Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:15:04.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seismic studies of planet-harbouring stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Sylvie Vauclair
Sylvie Vauclair*
Affiliation:
Université de Toulouse, UPS-OMP, IRAP, France, and CNRS, IRAP, 14 avenue Edouard Belin, F-31400 Toulouse, France, email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the past decades, stellar oscillations and exoplanet searches were developed in parallel, and the observations were done with the same instruments: radial velocity method, essentially with ground-based instruments, and photometric methods (light curves) from space. The same observational data on one star could lead to planet discoveries at large time scales (days to years) and to the detection of stellar oscillations at small time scales (minutes), such as for the star μ Arae. Since the beginning, it seemed interesting to investigate the differences between stars with and without observed planets. Also, a precise determination of the stellar parameters is important to characterize the detected exoplanets. With the thousands of exoplanet candidates discovered by Kepler, automatic procedures and pipelines are needed with large data bases to characterize the central stars. However, precise asteroseismic studies of well-chosen stars are still important for a deeper insight.

Keywords

asteroseismologyexoplanets
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Symposium S301: Precision Asteroseismology , August 2013 , pp. 353 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Alecian, G. & LeBlanc, F. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballot, J., Gizon, L., Samadi, R., et al. 2011, ApJS, 204, 24Google Scholar
Batalha, N. M.; Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2013, A&A, 530, A97Google Scholar
Bazot, M., Vauclair, S., Bouchy, F., & Santos, N. 2005, A&A, 440, 615Google Scholar
Benomar, O., Baudin, F., Chaplin, W. J., Elsworth, Y., & Appourchaux, T. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 2178Google Scholar
Bouchy, F., Bazot, M., Santos, N., Vauclair, S., & Sosnowska, D. 2005, A&A, 440, 609Google Scholar
Brassard, P. 1992, ApJS, 81, 747Google Scholar
Chaplin, W. J., Appourchaux, T., Arentoft, T., et al. 2008, AN, 329, 549Google Scholar
Charpinet, S., Fontaine, G., Brassard, P., et al. 2011, Nature, 480, 496Google Scholar
Chereul, E., Crézé, M., & Bienaymé, O. 1999, A&AS, 135, 5Google Scholar
Escobar, M. E., 2013, Ph.D. thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, ToulouseGoogle Scholar
Escobar, M. E., Théado, S., Vauclair, S., et al., 2012, A&A, 543, A96Google Scholar
Famaey, B., Pont, F., Luri, X., et al. 2007, A&A, 461, 957Google Scholar
Fischer, D. A. & Valenti, J. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1102Google Scholar
Gizon, L., Ballot, J., Michel, E., et al. 2012, PNAS, 110, 13267Google Scholar
Gonzalez, G., Laws, C., Tyagi, S., & Reddy, B. E. 2001, AJ, 121, 432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenon, M. 2000, in: Matteucci, & Giovanelli, (eds.) The evolution of the Milky Way, p. 47Google Scholar
Huber, D., Chaplin, W. J., & Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. 2013, ApJ, 767, 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui-Bon-Hoa, A. 2008, Ap&SS, 316, 55Google Scholar
Kjeldsen, H. & Bedding, T. R., 1995, A&A, 293, 87Google Scholar
Kjeldsen, H., Bedding, T. R., & Christensen-Dalsgaard, J. 2008, ApJ, 683, L175Google Scholar
Laymand, M. & Vauclair, S. 2007, A&A, 463, 657Google Scholar
LeBlanc, F. & Alecian, G. 2004, MNRAS, 352, 1329Google Scholar
Lebreton, Y., Fernandes, J., & Lejeune, T. 2001, A&A, 374, 540Google Scholar
Mathur, S., García, R. A., Régulo, C., et al. 2010, A&A, 511, 46Google Scholar
Montez, D., Lopez-Santiago, J., Galvez, M. C., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 45Google Scholar
Paquette, C., Pelletier, C., Fontaine, G., & Michaud, G. 1986, ApJS, 61, 177Google Scholar
Pepe, F., Correia, A. C. M., Mayor, M., et al. 2007, A&A, 462, 769Google Scholar
Richard, O., Vauclair, S., Charbonnel, C., & Dziembowski, W. A. 1996, A&A, 312, 1000Google Scholar
Richard, O., Théado, S., & Vauclair, S. 2004, Solar Phys., 220, 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., & Mayor, M. 2004a, A&A, 415, 1153Google Scholar
Santos, N. C., Bouchy, F., Mayor, M., et al. 2004b, A&A, 426, L19Google Scholar
Silvotti, R., Schuh, S., Janulis, R., et al. 2007, Nature, 449, 189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stello, D., Chaplin, W. J., Bruntt, H., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Théado, S., Vauclair, S., Alecian, G., LeBlanc, F., & Vauclair, S. 2009, ApJ, 704, 1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Théado, S., Alecian, G., LeBlanc, F., & Vauclair, S. 2012, A&A, 546, A100Google Scholar
Vauclair, S., Laymand, M., Bouchy, F., Vauclair, G., Hui Bon Hoa, A., Charpinet, S., & Bazot, M. 2008, A&A, 482, L5Google Scholar