Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:01:45.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radio Transients in the Era of Multi-Messenger Astrophysics

Workshop 1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2019

G. E. Anderson
Affiliation:
Curtin University, Perth, Australia email: [email protected]
B. W. Stappers
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, UK
I. Andreoni
Affiliation:
Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
M. Caleb
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, UK
D. Coppejans
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Evanston, USA
S. Corbel
Affiliation:
Laboratoire AIM, CEA Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
R. P. Fender
Affiliation:
Astrophysics, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, UK
M. Giroletti
Affiliation:
INAF, Istituto di Radio Astronomia di Bologna, Italy
M. L. Graham
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Seattle, USA
K. V. Sokolovsky
Affiliation:
IAASARS, National Observatory of Athens, Greece
P. A. Woudt
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radio emission from astrophysical transients allows us to derive calorimetry of kinetic feedback and detailed imaging in ways that are not possible at other wavelengths, and as such it forms an important part of the multi-messenger follow-ups of these events. The field is burgeoning, with a renaissance of interest in accretion, stellar explosions and jetted supernovæ, alongside newer classes of phenomena such as fast radio bursts and tidal disruption events. The purpose of this workshop was to discuss the infrastructure and techniques for detecting, identifying and probing radio transients, with a particular focus on how best to exploit transient alerts from multi-messenger facilities. We examined the type of transient alerts those facilities will broadcast, and methods for following them up, such as rapid-response triggering and shadowing. In break-out groups, participants chose a science question related to a particular radio transient type or class and discussed whether the planned transient strategies and observing techniques on the Square Kilometre Array will be adequate to address the particular question. The classes they chose included fast radio bursts, supernovæ, cataclysmic variable and unknown transients. Any proposed adaptation or suggestion was relayed to a panel of experts for further discussion. The second part of the workshop concentrated on the application of long baseline interferometry for detecting and measuring radio transients.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2019 

References

Abbott, B. P., et al. 2017, ApJ, 848, L12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G. E., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 1512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G. E., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, I., et al. 2017, PASA, 34, e037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhandari, S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloemen, S., et al. 2016, in: Proc. SPIE, 9906, 990664Google Scholar
Caleb, M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 3746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champion, D. J., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, L30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomiuk, L., et al. 2016, ApJ, 821, 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Q., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppejans, D. L., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 3801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppehans, D. L., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 2229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbel, S., et al. 2015, AASKA14, p. 53Google Scholar
Fender, R. P., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, L66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, P. J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, L35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, D. L., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, L25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körding, E., et al. 2008, Science, 320, 1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L., Tong, F., Zheng, W., Zhang, J., & Tong, L. 2018, AJ, 155, 98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macquart, J.-P., & Ekers, R. D. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcote, B., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, L8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooley, K. P., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, L31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J. S., et al. 2013, ApJ, 768, 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palaniswamy, D., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, L12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paragi, Z., et al. 2015, AASKA14, p. 143Google Scholar
Petroff, E., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petroff, E., et al. 2016, PASA, 33, e045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petroff, E., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 4465Google Scholar
Petroff, E., et al. 2017b, arXiv:1710.08155Google Scholar
Petroff, E., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, P., et al. 2016, J. Astron, Instrument., 5, 1641008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, T. D., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 3720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, H., & Behrend, D. 2012, J. Geodynamics, 61, 68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitler, L. G. et al. 2016, Nature, 531, 202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staley, T. D., & Fender, R. 2016, arXiv:1606.03735Google Scholar
Wagstaff, K. L., et al. 2016, PASP, 128, 084503)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. C. 1999, ASPC, 180, p. 433Google Scholar
Wayth, R. B., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Anderson et al. supplementary material

Anderson et al. supplementary material

Download Anderson et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 97.8 KB