Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:25:30.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Populations of massive stars in galaxies, implications for the stellar evolution theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2006

Georges Meynet ,
Patrick Eggenberger  and
André Maeder
Georges Meynet
Affiliation:
Geneva Observatory, University of Geneva, CH-1290 Sauverny, Switzerland email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Patrick Eggenberger
Affiliation:
Liège University, AGO Department, B-4000 Liège 1 email: [email protected]
André Maeder
Affiliation:
Geneva Observatory, University of Geneva, CH-1290 Sauverny, Switzerland email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

After a brief review of the observational evidences indicating how the populations of Be stars, red/blue supergiants, Wolf-Rayet stars vary as a function of metallicity, we discuss the implications of these observed trend for our understanding of the massive star evolution. We show how the inclusion of the effects of rotation in stellar models improves significantly the correspondence between theory and observation.

Keywords

stars: evolutionrotationearly-typesupergiantsWolf-Rayet
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 2 , Symposium S241: Stellar Populations as Building Blocks of Galaxies , December 2006 , pp. 13 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Chiappini, C., Matteucci, F. & Ballero, S.K. 2005, A&A, 437, 429Google Scholar
Chiappini, C., Hirschi, R., Meynet, G., Ekstrm, S., Maeder, A., & Matteucci, F. 2006, A&A Letters, 449, 27Google Scholar
Decressin, T., Meynet, G., Charbonnel, C., Prantzos, N., & Ekstrm, S. 2007, A&A, in press (astro-ph/0611379)Google Scholar
Dohm-Palmer, R.C., & Skillman, E.D. 2002, AJ 123, 1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggenberger, P., Meynet, G. & Maeder, A. 2002, A&A 386, 756Google Scholar
Heger, A., & Langer, N. 2000 ApJ 544, 1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschi, R., Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 2005 A&A 443, 581Google Scholar
Langer, N., & Maeder, A. 1995, A&A, 295, 685Google Scholar
Maeder, A., & Meynet, G. 1994, A&A 287, 803Google Scholar
Maeder, A., & Meynet, G. 2001, A&A 373, 555Google Scholar
Maeder, A., & Meynet, G. 2005, A&A Letters, 448, 37Google Scholar
Maeder, A., Grebel, E.K., & Mermilliod, J.-C. 1999, A&A 346, 459Google Scholar
Martayan, C., Hubert, A.-M., Floquet, M., Fabregat, J., Fremat, Y., Neiner, C., Stee, P., & Zorec, J. 2006, A&A, 445, 931Google Scholar
Massey, P. 2003, ARAA, 41, 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meylan, G., & Maeder, A. 1982, A&A 386, 576Google Scholar
Meynet, G., & Maeder, A., 2002, A&A 390, 561Google Scholar
Meynet, G., & Maeder, A., 2005, A&A 429, 581Google Scholar
Meynet, G., & Maeder, A., 2007, A&A, in press (astro-ph/0701494)Google Scholar
Meynet, G., Ekström, S., & Maeder, A. 2006, A&A 447, 623Google Scholar
Nugis, T., & Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. 2000, A&A 360, 227Google Scholar
Pelupessy, I., Lamers, H.J.G.L.M., & Vink, J.S. 2000, ApJ, 359, 695Google Scholar
Smith, L. F., & Maeder, A. 1991 A&A 241, 77Google Scholar
Spite, M., Cayrel, R., Plez, B. et al. 2005, A&A, 430, 655Google Scholar
vander Hucht, K. der Hucht, K. 2001, New Astron. Reviews, 45, 135Google Scholar
Vink, J.S., deKoter, A. Koter, A., & Lamers, H.J.G.L.M. 2001, A&A, 369, 574Google Scholar
Wisniewski, J.P., & Bjorkman, K.S. 2006, ApJ 652, 458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahn, J.-P. 1992, A&A 265, 115Google Scholar