Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:24:44.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-cancellation of solar ephemeral regions observed by SDO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2013

Shuhong Yang ,
Jun Zhang ,
Ting Li  and
Yang Liu
Shuhong Yang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Solar Activity, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China email: [email protected]
Jun Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Solar Activity, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China email: [email protected]
Ting Li
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Solar Activity, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China email: [email protected]
Yang Liu
Affiliation:
W.W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4085, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We study the ephemeral regions (ERs) in the quiet Sun observed by the Solar Dynamics Observatory, and find that they can be classified into two types: normal ERs (NERs) and self-cancelled ERs (SERs). We identify 2988 ERs among which there are 190 SERs, about 6.4% of the ERs. The total self-cancelled flux is 9.8% of the total ER flux. We suggest that the self-cancellation of SERs is caused by the submergence of magnetic loops connecting the dipolar patches, without magnetic energy release.

Keywords

Sun: activitySun: photosphereSun: surface magnetism
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S294: Solar and Astrophysical Dynamos and Magnetic Activity , August 2012 , pp. 159 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013 

References

Hagenaar, H. J., Schrijver, C. J., & Title, A. M. 2003, ApJ, 584, 1107 Google Scholar
Harvey, K. L. & Martin, S. F. 1973, Solar Phys., 32, 389 Google Scholar
Pesnell, W. D., Thompson, B. J., & Chamberlin, P. C. 2012, Solar Phys., 275, 3 Google Scholar
Scherrer, P. H., Schou, J., Bush, R. I., et al. 2012, Solar Phys., 275, 207 Google Scholar
Schrijver, C. J., Title, A. M., Harvey, K. L., et al. 1998, Nature, 394, 152 Google Scholar
Wang, J. X., Zhou, G. P., Jin, C. L., & Li, H. 2012, Solar Phys., 278, 299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S. H., Zhang, J., & Borrero, J. M. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1012 Google Scholar
Zwaan, C. 1987, ARAA, 25, 83 Google Scholar