Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:29:56.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The sky as a social field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2011

Stanisław Iwaniszewski
Stanisław Iwaniszewski*
Affiliation:
Department of Postgraduate Studies in Archaeology, National School of Anthropology and History - National Institute of Anthropology and History, Mexico City, Mexico email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Like other features of the surrounding world, objects and events perceived in the sky were used to mediate between humans and specific meanings acquired in relation to them. Celestial bodies were often believed to act like human agents. In this way the skies became part of the social field of human beings—a heterogeneous space in which all important types of relationships could happen. For this reason, the study of the role celestial lore and skywatching played in human populations is a task appropriate to cultural astronomers rather than to astrophysicists or historians of science.

Keywords

cultural astronomysocial fieldtheory of practiceBourdieu
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 7 , Symposium S278: “Oxford IX” International Symposium on Archaeoastronomy , January 2011 , pp. 30 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Bird-David, N. 1999, Animism revisited: personhood, environment, and relational epistemology. Current Anthropology 40, Suppl. 167–191.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977, Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1991, El Sentido Práctico, Taurus, Madrid.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1998a, La Distinción. Criterio y Bases Sociales del Gusto, Taurus, Madrid.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1998b, Espacio social y espacio simbólico. Introducción a una lectura japonesa de La Distinción. In Capital Cultural, Escuela y Espacio Social, Siglo XXI Editores, México, D.F., pp. 23–40.Google Scholar
Brague, R. 2003, The Wisdom of the World. The Human Experience of the Universe in the Western Thought, University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London.Google Scholar
Buck, C. D. 1971, A Dictionary of Selected Synonims in the Principal Indo-European Languages. A Contribution to the History of Ideas, University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London.Google Scholar
Descola, P. 1996, Constructing natures. Symbolic ecology and social practice. In Descola, P. & Pálsson, G. (eds), Nature and Society. Anthropological Perspectives, Routledge, London & New York, pp. 82–102.Google Scholar
Henare, A., Holbraad, M., & Wastell, S. (eds) 2007, Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically, Routledge, London & New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornborg, A. 2001, Vital signs: An ecosemiotic perspective on the human ecology of Amazonia. Sign Systems Studies 29 (1), 121–151.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2000, The Perception of the Environment. Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, Routledge, London & New York.Google Scholar
Iwaniszewski, S. 2005, Venus in the East and West. Archaeoastronomy: The Journal of the Center for Archaeoastronomy 12–13, 151–162.Google Scholar
Iwaniszewski, S. 2007, El sistema social simbólico: una propuesta para la investigación arqueológica. In Fournier, P., Millán, S. & Olavarria, M. E. (eds), Antropología y Simbolismo, CONACULTA-INAH-ENAH-PROMEP, México, D.F., pp. 185–198.Google Scholar
Iwaniszewski, S. 2009, Lunar Cycles among the Classic Maya—from lunar symbolism to the Lunar Series. In Proceedings of the 17th SEAC Annual Meeting, Alexandria, 25.10-1.11.2009 (in press).Google Scholar
Iwaniszewski, S. 2010, Cultural Impacts of Astronomy. In Tymieniecka, A.T. & Grandpierre, A. (eds), Astronomy and Civilization in the New Enlightenment. Passions of the Skies [Analecta Husserliana, 107], Springer, Dordrecht & Heidelberg, pp. 123–129.Google Scholar
Iwaniszewski, S. 2011, The social life of celestial bodies: The sky in cultural perspective. In Rappenglück, M.A., Rappenglück, B. & Campion, N. (eds), Astronomy and Power: How Worlds are Structured. Proceedings of the SEAC 2010 Meeting, Gilching, Germany, BAR International Series, Oxford (in press).Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2008, Reensamblar lo Social: Una Introducción a la Teoría del Actor-Red, Ediciones Manantial, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1979, Antropología Estructural, Siglo XXI Editores, México D.F.Google Scholar
LópezAustin, A. Austin, A. 2005, Modelos a distancia: antiguas concepciones nahuas. In López Austin, A. (ed.), El Modelo de la Ciencia y la Cultura, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México/Siglo XXI Editores, México, D.F., pp. 68–93.Google Scholar
Popper, K. A. 2010, Conocimiento Objetivo, Tecnos, Madrid.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 2003, Teoría de la interpretación. Discurso y excedente de sentido, Siglo XXI Editores & Universidad Iberoamericana, México D.F.Google Scholar
Rochberg, F. 2004, The Heavenly Writing. Divination, Horoscopy, and Astronomy in Mesopotamian Culture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rochberg-Halton, F. 1984, New evidence for the history of astrology. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 43 (2), 115–140.Google Scholar
Tuan, Y. F. 1978, Space, time, place: a humanistic frame. In: Carlstein, T., Parkes, D. & Thrift, N. (eds), Making Sense of Time, Wiley, New York, pp. 7–16.Google Scholar
van Binsbergen, W. M. J. & Geschiere, P. L. (eds) 2005, Commodification: Things, Agency, and Identities (The Social Life of Things Revisited), Lit Verlag, Münster.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. 1998, Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4 (3), 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar