Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:43:02.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re-assessment of the Accretion Disc Clock in Hercules X-1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

E. Jurua
Affiliation:
University of the Free State, P.O.Box 334, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O.Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda
M. Still
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center M/S 244-30, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
P. J. Meintjes
Affiliation:
University of the Free State, P.O.Box 334, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
P. A. Charles
Affiliation:
South African Astronomical Observatory, P.O. Box 9, Observatory 7935, South Africa, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa, and School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, JK
S. K Anguma
Affiliation:
University of the Free State, P.O.Box 334, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Galactic neutron star X-ray binary Her X-1 shows a 35-day photometric modulation. Detected across a broad energy range, the modulation is prevalent in X-rays, cycling between low and high states. Since the discovery of the 35-day cycle of Her X-1, the X-ray source has entered and returned from an extended anomalous low state on at least seven occasions. Employing Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer All-Sky Monitor observations, prior predictions that Her X-1 would return from the 2003 - 2004 anomalous low state with a new precession period and accretion luminosity are verified. However, the precession has not been as coherent over recent years as predicted. Potentially there have been more minor anomalous low states between 2004 and the present day.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Giacconi, R., Gursky, H., Kellogg, E., et al. 1973 ApJ, 184, 227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leahy, D. A. & Igna, , 2010 ApJ 10, 10Google Scholar
Leahy, D. A. & Marshall, H., 1999 ApJ, 521, 328Google Scholar
Leahy, D. A. & Scott, D. M., 1998, ApJ 503, L63Google Scholar
Middleditch, J. & Nelson, J., 1976 ApJ, 208, 567Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. P., Quaintrell, H., Still, M. D., et al. 1997 MNRAS, 288, 43Google Scholar
Scott, D. M., Leahy, D.A.,& Wilson, R. B., 2000 ApJ, 539, 392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Still, M. & Boyd, P., 2004 ApJ, 606, L135Google Scholar
Tananbaum, H., Gursky, H., Kellogg, E. M., et al. 1972 ApJ, 174, L145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wijers, R. A. M. & Pringle, J. E., 1999 MNRAS, 308, 207Google Scholar