Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:22:08.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Solar cycles reconstructed over the last millennium: Do Waldmeier and Gnevysev-Ohl rules work?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2023

Markus Similä
Affiliation:
Space Physics and Astronomy Research Unit and Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Ilya Usoskin
Affiliation:
Space Physics and Astronomy Research Unit and Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Using tree-ring radiocarbon 14C data, solar cycles are now reconstructed for the last millennium, more than doubling the previously known statistic of direct solar observations and giving a new opportunity to validate basic empirical rules connecting solar cycle lengths, strengths and intensities. This includes the Waldmeier rule relating the cycle’s strength to the length of its ascending phase, and the Gnevyshev-Ohl rule suggesting that cycles are paired so that the intensity of an odd solar cycle is higher than that of the preceding even cycle. Using the extended solar-cycle statistic, we found that the Waldmeier rule remains robust for the well-defined solar cycles implying that it is an intrinsic feature of the solar cycle. However, the validity of the Gnevyshev-Ohl rule is not confirmed at any reasonable statistical level, indicating that either the insufficient accuracy of the reconstructed solar cycles or that this rule is not a robust feature.

Type
Contributed Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Aparicio, A. J. P., Vaquero, J., & Cruz Gallego, M. 2012, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 2, A12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bard, E., Raisbeck, G., Yiou, F., & Jouzel, J. 1997, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 150, 453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, N., Bayliss, A., Christl, M., et al. 2021, Nature Geosci., 14, 10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrasco, V. M. S., Aparicio, A. J. P., Vaquero, J. M., & Gallego, M. C. 2016, Solar Phys., 291, 3045 Google Scholar
Charbonneau, P. 2020, Living Rev. Solar Phys., 17, 4 Google Scholar
Clette, F. & Lefèvre, L. 2016, Solar Phys., 291, 2629 Google Scholar
Gnevyshev, M. N. & Ohl, A. 1948, Astron. Zh., 25, 18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, D., Wilson, R., & Reichmann, E. 2002, Solar Phys., 211, 357 Google Scholar
Hathaway, D. H. 2015, Living Rev. Solar Phys., 12, 4 Google ScholarPubMed
Inceoglu, F., Simoniello, R., Knudsen, V. F., et al. 2015, Astron. Astrophys., 577, A20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karoff, C., Inceoglu, F., Knudsen, M. F., Olsen, J., & Fogtmann-Schulz, A. 2015, Astron. Astrophys., 575, A77 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandy, D. 2021, Solar Phys., 296, 54 Google Scholar
Solanki, S., Krivova, N., Schüssler, M., & Fligge, M. 2002, Astron. Astrophys., 396, 1029 10.1051/0004-6361:20021436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takalo, J. & Mursula, K. 2018, Astron. Astrophys., 620, 100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usoskin, I. G. 2017, Living Rev. Solar Phys., 14, 3 Google Scholar
Usoskin, I. G., Kovaltsov, G., & Kiviaho, W. 2021 a, Solar Phys., 296, 13 Google Scholar
Usoskin, I. G., Mursula, K., Arlt, R., & Kovaltsov, G. A. 2009, Astrophys. J. Lett., 700, L154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usoskin, I. G., Mursula, K., & Kovaltsov, G. A. 2001, Astron. Astrophys., 370, L31 10.1051/0004-6361:20010319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usoskin, I. G., Solanki, S. K., & Kovaltsov, G. A. 2007, Astron. Astrophys., 471, 301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usoskin, I. G., Solanki, S. K., Krivova, N., et al. 2021 b, Astron. Astrophys., 649, A141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usoskin, I. G., Solanki, S. K., Krivova, N., et al. 2022, Astron. Astrophys., 664, C3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldmeier, M. 1935, Astron. Mitt. Z., 6, 105Google Scholar
Waldmeier, M. 1939, Astron. Mitt. Zurich, 14, 470 Google Scholar