Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:26:14.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The social and ritual context of horizon astronomical observations at Chankillo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2011

Iván Ghezzi
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Department of Humanities–Archaeology, Av. Universitaria 1801, Lima 32, Peru email: [email protected]
Clive L. N. Ruggles
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology and Ancient History, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The authors have shown previously that, as viewed from an evident observing point to the west, and a plausible observing point to the east, the Thirteen Towers of Chankillo formed an artificial ‘toothed’ horizon that spanned the annual rising and setting arcs of the sun and provided a means to identify each day in the seasonal year by observing the position of sunrise or sunset against them. The Thirteen Towers thus constitute a unique solar observation device that is still functioning, and a remarkable example of a native form of landscape timekeeping that preceded similar facilities in imperial Cusco by almost two millennia. Yet the social, political, and ritual contexts in which Chankillo's astronomical alignments operated deserve further exploration. In this paper, we present new archaeoastronomical evidence that not only clarifies some aspects of the solar observation device but suggests a wider range of alignments visible from more publicly accessible parts of the ceremonial complex, and also suggests a possible interest in marking lunar alignments as well as solar ones. We also bring together archaeological evidence to suggest that the society that built Chankillo was differentiated. The Thirteen Towers may have served to regulate the calendar, solar and ritual, while the solar cult centred on them may have lent legitimacy and authority to a rising warrior elite through ceremony in an impressive sacred setting that brought society together while reproducing its growing inequality.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Aveni, A. F. (ed.) 1992, The Sky in Mayan Literature, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. S. & Dearborn, D. S. P. 1995, Astronomy and Empire in the Ancient Andes: the Cultural Origins of Inca Sky Watching, University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Bray, T. L. (ed.) 2003, The Archaeology and Politics of Food and Feasting in Early States and Empires, Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, R. L. 2008, Chavín de Huántar and its sphere of influence. In Silverman, H. & Isbell, W. H. (eds), The Handbook of South American Archaeology, Springer, New York, pp. 681703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, I. 2004, Proyecto Arqueologico Chankillo: Informe de la Temporada 2003, Instituto Nacional de Cultura, Lima.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, I. 2006, Religious warfare at Chankillo. In Isbell, W. H. & Silverman, H. (eds), Andean Archaeology III, Springer, New York, pp. 6784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, I. 2007, La naturaleza de la guerra prehispánica temprana: la perspectiva desde Chankillo. Revista Andina 44, 199225.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, I. 2008, Los primeros tambores de la guerra: combate y ritual en la costa norte después del ocaso de Chavín. In Makowski, K. (ed.), Los Señorios del Reino de la Luna, Banco de Crédito del Perú, Lima, pp. 3953.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, I. & Ruggles, C. L. N. 2007, Chankillo: a 2300-year-old solar observatory in coastal Peru. Science 315, 12391243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghezzi, I. & Ruggles, C. L. N. 2008, Las trece torres de Chankillo: arqueoastronomía y organización social en el primer observatorio solar de América. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP 10, 215236.Google Scholar
Hayden, B. D. 2001, Richman, poorman, beggarman, chief: the dynamics of social inequality. In Feinman, G. M. & Price, T. D. (eds), Archaeology at the Millennium: a Sourcebook, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp. 231272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millones, L. & Onuki, Y. 1993, El Mundo Ceremonial Andino, Senri Ethnological Studies no. 37, Museo Nacional de Etnología, Osaka.Google Scholar
Ruggles, C. L. N. 1997, Whose equinox? Archaeoastronomy no. 22 (suppl. to Journal for the History of Astronomy 28), S45S50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggles, C. L. N. 2005, Ancient Astronomy: an Encyclopedia of Cosmologies and Myth, ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Topic, J. R. & Topic, T. L. 1997, Hacia una comprensión conceptual de la guerra andina. In Varon Gabai, R. & Flores Espinoza, J. (eds), Arqueología, Antropología e Historia en los Andes: Homenaje a María Rostworowski, transl. Flores Espinoza, J., Historia Andina vol. 21, Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima, pp. 567590.Google Scholar