Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:07:59.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Red-giant branch morphology of metal-poor globular clusters in the Galactic bulge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2007

J. W. Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, IEAA, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea email: [email protected]
H. I. Kim
Affiliation:
Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Daejeon 305-348, Korea
Y. J. Sohn
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, IEAA, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Using the (JK, K) color-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) of 16 metal-poor globular clusters in the Galactic bulge, we investigate the morphological properties of their red-giant branch (RGB), comparing with those of metal-rich clusters in the Galactic bulge and metal-poor clusters in the Galactic halo. The RGB morphological parameters, such as colors at fixed magnitudes, magnitudes at a fixed color, the RGB slope, and a difference of color indices at two fixed magnitudes have been derived from the near-IR CMDs for each cluster. Metal-poor Galactic bulge clusters follow the previous empirical relations between colors at fixed magnitudes and magnitudes at a fixed color of the RGB and the cluster's metallicity. However, the RGB slope and the color difference parameters of some bulge clusters deviate slightly from the previous empirical linear relations for the other globular clusters, implying that the metal-poor bulge clusters may have different formation origin from the other globular clusters in the Galaxy.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Harris, W. E. 1996, AJ 112, 1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, V. D. & Borissova, J. 2002, A&A 390, 937Google Scholar
Kim, J.-W. et al. 2006, A&A 459, 499Google Scholar
Valenti, E., Ferraro, F. R., & Origlia, L. 2004, MNRAS 351, 1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenti, E., Origlia, L. & Ferraro, F. R. 2005, MNRAS 361, 272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, S. K., Kim, Y.-C., & Demarque, P. 2003, ApJS 144, 259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoccali, M. et al. 2003, A&A 399, 931Google Scholar