Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:51:38.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Star Formation History in the Illustris TNG Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2023

András Péter Joó
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy, Eötvös Loránd University
Bendegúz Koncz
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy, Eötvös Loránd University
Sandor Pinter
Affiliation:
Dept. of Natural Science, University of Public Service, Hungary
L. Viktor Tóth
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy, Eötvös Loránd University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We processed the catalogue data for all snapshots of the Illustris TNG100 cosmological simulation and collected every calculated property of the galaxies formed at different redshifts. With this dataset we can statistically analyze parameters for galaxy samples at given redshifts, as well as trace sample parameters over the entire time range of the simulation. Focusing first on star formation rate (SFR) and metallicity, we see the cosmic star formation history with the mean maximum at around z ≈ 1.6 and the reionization bump at around z ≈ 5, while metallicity increases. For a sample of strongly star-forming galaxies with SFR > 10 M yr−1 we found different characteristics compared to the whole sample. The mean metallicity of highly star-forming galaxies is higher and changes less, and the mean SFR has its maximum at around the reionization bump.

Type
Poster Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Springel et al. 2018. MNRAS, 475, 676. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinacci et al. 2018. MNRAS, 480, 5113. doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson et al. 2018. MNRAS, 475, 624. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillepich et al. 2018. MNRAS, 475, 648. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naiman et al. 2018. MNRAS, 477, 1206. doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty618 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bignone et al. 2017. MNRAS, 469, 4921. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer et al. 2015. MNRAS, 453, 3593. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1893 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thélie et al. 2022. A&A, 658, A139 doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141748 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rácz et al. 2018. AN, 339:347–351. doi.: 10.1002/asna.201813503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tóth et al. 2019. MNRAS, 486, 4823. doi.: 10.1093/mnras/stz1188 Google Scholar
Horvath et al. 2022. Universe, 8(4), 221. doi: 10.3390/universe8040221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Joó et al. supplementary material

Joó et al. supplementary material

Download Joó et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 598 KB