Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:39:41.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The stellar mass distribution of S4G disk galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2017

Simón Díaz-García
Affiliation:
Astronomy Research Group, University of Oulu, FI-90014 Finland email: [email protected]
Heikki Salo
Affiliation:
Astronomy Research Group, University of Oulu, FI-90014 Finland email: [email protected]
Eija Laurikainen
Affiliation:
Astronomy Research Group, University of Oulu, FI-90014 Finland email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We use 3.6 μm imaging from the S4G survey to characterize the typical stellar density profiles (Σ*) and bars as a function of fundamental galaxy parameters (e.g. the total stellar mass M*), providing observational constraints for galaxy simulation models to be compared with. We rescale galaxy images to a common frame determined by the size in physical units, by their disk scalelength, or by their bar size and orientation. We stack the resized images to obtain statistically representative average stellar disks and bars. For a given M* bin (≥ 109M), we find a significant difference in the stellar density profiles of barred and non-barred systems that gives evidence for bar-induced secular evolution of disk galaxies: (i) disks in barred galaxies show larger scalelengths and fainter extrapolated central surface brightnesses, (ii) the mean surface brightness profiles of barred and non-barred galaxies intersect each other slightly beyond the mean bar length, most likely at the bar corotation, and (iii) the central mass concentration of barred galaxies is larger (by almost a factor 2 when T < 5) than in their non-barred counterparts. We also show that early- and intermediate-type spirals (0 ≤ T < 5) host intrinsically narrower bars than the later types and S0s, whose bars are oval-shaped. We show a clear correlation between galaxy family and bar ellipticity.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2017 

References

Athanassoula, E. 1992, MNRAS, 259, 328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanassoula, E. & Misiriotis, A. 2002, MNRAS, 330, 35 Google Scholar
Athanassoula, E. 2012, MNRAS, 426, L46 Google Scholar
Athanassoula, E. 2013, Bars and secular evolution in disk galaxies: Theoretical input, ed. Falcón-Barroso, J. & Knapen, J. H., 305Google Scholar
Buta, R. J., Sheth, K., Athanassoula, E., et al. 2015, ApJS, 217, 32 Google Scholar
Debattista, V. P., Mayer, L., Carollo, C. M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 209 Google Scholar
Díaz-García, S., Salo, H., Laurikainen, E., & Herrera-Endoqui, M. 2016, A&A, 587, A160 Google Scholar
Herrera-Endoqui, M., Díaz-García, S., Laurikainen, E., & Salo, H. 2015, A&A, 582, A86 Google Scholar
Hohl, F. 1971, ApJ, 168, 343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapen, J. H., Shlosman, I., & Peletier, R. F. 2000, ApJ, 529, 93 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurikainen, E. & Salo, H. 2002, MNRAS, 337, 1118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurikainen, E., Salo, H., & Buta, R. 2004, ApJ, 607, 103 Google Scholar
Laurikainen, E., Salo, H., Buta, R., & Knapen, J. H. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchev, I., Famaey, B., & Combes, F. 2011, A&A, 527, A147 Google Scholar
Muñoz-Mateos, J. C., Sheth, K., Regan, M., et al. 2015, ApJS, 219, 3 Google Scholar
Salo, H., Rautiainen, P., Buta, R., et al. 1999, AJ, 117, 792 Google Scholar
Salo, H., Laurikainen, E., Laine, J., et al. 2015, ApJS, 219, 4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Janssen, R. & Gadotti, D. A. 2013, MNRAS, 432, L56 Google Scholar
Sheth, K., Regan, M., Hinz, J. L., et al. 2010, PASP, 122, 1397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wada, K. & Habe, A. 1992, MNRAS, 258, 82 Google Scholar