Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T10:08:13.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The slow-neutron capture process in low-metallicity asymptotic giant branch stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

Amanda I. Karakas ,
Maria Lugaro  and
Simon W. Campbell
Amanda I. Karakas
Affiliation:
Mount Stromlo Observatory, Australian National University, Weston Creek ACT 2611, Australia email: [email protected]
Maria Lugaro
Affiliation:
Centre for Stellar and Planetary Astrophysics, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Victoria, Australia email: [email protected]
Simon W. Campbell
Affiliation:
Astronomy and Astrophysics Group, Department Fisica i Enginyeria Nuclear, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Elements heavier than iron are produced in asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars via the slow neutron capture process (s process). Recent observations of s-process-enriched Carbon Enhanced Metal-Poor (CEMP) stars have provided an unprecedented wealth of observational constraints on the operation of the s-process in low-metallicity AGB stars. We present new preliminary full network calculations of low-metallicity AGB stars, including a comparison to the composition of a few s-process rich CEMP stars. We also discuss the possibility of using halo planetary nebulae as further probes of low-metallicity AGB nucleosynthesis.

Keywords

stars: abundances – stars: AGB and post-AGB
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S265: Chemical Abundances in the Universe: Connecting First Stars to Planets , August 2009 , pp. 57 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Aoki, W., et al. 2002, ApJ, 580, p. 1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beers, T. C. & Christlieb, N. 2005, ARA&A, 43, p. 531Google Scholar
Heil, M. et al. 2008, Physical Review C, 78, 025803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivans, I. I., Sneden, C., Gallino, R., Cowan, J. J., & Preston, G. W. 2005, ApJ, 627, L145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakas, A. I. & Lattanzio, J. C. 2007, PASA, 24, p. 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakas, A. I. & Lugaro, M. 2009, PASA, accepted.Google Scholar
Karakas, A. I., et al. 2009, ApJ, 690, p. 1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucatello, S. et al. 2005, ApJ, 625, p. 824Google Scholar
Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J., & Gallino, R. 2008, ARA&A, 46, p. 241Google Scholar
Sterling, N. C. & Dinerstein, H. L. 2008, ApJS, 174, 158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Eck, S., Goriely, S., Jorissen, A., & Plez, B. 2001, Nature, 412, p. 793CrossRefGoogle Scholar