Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:47:24.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rogue Active Regions and the Inherent Unpredictability of the Solar Dynamo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2018

Kristóf Petrovay Open the ORCID record for Kristóf Petrovay [Opens in a new window]  and
Melinda Nagy
Kristóf Petrovay
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary email: [email protected], [email protected]
Melinda Nagy
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary email: [email protected], [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

New developments in surface flux transport modeling and theory of flux transport dynamos have given rise to the notion that certain large active regions with anomalous properties (location, tilt angle and/or Hale/non-Hale character) may have a major impact on the course of solar activity in subsequent years, impacting also on the amplitude of the following solar cycles. Here we discuss our current understanding of the role of such “rogue” active regions in cycle-to-cycle variations of solar activity.

Keywords

Sun: activitySun: magnetic fieldsSun: sunspots
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 13 , Symposium S340: Long-term Datasets for the Understanding of Solar and Stellar Magnetic Cycles , February 2018 , pp. 307 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Cameron, R. H., Dasi-Espuig, M., Jiang, J., Işık, E., Schmitt, D., & Schüssler, M. 2013, Astron. Astrophys. 557, A141Google Scholar
Cameron, R. H., Jiang, J., Schmitt, D., & Schüssler, M. 2010, Astrophys. J. 719, 264Google Scholar
Dasi-Espuig, M., Solanki, S. K., Krivova, N. A., Cameron, R., & Peñuela, T. 2010, Astron. Astrophys. 518Google Scholar
Hazra, G., Choudhuri, A. R., & Miesch, M. S. 2017, Astrophys. J. 835, 39Google Scholar
Jiang, J., Cameron, R. H., & Schüssler, M. 2014, Astrophys. J. 791, 5Google Scholar
Jiang, J., Cameron, R. H., & Schüssler, M. 2015, Astrophys. J. Lett. 808, L28Google Scholar
Lemerle, A. & Charbonneau, P. 2017, Astrophys. J. 834, 133Google Scholar
Lemerle, A., Charbonneau, P., & Carignan-Dugas, A. 2015, Astrophys. J. 810, 78Google Scholar
Maehara, H., Notsu, Y., Notsu, S., Namekata, K., Honda, S., Ishii, T. T., Nogami, D., & Shibata, K. 2017, Publ. Astr. Soc. Japan 69, 41Google Scholar
Miesch, M. S. & Teweldebirhan, K. 2016, Advances in Space Research 58, 1571Google Scholar
Muñoz-Jaramillo, A., Balmaceda, L. A., & DeLuca, E. E. 2013, Physical Review Letters 111, 041106Google Scholar
Nagy, M., Lemerle, A., Labonville, F., Petrovay, K., & Charbonneau, P. 2017, Solar Phys. 292, 167Google Scholar
Namekata, K., Sakaue, T., Watanabe, K., Asai, A., Maehara, H., Notsu, Y., Notsu, S., Honda, S., Ishii, T. T., Ikuta, K., Nogami, D., & Shibata, K. 2017, Astrophys. J. 851, 91Google Scholar
Shibata, K., Isobe, H., Hillier, A., Choudhuri, A. R., Maehara, H., Ishii, T. T., Shibayama, T., Notsu, S., Notsu, Y., Nagao, T., Honda, S., & Nogami, D. 2013, Publ. Astr. Soc. Japan 65, 49Google Scholar
Yeates, A. R., Baker, D., & van Driel-Gesztelyi, L. 2015, Solar Phys. 290, 3189Google Scholar
Yeates, A. R. & Muñoz-Jaramillo, A. 2013, Mon. Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. 436, 3366Google Scholar