Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:56:48.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Post-Newtonian Treatment of Relativistic Compact Object Binaries in Star Clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

J. M. B. Downing  and
R. Spurzem
J. M. B. Downing
Affiliation:
Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum für Astronomie, Universität Heidelberg email: [email protected]
R. Spurzem
Affiliation:
Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum für Astronomie, Universität Heidelberg email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Stellar mass compact object binaries are promising sources of gravitational radiation for the current generation of ground-based detectors, VIRGO and LIGO. Accurate templates for gravitational waveforms are needed in order to extract an event from the VIRGO/LIGO data stream. In the case of relativistic, compact object binaries accurate orbital parameters are necessary in order to produce such templates. Binary systems are affected by their stellar environment and thus the parameters of the binary population of a dense star cluster will be different from those of the field population. We propose to investigate the parameters of relativistic binary populations in dense star clusters using direct N-body simulations with a Post-Newtonian treatment of general relativity for the close binaries.

Keywords

stellar dynamicsrelativitygravitational wavesmethods: n-body simulationsbinaries: close
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S246: Dynamical Evolution of Dense Stellar Systems , September 2007 , pp. 265 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Aarseth, S. J. 1999, PASP 111, 1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, A. & Cohen, L. 1973, J. Comput. Phys. 12, 389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchet, L. 2006, Living Rev. Relativity 9, 4,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupi, G., Amaro-Seoane, P., & Spurzem, R. 2006, MNRAS 371, L45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kustaanheimo, P. & Stiefel, E. 1965, J. Reine Angew. Math. 218, 204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, P. C. & Mathews, J. 1977, Phys. Rev. 131 no. 1, 435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurzem, F. 1999, J. Comp. Appl. Maths. 109, 407CrossRefGoogle Scholar