Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:51:06.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Star clusters with dual red clumps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Léo Girardi
Affiliation:
Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Italy
Stefano Rubele
Affiliation:
Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Italy Dipartimento di Astronomia, Università di Padova, Italy
Leandro Kerber
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A few star clusters in the Magellanic Clouds exhibit composite structures in the red-clump region of their colour–magnitude diagrams. The most striking case is NGC 419 in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), where the red clump is composed of a main blob as well as a distinct secondary feature. This structure is demonstrated to be real and corresponds to the simultaneous presence of stars which passed through electron degeneracy after central-hydrogen exhaustion and those that did not. This rare occurrence in a single cluster allows us to set stringent constraints on its age and on the efficiency of convective-core overshooting during main-sequence evolution. We present a more detailed analysis of NGC 419, together with a first look at other populous Large Magellanic Cloud clusters which are apparently in the same phase: NGC 1751, NGC 1783, NGC 1806, NGC 1846, NGC 1852 and NGC 1917. We also compare these Magellanic Cloud cases with their Galactic counterparts, NGC 752 and NGC 7789. We emphasise the extraordinary potential of these clusters as absolute calibration marks on the age scale of stellar populations.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Bastian, N. & de Mink, S. E. 2009, MNRAS (Letters), 398, L11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baume, G., Carraro, G., Costa, E., Méndez, R. A., & Girardi, L. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelli, G., Nasi, E., Girardi, L., Chiosi, C., Zoccali, M., & Gallart, C. 2003, AJ, 125, 770Google Scholar
Bica, E., Geisler, D., Dottori, H., Clariá, J. J., Piatti, A. E., & Santos, J. F. C. Jr. 1998, AJ, 116, 723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressan, A., Fagotto, F., Bertelli, G., & Chiosi, C. 1993, A&AS, 100, 647Google Scholar
Brown, A. G. A., Dekker, G., & de Zeeuw, P. T. 1997, MNRAS, 285, 479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupret, M.-A., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 57Google Scholar
Girardi, L. 1999, MNRAS, 308, 818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girardi, L., Mermilliod, J.-C., & Carraro, G. 2000, A&A, 354, 892Google Scholar
Girardi, L., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Weiss, A., & Salaris, M. 1998, MNRAS, 301, 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girardi, L., Rubele, S., & Kerber, L. 2009, MNRAS (Letters), 394, L74Google Scholar
Glatt, K., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerber, L. O., Girardi, L., Rubele, S., & Cioni, M.-R. 2009, A&A, 499, 697Google Scholar
Mackey, A. D., Broby Nielsen, P., Ferguson, A. M. N., & Richardson, J. C. 2008, ApJ (Letters), 681, L17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mermilliod, J.-C., Mathieu, R. D., Latham, D. W., & Mayor, M. 1998, A&A, 339, 423Google Scholar
Milone, A. P., Bedin, L. R., Piotto, G., & Anderson, J. 2009, A&A, 497, 755Google Scholar
Piatti, A. E., Geisler, D., Bica, E., Clariá, J. J., Santos, J. F. C. Jr., Sarajedini, A., & Dottori, H. 1999, AJ, 118, 2865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönberg, M. & Chandrasekhar, S. 1942, ApJ, 96, 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seleznev, A. F., Carraro, G., Costa, E., Loktin, A. V. 2010, NewA, 15, 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, W., 1600, in HamletGoogle Scholar
Spergel, D. N., et al. 2007, ApJS, 170, 377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweigart, A. V., Greggio, L., & Renzini, A. 1990, ApJ, 364, 527Google Scholar