Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:43:22.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radial abundance gradients from planetary nebulae and young objects: Age effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2012

Walter J. Maciel ,
Thaise Rodrigues  and
Roberto Costa
Walter J. Maciel
Affiliation:
Astronomy Department, University of São PauloRua do Matão 1226, 05508-090 São Paulo SP, Brazil email: [email protected] - [email protected] - [email protected]
Thaise Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Astronomy Department, University of São PauloRua do Matão 1226, 05508-090 São Paulo SP, Brazil email: [email protected] - [email protected] - [email protected]
Roberto Costa
Affiliation:
Astronomy Department, University of São PauloRua do Matão 1226, 05508-090 São Paulo SP, Brazil email: [email protected] - [email protected] - [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We discuss the effects on the time variation of the gradients resulting from our determinations of the age distributions of CSPN. The main conclusions are: (i) for most CSPN with accurate radial velocities the kinematic ages are usually under 3 Gyr, so that the differences between the gradients of these objects and of younger objects are expected to be small; (ii) results based on age-metallicity relations suggest that there is an older PN population for which the gradients are steeper, in agreement with open cluster data.

Keywords

planetary nebulae: generalGalaxy: abundancesGalaxy: evolution
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 7 , Symposium S283: Planetary Nebulae: An Eye to the Future , July 2011 , pp. 424 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Andreuzzi, G., Bragaglia, A., Tosi, M., & Marconi, G., 2011, MNRAS, 412, 1265 Google Scholar
Daflon, S. & Cunha, K., 2004, ApJ, 617, 1115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durand, S., Acker, A., & Zijlstra, A., 1998, A&AS, 132, 13 Google Scholar
Holmberg, J., Nordström, B., & Andersen, J., 2007, A&A, 475, 519 Google Scholar
Holmberg, J., Nordström, B., & Andersen, J., 2009, A&A, 501, 941 Google Scholar
Luck, R. E., Andrievsky, S. M., Kovtyukh, V. V., et al. , 2011, AJ, 142, 51 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maciel, W. J. & Costa, R. D. D., 2009, IAU Symp. 254, Electronic publication, CUP Google Scholar
Maciel, W. J., Costa, R. D. D., & Idiart, T. E. P., 2010, A&A, 512, A19 Google Scholar
Maciel, W. J., Rodrigues, T. S., & Costa, R. D. D., 2011, Rev. Mexicana A&A, 47, 401 Google Scholar
Magrini, L., Stanghellini, L., & Villaver, E., 2009, ApJ, 696, 729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordström, B., Mayor, M., Andersen, J. et al. , 2004, A&A, 418, 989 Google Scholar
Stanghellini, L., Magrini, L., Villaver, E., & Galli, D., 2010, A&A, 521, A3 Google Scholar