Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:24:02.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Science of Galaxy Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

Gerard Gilmore*
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Our knowledge of the Universe remains discovery-led: in the absence of adequate physics-based theory, interpretation of new results requires a scientific methodology. Commonly, scientific progress in astrophysics is motivated by the empirical success of the “Copernican Principle”, that the simplest and most objective analysis of observation leads to progress. A complementary approach tests the prediction of models against observation. In practise, astrophysics has few real theories, and has little control over what we can observe. Compromise is unavoidable. Advances in understanding complex non-linear situations, such as galaxy formation, require that models attempt to isolate key physical properties, rather than trying to reproduce complexity. A specific example is discussed, where substantial progress in fundamental physics could be made with an ambitious approach to modelling: simulating the spectrum of perturbations on small scales.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2009

References

Binney, J. 2002, EAS Publications Series, Volume 2, Proceedings of “GAIA: A European Space Project”, held 14-18 May, 2001 Les Houches, France. Edited by Bienaymé, O. and Turon, C.. EDP Sciences pp. 245-256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N. & Frigg, R. 2007, Physics World, 20, 14 (September)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerda-Olmedo, E. 2008, European Review, 16, 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, G., Gustafsson, B., Edvardsson, B., & Nissen, P. E. 1992, Nature, 357, 379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, G. & Reid, I. N. 1983, MNRAS, 202, 1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, G. & Wyse, R. F. G. 1985, AJ, 90, 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, G., Wilkinson, M. I., Wyse, R. F. G., Kleyna, J. T., Koch, A., Evans, N. W., & Grebel, E. K. 2007, ApJ, 663, 948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leggatt, A. J. 2008, RPP, 71, 1Google Scholar
Ostriker, J. P. & Steinhardt, P. 2003 Science, 300, 1909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharina, M. E., Karachentsev, I. D., & Dolphin, A. E., et al. 2008 MNRAS, 384, 1544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strömgren, B. 1987 in ‘The Galaxy’, eds Gilmore, G and Carswell, R, CUP, p. 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar