Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:06:49.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revealing the Relation between Star Formation Activity of Jellyfish Galaxies and Ram Pressure Stripping

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2023

Jeong Hwan Lee Open the ORCID record for Jeong Hwan Lee [Opens in a new window] ,
Myung Gyoon Lee ,
Jae Yeon Mun ,
Brian S. Cho  and
Jisu Kang
Jeong Hwan Lee
Affiliation:
Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
Myung Gyoon Lee
Affiliation:
Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
Jae Yeon Mun
Affiliation:
Australian Nationial University, Canberra, ACT 2611, Australia
Brian S. Cho
Affiliation:
Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
Jisu Kang
Affiliation:
Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Jellyfish galaxies are starburst galaxies with ram-pressure-stripped tails and blue star-forming knots. These galaxies show a snapshot of star formation enhancement triggered by ram pressure stripping (RPS), being important targets for studying the RPS-induced star formation in gas-rich galaxies. Here we investigate the star formation activity of five jellyfish galaxies in massive clusters, using Gemini GMOS/IFU observations. From the Hα-derived star formation rates (SFRs), we find that our sample shows higher SFR excess to the star formation main sequence than the jellyfish galaxies in low-mass clusters. From the compiled sample of jellyfish galaxies in low-mass to high-mass host clusters, we suggest that the star formation activity of jellyfish galaxies has positive correlations with host cluster mass and degree of RPS. These relationships imply that higher ram pressure environments tend to trigger stronger starbursts in jellyfish galaxies in the early stage of RPS.

Keywords

Galaxy evolutionGalaxy environmentsRam pressure strippingStarburst galaxyJellyfish galaxyIntegral Field Spectroscopy
Type
Poster Paper
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 17 , Symposium S373: Resolving the Rise and Fall of Star Formation in Galaxies , August 2021 , pp. 132 - 135
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Bekki, K. & Couch, W. J. 2003, ApJL, 596, L13 10.1086/379054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245 10.1086/167900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763 10.1086/376392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebeling, H., Edge, A. C., & Henry, J. P. 2001, ApJ, 553, 668 10.1086/320958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebeling, H., Stephenson, L. N., & Edge, A. C. 2014, ApJL, 781, L40 10.1088/2041-8205/781/2/L40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebeling, H. & Kalita, B. S. 2019, ApJ, 882, 127 10.3847/1538-4357/ab35d6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullieuszik, M., Poggianti, B. M., McGee, S. L., et al. 2020, ApJ, 899, 13 10.3847/1538-4357/aba3cbCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, J. E. & Gott, J. R. 1972, ApJ, 176, 1 10.1086/151605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. H., Lee, M. G., Mun, J. Y., et al. 2022a, ApJ accepted, arXiv:2209.07189Google Scholar
Lee, J. H., Lee, M. G., Mun, J. Y., et al. 2022b, ApJL, 931, L22 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6e39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotz, J. M., Koekemoer, A., Coe, D., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 97 10.3847/1538-4357/837/1/97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPartland, C., Ebeling, H., Roediger, E., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 2994 10.1093/mnras/stv2508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owers, M. S., Couch, W. J., Nulsen, P. E. J., et al. 2012, ApJL, 750, L23 10.1088/2041-8205/750/1/L23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poggianti, B. M., Moretti, A., Gullieuszik, M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 844, 48 10.3847/1538-4357/aa78edCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, I. D., Parker, L. C., Gwyn, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 1342 10.1093/mnras/stab3101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, E., Bruggen, M., Owers, M. S., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, L114 10.1093/mnrasl/slu087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roman-Oliveira, F. V., Chies-Santos, A. L., Rodrguez del Pino, B., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 892 10.1093/mnras/stz007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speagle, J. S., Steinhardt, C. L., Capak, P. L., et al. 2014, ApJS, 214, 15 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vulcani, B., Poggianti, B. M., Gullieuszik, M., et al. 2018, ApJL, 866, L25 10.3847/2041-8213/aae68bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Lee et al. supplementary material

Lee et al. supplementary material

Download Lee et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 613.6 KB