Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:47:25.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solar activity due to magnetic complexity of active regions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2011

Brigitte Schmieder ,
Cristina Mandrini ,
Ramesh Chandra ,
Pascal Démoulin ,
Tibor Török ,
Etienne Pariat  and
Wahab Uddin
Brigitte Schmieder
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Paris, LESIA, Meudon, 92195, France email: [email protected]
Cristina Mandrini
Affiliation:
IAFE, CONICET-UBA (FCEN), Buenos Aires, Argentina email: [email protected]
Ramesh Chandra
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Paris, LESIA, Meudon, 92195, France email: [email protected]
Pascal Démoulin
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Paris, LESIA, Meudon, 92195, France email: [email protected]
Tibor Török
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Paris, LESIA, Meudon, 92195, France email: [email protected]
Etienne Pariat
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Paris, LESIA, Meudon, 92195, France email: [email protected]
Wahab Uddin
Affiliation:
ARIES, Nainital, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Active regions (ARs), involved in the Halloween events during October-November 2003, were the source of unusual activity during the following solar rotation. The flares on 18-20 November 2003 that occur in the AR NOAA10501 were accompanied by coronal mass ejections associated to some particularly geoeffective magnetic clouds.

Our analysis of the magnetic flux and helicity injection revealed that a new emerging bipole and consequent shearing motions continuously energized the region during its disk passage. The stored energy was eventually released through the interaction of the various systems of magnetic loops by several magnetic reconnection events. Active events on November 18 (filament eruptions and CMEs) were originated by shearing motions along a section of the filament channel that injected magnetic helicity with sign opposite to that of the AR. Two homologous flares, that occurred on November 20, were apparently triggered by different mechanisms as inferred from the flare ribbons evolution (filament eruption and CMEs). We studied in detail the behaviour of two North-South oriented filaments on November 20 2003. They merged and split following a process suggestive of ‘sling-shot’ reconnection between two coronal flux ropes. We successfully tested this scenario in a 3D MHD simulation that is presented in this paper.

Keywords

Active regionmagnetic helicityfilament reconnection
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 6 , Symposium S273: The Physics of Sun and Star Spots , August 2010 , pp. 164 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Antiochos, S. K., 1998, Astrophys. J. Lett., 502, 181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, R., Pariat, E., Schmieder, B., Mandrini, C. H., & Uddin, W. 2010a, Solar Phys., 261, 127Google Scholar
Chandra, R., Schmieder, B., Mandrini, C. H., Démoulin, P., Pariat, E., Tórók, T., & Uddin, W. 2010b, Solar Phys. (Submitted)Google Scholar
Forbes, T. G., 2000, JGR, 105, 23153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopalswamy, N., Yashiro, S., Michalek, G., Xie, H.Lepping, H., & Howard, R. A. 2005, GRL, 32, 12Google Scholar
Linton, M. G., Dahlburg, R. B., & Antiochos, S. K. 2001, Astrophys. J., 553, 905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. L., Sterling, A. C., Hudson, H. S., & Lemen, J. R. 2001, Astrophys. J., 552, 833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Móstl, C., Miklenic, C., Farrugia, C. J., Temmer, M., Veronig, A. M., Galvin, A., Vrsnak, B., & Biernat, H. K. 2008, Ann. Geophys, 26, 3139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pariat, E., Nindos, A., Démoulin, P., & Berger, M. A. 2006, Astron. Astrophys, 452, 623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, N., Mathew, S. K., Louis, R. E., & Wiegelmann, T. 2009, JGR, 114, 3107Google Scholar
Titov, V. S. & Démoulin, P. 1999, Astron. Astrophys, 351, 707Google Scholar
Tórók, T., Chandra, R., Démoulin, P., Schmieder, B., Aulanier, G., Pariat, E., & Mandrini, C. H. 2010, Astrophys. J. (Submitted)Google Scholar
Yurchyshyn, V., Hu, Q., & Abramenko, V. 2005, Space Weather, 3, 8Google Scholar