonneau, D., Bean, J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 12Google Scholar
Boisse, I., Moutou, C., Vidal-Madjar, A., et al. 2009, A&A, 495, 959Google Scholar
Boisse, I., Bouchy, F., Hébrard, G., et al. 2011, A&A, 528, A4Google Scholar
Boisse, I., Pepe, F., Perrier, C., et al. 2012a, A&A, 545, 55Google Scholar
Boisse, I., Bonfils, X., & Santos, N. C. 2012b, A&A, 545, 109Google Scholar
Bonfils, X., Mayor, M., Delfosse, X., et al. 2007, A&A, 474, 293Google Scholar
Bonfils, X., Delfosse, X., Udry, S., et al. 2013, A&A 549 id.A109Google Scholar
Charbonneau, et al. 2008, AAS, 212, 4402CGoogle Scholar
Czesla, S., Huber, K., Wolter, U., et al. 2009, A&A, 505, 1277Google Scholar
Désert, J.-M., Charbonneau, D., Demory, B.-O., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desort, M., Lagrange, A;-M., Galland, F., Udry, S., & Mayor, M. 2007, A&A, 473, 983Google Scholar
Dumusque, X., Udry, S., Lovis, C., Santos, N. C., & Monteiro, M. 2011a, A&A, 525, 140Google Scholar
Dumusque, X., Santos, N. C., Udry, S., Lovis, C., & Bonfils, X. 2011b, A&A, 527, 82Google Scholar
Dumusque, X., Lovis, C., Ségransan, D., et al. 2011c, A&A, 535, 55Google Scholar
Ferraz-Mello, S., Tadeu Dos Santos, M., Beaugé, C., et al. 2011, A&A, 531, 161Google Scholar
Gomes da Silva, J., Santos, N. C., Bonfils, X., et al. 2012, A&A, 541, 9Google Scholar
Hatzes, A., Dvorak, R., Wuchterl, G., et al. 2010, A&A, 520, 93Google Scholar
Huélamo, N., Figueira, P., Bonfils, X., et al. 2008, A&A, 489, L9Google Scholar
Knutson, H. A., Madhusudhan, N., Cowan, N., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovis, C., Dumusque, X., Santos, N. C., et al. 2011, arXiv:1107.5325Google Scholar
Martin, E., Guenther, E., ZapateroOsorio, M. Osorio, M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, 75Google Scholar
Melo, C., Santos, N. C., Gieren, W., et al. 2007, A&A, 467, 721Google Scholar
Moutou, C., Mayor, M., LoCurto, G., et al. 2011, A&A, 527, 63Google Scholar
Nutzman, , Fabrycky, & Fortney, 2011, ApJ, 740, L10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oshagh, M., Boisse, I., Boué, G., et al. 2013, A&A 549 id.A35Google Scholar
Pepe, F., Lovis, C., Ségransan, D., et al. 2011, A&A, 534A, 58P1Google Scholar
Pont, F., Gilliland, R. L., Moutou, C., et al. 2007, A&A, 476, 1347Google Scholar
Pont, F., Sing, D., Gibson, N., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 2917Google Scholar
Prato, L., Huerta, M., Johns-Krull, C., et al. 2008, ApJ, 687, 103Google Scholar
Rabus, M., Alonso, R., Belmonte, J., et al. 2009, A&A, 494, 391Google Scholar
Queloz, D., Henry, G. W., Sivan, J.-P., et al. 2001, A&A, 379, 279Google Scholar
Queloz, D., Bouchy, F., Moutou, C., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 303Google Scholar
Quirrenbach, A., Amado, P. J., Seifart, W., et al. 2012, SPIE, 8446E0RQGoogle Scholar
Sanchis-Ojeda, R., Winn, J. N., Holman, M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, 127Google Scholar
Sanchis-Ojeda, & Winn, 2011, ApJ, 743, 61Google Scholar
Santos, N. C., Bouchy, F., Mayor, M., et al. 2004, A&A, 426L, 19Google Scholar
Santos, N. C., Gomes da Silva, J., Lovis, C., & Melo, C. 2010, A&A, 511, 54Google Scholar
Ségransan, D., Mayor, M., Udry, S., et al. 2011, A&A, 535, 54Google Scholar
Sing, D., Pont, F., Aigrain, S., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 1443Google Scholar
West, A., Hawley, S., Walkowicz, L., et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 426Google Scholar
Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., et al. 2008, ApJ, 683, 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar