Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T09:21:11.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Probing the Local Bubble with Diffuse Interstellar Bands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2014

A. Farhang
Affiliation:
School of Astronomy, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), P.O. Box 19395-5746, Tehran, Iran email: [email protected]
H. G. Khosroshahi
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Sharif University of Technology, P. O. Box 11365-9161, Tehran, Iran
A. Javadi
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Sharif University of Technology, P. O. Box 11365-9161, Tehran, Iran
J. van Loon
Affiliation:
Astrophysics Group, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Sun is located inside an enormous local cavity filled with a million degree, ionized hydrogen gas and surrounded by a wall of dense and cold gas, this cavity is known as the Local Bubble (LB). Since the tempreture of Local Bubble is high, the typical singly-ionized atoms or molecules can not survive at this high tempreture. To overcome this problem we should probe the Local Bubble using species which survive under this condition so we have done a whole sky survey in north hemisphere by observing absorptions in the Diffuse Interstellar Bands (DIBs) for sight-lines with distance >300 pc. We have done 30 nights observation and have observed 473 bright stars. We found that the correlations between 5780 Å DIBs and Na I D doublets inside of the LB is much more than carriers outside of the LB.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Bohlin, R. C. 1975, ApJ, 200, 402BGoogle Scholar
Bowyer, C. S., Field, G. B., & Mack, J. E. 1968, Nature, 217, 32BGoogle Scholar
Cordiner, M. A. 2006, Ph.D. thesis, the University of NottinghamGoogle Scholar
Crawford, I. A. 2003, ApSS, 285, 661Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, M.Pini, 1968, AJ, 73, 983FGoogle Scholar
Heiles, C. & Troland, T. H. 2005, ApJ, 624, 773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heger, M. L. 1922, Lick Obs. Bull, 10, 146Google Scholar
Hurwitz, M., Sasseen, T. P., & Sirk, M. M 2005, ApJ, 623, 911Google Scholar
Moutou, C., Krelowski, J., DHendecourt, L., & Jamroszczak, J. 1999, A&A, 351, 680Google Scholar
Stanimirovis, . & Heiles, C. 2005, ApJ, 631, 371Google Scholar
Vallerga, J. & Slavin, J. 1998, LNP, 506, 79VGoogle Scholar
van Loon, J. T. h., Smith, K. T., McDonald, I., Sarre, P. J., Fossey, S. J., & Sharp, R. G. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 195Google Scholar
van Loon, J. Th., Bailey, M., Tatton, B. L., Maíz Apellániz, J., Crowther, P. A., de Koter, A., Evans, C. J., Hénault-Brunet, V., Howarth, I. D., & Richter, P. 2013, A&A, 550A, 108VGoogle Scholar
Welsh, B. Y., Lallement, R., Vergely, J.-L., & Raimond, S. 2010, A&A, 510, A54Google Scholar
West, R. G. & Sims, M. R. 1994, Planet Space Sci, 42, 71Google Scholar