Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:55:40.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiative hydrodynamics models of stellar convection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Matthias Steffen
Matthias Steffen*
Affiliation:
Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam, 14482 Potsdam, Germany email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the quest for a better theoretical understanding of the dynamical processes operating in stellar envelopes, increasingly more realistic hydrodynamical models of stellar convection have been developed over the last 25 years. Based on 3D state-of-the-art simulations performed recently with the radiation hydrodynamics code CO5BOLD, we review the present status of hydrodynamical modeling of stellar surface convection and demonstrate the basic differences between 3D hydrodynamical models and 1D ‘classical’ hydrostatic atmospheres where convection is treated by the mixing-length theory. We briefly discuss some of the many possible applications across the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, including spectroscopic abundance determinations using 3D stellar atmospheres, particularly with regard to the much debated question of the solar oxygen abundance.

Keywords

Convectionhydrodynamicsradiative transferSun: granulationSun: abundancesstars: atmospheres
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 2 , Symposium S239: Convection in Astrophysics , August 2006 , pp. 36 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A.J., Allende Prieto, C., & Kiselman, D. 2004, A&A 417, 751Google Scholar
Asplund, M., Nordlund, Å., Trampedach, R., & Stein, R.F. 1999, A&A 346, L17Google Scholar
Aufdenberg, J.P., Ludwig, H.-G., & Kervella, P. 2005, ApJ 633, 424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, K., & Sofia, S. 1987, Science 235, 465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, K., & Sofia, S. 1989, ApJ 336, 1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freytag, B., Ludwig, H.-G., & Steffen, M. 1996, A&A 313, 497Google Scholar
Freytag, B., Steffen, M. & Dorch, B. 2002, Astron. Nachr. 323, 2133.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freytag, B., & Steffen, M. 2005, in: Zverko, J., Ziznovsky, J., Adelman, S.J. & Weiss, W.W. (eds.), The A-star puzzle, Proc. IAU Symposium No. 224 (Cambridge University Press), p. 139Google Scholar
Freytag, B. 2006, A&A (in press)Google Scholar
Holweger, H., & Müller, E. 1974, Solar Phys. 39, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holweger, H. 2001 in: Wimmer-Schweingruber, R.F. (ed.), Solar and galactic composition, AIP Conf. Proc. 598, p. 23Google Scholar
Kupka, F., & Montgomery, M.H. 2002, MNRAS 330, L6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mihalas, D. 1978, Stellar Atmospheres, 2nd edition (Freeman and Company)Google Scholar
Ludwig, H.-G. 2006, A&A 445, 661Google Scholar
Ludwig, H.-G., Freytag, B., & Steffen, M. 1999, A&A 346, 111Google Scholar
Steffen, M., Freytag, B., & Ludwig, H.-G. 2005, in: Favata, F., Hussain, G.A.J., & Battrick, B. (eds.), Proc. 13th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems and the Sun, (ESA Publications), p. 985Google Scholar
Wedemeyer, S., Freytag, B., Steffen, M., Ludwig, H.-G., & Holweger, H. 2002, A&A 414, 1121Google Scholar